Abstract
This chapter’s cultural view on quality science teaching affords perspectives on school science that represent a plurality of aims, allows a reconceptualization of school science content so it can engender quality science teaching rather than inhibit it, and, through the intricate, context-laden, interplay between relevance and students’ self-identities explicitly answers the question: “Why would students want to engage with school science in the first place?” In developing these perspectives and reconceptualizations the author offers nine indicators of what quality science teaching is, and six indicators of what it is not. These indicators relate to “evidence” that could reflect the extent to which quality science teaching may be occurring in a classroom, in a school, and in a school system. “Evidence” is used here in the sense of the conventional meaning of “evidence” in qualitative or quantitative social science research: trustworthy evidence—consequently, the suggested indicators of quality science teaching relate to evidence-based practice in the social science sense of trustworthy evidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A-P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855.
Adamuti-Trache, M., & Andres, L. (2008). Embarking on and persisting in scientific fields of study: Cultural capital, gender, and curriculum along the science pipeline. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1557–1584.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1991). Logical reasoning in science & technology. Toronto: Wiley of Canada.
Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Alberts, B. (2000). Some thoughts on science as inquiry. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 3–13). Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Baram-Tsabari, A., Sethi, R. J., Bry, L., & Yarden, A. (2006). Using questions sent to an ask-a-scientist site to identity children’s interests in science. Science Education, 90, 1050–1072.
Barnes, M. B., & Barnes, L. W. (2005). Using inquiry processes to investigate knowledge, skills, and perceptions of diverse learners: An approach to working with prospective and current science teachers . In A. J. Rodrigues & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 61–86). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2006). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347–370.
Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Mulhall, P. (2007). Values associated with representing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 149–163). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bianchini, J. A., Cavazos, L. M., & Helm, J. V. (2000). From professional lives to inclusive practice: Science teachers and scientists’ views of gender and ethnicity in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 511–547.
Brandt, C. B. (2008). Scientific discourse in the academy: A case study of an American Indian undergraduate. Science Education, 92, 825–847.
Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295.
Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971–1002.
Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science education. Science Education, 89, 779–802.
Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1063–1086.
Calabrese Barton, A, & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73.
Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 392–414.
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187–1218.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44, 1–39.
Chin, P., Munby, H., Hutchinson, N. L., Taylor, J., & Clark, F. (2004). Where’s the science? Understanding the form and function of workplace science. In E. Scanlon, P. Murphy, J. Thomas, & E. Whitelegg (Eds.), Reconsidering science learning (pp. 118–134). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Chin, P., Zanibbi, M., Dalgarno, N., Poth, C., & Ayala, G. (2007). Teaching science for the workplace? An analysis of Canadian science curriculum documents. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 7, 107–132.
Chinn, P. W. U. (2007). Decolonizing methodologies and Indigenous knowledge: The role of culture, place and personal experience in professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1247–1268.
Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 471–486.
Costa, V. (1997). How teacher and students study ‘all that matters’ in high school chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 1005–1023.
Daniell, E. (2006). Every other Thursday: Stories and strategies from successful woman scientists. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dori, Y. J., & Tal, R. T. (2000). Formal and informal collaborative projects: Engaging in industry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84, 95–113.
Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2002). What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education, 24, 661–679.
Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. (1996). Creating the conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 261–295.
Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Education Review, 66, 1–26.
Fensham, P. J. (1993). Academic influence on school science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 53–64.
Fensham, P. J. (2007). Values in the measurement of students’ science achievement in TIMSS and PISA. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 215–229). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 279–296.
Frederick, W. A. (1991). Science and technology education: An engineer’s perspective. In S. K. Majumdar, L. M. Rosenfeld, P. A. Rubba, E. W. Miller, & R. F. Schmalz (Eds.), Science education in the United States: Issues, crises and priorities (pp. 386–393). Easton: The Pennsylvania Academy of Science.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemman.
Hildebrand, G. M. (2007). Diversity, values and the science curriculum. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 45–60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hodson, D. (2006). What we should prioritize learning about science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6, 293–311.
Hodson, D. (2009). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers’ guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hunt, A., & Millar, R. (2000). AS science for public understanding. Oxford: Heinemann.
Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2007). Developing scientific literacy: Using news media in the classroom. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91, 805–821.
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). ‘To trust or not to trust, …’—pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 877–901.
Kortland, J. (2001). A problem posing approach to teaching decision making about the waste issue. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht Cdβ Press.
Larochelle, M. (2007). Disciplinary power and the school form. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 711–720.
Larson, J. O. (1995, April). Fatima’s rules and other elements of an unintended chemistry curriculum. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco.
Law, N. (2002). Scientific literacy: Charting the terrains of a multifaceted enterprise. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2, 151–176.
Lee, Y-C. (2008). Exploring the roles and nature of science: A case study of severe acute respiratory syndrome. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 515–541.
Löfgren, L., & Helldén, G. (2009). A longitudinal study showing how students use a molecule concept when explaining everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1631–1655.
Loughran, J., & Derry, N. (1997). Researching teaching for understanding: The students’ perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 925–938.
Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: Putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36, 285–311.
Malcolm, C. (2007). The value of science in African cultures. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 61–76). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Malone, K. R., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93, 485–510.
Medina-Jerez, W. (2008). Between local culture and school science: The case of provincial and urban students from eastern Colombia. Research in Science Education, 38, 189–212.
Milne, C. E., & Taylor, P. C. (1998). Between myth and a hard place. In W. W. Cobern (Ed.), Socio-cultural perspectives on science education (pp. 25–48). Boston: Kluwer.
Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–442.
Munby, H., Taylor, J., Chin, P., & Hutchinson, N. L. (2007). Co-op students’ access to shared knowledge in science-rich workplaces. Science Education, 91, 115–132.
Naughton, W., Schreck, J., & Heikkinen, H. (2008). Seeking evidence for “curricular relevancy” within undergraduate liberal arts chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 174–196.
Nieswandt, M., & Shanahan, M-C. (2008). “I just want the credit!”—Perceived instrumentality as the main characteristic of boys’ motivation in a grade 11 science course. Research in Science Education, 38, 3–29.
OECD. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies policy report. Paris: OECD.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M. W., van Driel, J. H., & Pilot, A. (2008). Selection of authentic modelling practices as contexts for chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1867–1890.
Reiss, M. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school science education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 13–28). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Rodrigues, S. (2006). Pupil-appropriate contexts in science lessons: The relationship between themes, purpose and dialogue. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24, 173–182.
Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1–42.
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45, 1–42.
Sadler, P. M., & Tai, R. H. (2001). Success in introductory college physics: The role of high school preparation. Science Education, 85, 111–136.
Schreiner, C., & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction: Two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 231–247). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shanahan, M-C. (2009). Identity in science learning: Exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity. Studies in Science Education, 45, 43–64.
Sillitoe, P. (Ed.). (2007). Local science vs. global science: Approaches to Indigenous knowledge in international development. New York: Berghan Books.
Symington, D., & Tytler, R. (2004). Community leaders’ views of the purposes of science in the compulsory years of schooling. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 1403–1418.
Tobias, S. (1990). They’re not dumb, they’re different. Tucson: Research Corporation.
Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science and Education, 6, 355–371.
Tobin, K., Seiler, G., & Smith, M. W. (1999). Educating science teachers for the sociocultural diversity of urban schools. Research in Science Education, 29, 69–88.
von Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 101–131.
Weinstein, M. (1998). Playing the paramecium: Science education from the stance of the cultural studies of science. Educational Policy, 12, 484–506.
Weinstein, M. (2008). Finding science in the school body: Reflections on transgressing the boundaries of science education and the social studies of science. Science Education, 92, 389–403.
Wood, N. B., Lawrenz, F., & Haroldson, R. (2009). A judicial presentation of evidence of a student culture of “Dealing.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 421–441.
Yager, R. E., & Krajcik, J. (1989). Success of students in a college physics course with and without experiencing a high school course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 599–608.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aikenhead, G. (2011). Towards a Cultural View on Quality Science Teaching. In: Corrigan, D., Dillon, J., Gunstone, R. (eds) The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3926-2
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3927-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)