Skip to main content

Obstacles to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Small Urban Wind Turbines in the Netherlands

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration

Abstract

In this chapter, we combine the ‘functions of innovation systems’ approach and the ‘socio-technical systems’ approach. We first consider whether seven functions of the innovation system surrounding the technology have been fulfilled: market formation, entrepreneurial activity, knowledge creation, knowledge diffusion, mobilisation of resources, presence of advocacy coalitions, and guidance of the search. We then investigate the availability of a ‘space’ for this new niche technology within the incumbent energy system. We apply our framework to the development and implementation of small urban wind turbines in the Netherlands in the period 2000–2007. We show that critical functions, such as knowledge diffusion and market formation, were underdeveloped and that serious bottlenecks were present in the incumbent energy system. Based on this case study, we formulate implications for collaboration and for policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Most analyses based on the functions of innovation systems do not mention these types of resources. It is nonetheless a crucial factor in the development of certain technology. The current shortage of silicon in the Japanese photovoltaic solar power innovation system is one good example.

  2. 2.

    Because of space constraints in this chapter, we describe our analysis in a very concise manner. For a more extensive case description and analysis, see Kamp and Jerotijevic (forthcoming) or contact the author.

  3. 3.

    The majority of the case study material was collected by Milutin Jerotijevic, an MSc student in Civil Engineering at TU Delft.

  4. 4.

    TNO is a Dutch research institute. The abbreviation stands for Applied Scientific Research (Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek).

  5. 5.

    ECN is a Dutch research institute. The abbreviation stands for Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (Energie onderzoekscentrum Nederland).

  6. 6.

    S.D.E. – Stimulation of Sustainable Energy Production E.I.A. – Energy Investment Deduction for profit-making organisations (Wineur, 2006a) M.E.P. – Electricity Generation Environmental Quality: applies to the total energy generated by a renewable energy installation (Wineur, 2006a)

References

  • Carlsson, B., & Stanckiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1, 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and sociotechnical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2008). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analyzing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogma, R. (2000) Exploring technological niches. Enschede: Academic Thesis Twente University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. (2004). Transforming the energy sector: The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5), 815–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, L. M. (2002). Learning in wind turbine developmentA comparison between the Netherlands and Denmark. Utrecht: Academic Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, L. M., & Jerotijevic, M. (forthcoming). A functions of innovation systems analysis of the development and implementation of small urban wind turbines in the Netherlands. Technological forecasting and social change, submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, L. M., Smits, R. E. H. M., & Andriesse, C. D. (2004). Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energy Policy, 32 (14), 1625–1637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10 (2), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation – Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negro, S. O., Hekkert, M. P., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion – A functional analysis. Energy Policy, 35 (2), 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, R. P. J. M. (2005). Strategic niche management for biomass. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahal, D. (1981). Patterns of innovation. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, G. C. (2002). Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 30 (4), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbong, G., & Geels, F. (2007). Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy, 35 (2), 1025–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vries de, A., & Horst van der, M. (2006). Wind energy: Integration in structures. Eindhoven: University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineur. (2006a). Wind Energy Integration in the Urban Environment, Techno-Economic Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineur. (2006b). Wind Energy Integration in the Urban Environment: Administrative and Planning Issues, Netherlands Country Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineur. (2007). Guidelines for small wind turbine in the built environment.

    Google Scholar 

Interviews

  • – Cace, J. (2007), owner, Renewable Energy Company

    Google Scholar 

  • – Klimbie, B. (2007), sales manager, Fortis Wind Energy

    Google Scholar 

  • – Kloesmeijer, M. (2007), sales manager, Wind Energy Solutions

    Google Scholar 

  • – Masselink, P. (2007), consultant, Senternovem

    Google Scholar 

  • – Plumb, H. (2007), Assistant Professor, Architecture Faculty TU Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • – Sidler, D. (2007), owner, Turby B.V

    Google Scholar 

  • – Ummels, B. C. (2007), PhD, Electrical Engineering Faculty TU Delft

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda M. Kamp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamp, L.M. (2010). Obstacles to and Facilitators of the Implementation of Small Urban Wind Turbines in the Netherlands. In: Sarkis, J., Cordeiro, J., Vazquez Brust, D. (eds) Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3159-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics