Skip to main content

Differential herbivory tolerance of dominant and subordinate plant species along gradients of nutrient availability and competition

  • Chapter
Herbaceous Plant Ecology
  • 1600 Accesses

Abstract

We tested whether differences in the herbivory tolerance of plant species is related to their abundance in grassland communities and how herbivory and nutrient availability affect competitive balances among plant species through changes in their tolerance. The experimental approach involved a simulated grazing treatment (clipping) of two competitive grass species (Arrhenatherum elatius and Holcus lanatus) and two subordinate forb species (Prunella vulgaris and Lotus corniculatus) along a gradient of nutrient availability and under conditions of competition. Total standing, aboveground, root, and regrowth biomass were evaluated at the end of the experiment as an estimate of the capacity to compensate for twice removing aboveground biomass at different nutrient levels (NPK). Although clipping had a more pronounced negative effect on dominant plant species (Arrhenatherum and Holcus) than on subordinate species, the negative effects on dominant species were offset by the application of fertilizer. The combined effect of fertilizer and competition had more negative effects on the performance of Lotus and Prunella than on the dominant species. In terms of competition, the regrowth ability of Arrhenatherum and Holcus increased with the application of fertilizer, while the opposite pattern was observed for Lotus and Prunella. The addition of fertilizer has a positive effect on both grass species in terms of growth in clipped pots and competition, while subordinate species did not respond to the addition of fertilizer to the clipped pots and were negatively affected by competition with both grass species. The results suggest (1) that species replacement towards subordinate species as a function of herbivory is partially dependent on the herbivory tolerance of that species, (2) competitive relations between competitive grass species and subordinate forb species change under different environmental conditions, and (3) although grazing disturbance significantly influences competitive relations in favor of less competitive species, increasing nutrient levels counteract the negative effect of grazing on dominant competitive plant species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson VJ, Briske DD (1995) Herbivore-induced species replacement in grasslands: is it driven by herbivory tolerance or avoidance? Ecol Appl 5:1014–1024. doi:10.2307/2269351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ash AJ, McIvor JG (1998) How season of grazing and herbivore selectivity influence monsoon tallgrass communities of northern Australia. J Veg Sci 9:123–132. doi:10.2307/3237230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine DJ, McNaughton SJ (1998) Ungulate effects in the functional species composition of plant communities: herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J Wildl Manag 62:1165–1183. doi:10.2307/3801981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsky AJ, Carson WP, Jensen CL, Fox GA (1993) Overcompensation by plants: herbivore optimization or red herring? Evol Ecol 7:109–121. doi:10.1007/BF01237737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briske DD (1996) Strategies of plant survival in grazed systems: a functional interpretation. In: Hodgson J, Illius AW (eds) The ecology and management of grazing systems. CAB Int, Wallingford, pp 37–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1990) Rabbit grazing, plant competition and seedling recruitment in acid grassland. J Appl Ecol 27:803–820. doi:10.2307/2404378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1997) Plant-herbivore dynamics. In: Crawley MJ (ed) Plant ecology, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mazancourt C, Loreau M, Abbadie L (1999) Grazing optimization and nutrient cycling: potential impact of large herbivores in a savanna system. Ecol Appl 9:784–797. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0784:GOANCP]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del-Val E, Crawley MJ (2004) Interspecific competition and tolerance of defoliation in four grassland species. Can J Bot 82(7):871–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del-Val E, Crawley MJ (2005) Are grazing increaser species better tolerators than decreasers? An experimental assessment of defoliation tolerance in eight British grassland species. J Ecol 93:1005–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison AM (1987) Effects of competition, disturbance, and herbivory on Salicornia europaea. Ecology 68:576–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler NL, Rausher MD (1985) Joint effects of competitors and herbivores on growth and reproduction in Aristolochia reticulata. Ecology 66:1580–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendon BC, Briske DD (2002) Relative herbivory tolerance and competitive ability in two dominant: subordinate pairs of perennial grasses in a native grassland. Plant Ecol 160:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhta AP, Hellstrom K, Rautio P, Tuomi J (2000) A test of the compensatory continuum: fertilization increases and below-ground competition decreases the grazing tolerance of tall wormseed mustard (Erysimum stictum). Evol Ecol 14:353–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman J, Grover JP, van der Wal R, van Andel J (1999) Competition for light, plant species-replacement and herbivore abundance along productivity gradients. In: Olff H, Brown VK, Drent R (eds) Herbivores: between plants and predators. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijper DPJ, Dubbeld J, Bakker JP (2005) Competition between two grass species with and without grazing over a productivity gradient. Plant Ecol 179:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauda SM, Keeler KH, Holt RD (1990) Herbivore influences on plant performance and competitive interactions. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego pp 413–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Bazzaz FA (1980) Effects of defoliation and competition on growth and reproduction in the annual plant Abutilon theophrasti. J Ecol 68:813–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski J, Whitham TG (1989) The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. Am Nat 134:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defence strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newingham BA, Boquien G, Choler P, Callaway RM (2005) Effects of Festuca paniculata on the compensatory growth response of Centaurea uniflora in the French Alps. Plant Ecol 176:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olff H, Ritchie ME, Prins HTH (2002) Global environmental controls of diversity in large herbivores. Nature 415:901–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacala SW, Crawley MJ (1992) Herbivores and plant diversity. Am Nat 140:243–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paige KN, Whitham TG (1987) Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. Am Nat 129:407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prins AH, Verkaar HJ, van den Herik M (1989) Responses of Cynoglossum offıcinale L.and Senecio jacobaea L. to various degrees of defoliation. New Phytol 111:725–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie ME, Olff H (1999) Herbivore diversity and plant dynamics: compensatory and additive effects. In: Olff H, Brown VK, Drent R (eds) Herbivores: between plants and predators. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez MA, Brown VK (1998) Plant competition and slug herbivory: effects on the yield and biomass allocation pattern of Poa annua L. Acta Oecol 19:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal JP, Kotanen PM (1994) Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory. Tree 9:145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi Kohyani P, Bossuyt B, Bonte D, Hoffmann M (2008a) The importance of grazing and soil acidity for plant community composition and community-wide trait characterization in coastal dune grasslands. Appl Veg Sci 11:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi Kohyani P, Bossuyt B, Bonte D, Hoffmann M (2008b) Grazing as a management tool in dune grasslands: evidence of soil and scale dependence of the effect of large herbivores on plant diversity. Biol Conserv 141:1687–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1982) Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Meijden E, Wijn M, Verkaar HJ (1988) Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. Oikos 51:355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal R, Egas M, Van der Veen A, Bakker J (2000) Effects of resource competition and herbivory on plant performance along a natural productivity gradient. J Ecol 88:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitham TG, Maschinski J, Larson KC, Paige KN (1991) Plant responses to herbivory: the continuum from negative to positive and underlying physiological mechanisms. In: Price PW, Lewinsohn TM, Fernandes GW, Benson WW (eds) Plant–animal interactions: evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. Wiley, New York, pp 227–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG (2005) Beyond the compensatory continuum: environmental resource levels and plant tolerance of herbivory. Oikos 109:417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pejman Tahmasebi Kohyani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tahmasebi Kohyani, P., Bossuyt, B., Bonte, D., Hoffmann, M. (2008). Differential herbivory tolerance of dominant and subordinate plant species along gradients of nutrient availability and competition. In: Van der Valk, A.G. (eds) Herbaceous Plant Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2798-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics