Skip to main content

Ecophysiological responses of nine floodplain meadow species to changing hydrological conditions

  • Chapter
Herbaceous Plant Ecology

Abstract

Here, we investigated how species from different floodplain meadow plant communities differ in their ecophysiological responses to an abrupt change in hydrological conditions. We simulated two contrasting hydrological scenarios for 5 weeks under controlled conditions: the waterlogging of a mesophilic species mixture (flooding scenario) and the drying of a hygrophilic species mixture (drying scenario). The mesophilic mixture was composed of three characteristic species of dry habitats (dry species) and three indifferent species with regard to the hydrological conditions; the hygrophilic mixture was composed of three characteristic species of wet habitats (wet species) and the same three indifferent species. The flooding scenario induced a significant decrease in photochemical efficiency (F v/F m) of all species for at least one day, and four of these species did not readjust their F v/F m at the end of the experiment. The F v/F m of four species was significantly reduced by the drying scenario, but was readjusted within the time of the experiment. Significant leaf plastic responses were mainly detected under the drying scenario, through increasing specific leaf area (SLA) and decreasing leaf dry matter content (LDMC) for two indifferent species, and through decreasing SLA and increasing LDMC for two wet species. Finally, the flooding scenario significantly decreased the aboveground biomass of one dry species, but increased the aboveground biomass of the three indifferent species, suggesting an acclimation response to waterlogging through increasing shoot/root ratio. Since the dry species did not show ecophysiological acclimation to changing hydrological conditions (in contrast to the wet species and the indifferent species), this study demonstrated that mesophilic meadow communities should be particularly affected by a change from dry to wet conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alpert P, Simms EL (2002) Relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol 16:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin MP (1980) Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetation 42:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA (1996) Plants in changing environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks SS, Palmer MA, Cardinale BJ et al (2002) Assessing stream ecosystem rehabilitation: limitations of community structure data. Restor Ecol 10:156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budelsky RA, Galatowitsch SM (2000) Effects of water regime and competition on the establishment of a native sedge in restored wetlands. J Appl Ecol 37:971–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova MT, Brock MA (2000) How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities? Plant Ecol 147:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford RMM (1996) Whole plant adaptations to fluctuating water tables. Folia Geobot Phytotax 31:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford RMM, Brändle R (1996) Oxygen deprivation stress in a changing environment. J Exp Bot 47:145–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dale MP, Causton DR (1992) The ecophysiology of Veronica chamaedrys, V. montana and V. officinalis. II. The interaction of irradiance and water regime. J Ecol 80:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dat JF, Capelli N, Folzer H et al (2004) Sensing and signalling during plant flooding. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:273–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Foucault B (1984) Systématique, structuralisme et synsystématique des prairies hygrophiles des plaines atlantiques françaises. Université de Rouen, Rouen

    Google Scholar 

  • De Foucault B (1989) Structure formelle fonctionnelle des systèmes prairiaux mésophiles. Applications agronomiques. In: Gehu J-M (ed) Colloques Phytosociologiques XVI: “Phytosociologie et Pastoralisme”. J. Cramer, Paris, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore AJ, Mustard JF, Manning SJ (2003) Regional patterns of great basin community response to changes in water resources. Ecol Appl 13:443–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes JC, Watson RD (1992) Plants in agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbey C, Thiébaut G, Muller S (2004) Morphological plasticity in a spreading aquatic macrophyte, Ranunculus peltatus, in response to environmental variables. Plant Ecol 173:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E, Shipley B, Roumet C et al (2001) A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content. Funct Ecol 15:688–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgieva K, Lichtenthaler HK (1999) Photosynthetic activity and acclimation ability of pea plants to low and high temperature treatment as studied by means of chlorophyll fluorescence. J Plant Physiol 155:416–423

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll S et al (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation to new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ (2002) Ecological constraints on the evolution of plasticity in plants. Evol Ecol 16:213–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowing DJG, Spoor G (1998) The effect of water table depth on the distribution of plant species on lowland wet grassland. In: Bailey RG, José PV, Sherwood BR (eds) United Kingdom floodplains. Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, Otley, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace JB (1990) On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevilliot F, Krebs L, Muller S (1998) Comparative importance and interference of hydrological conditions and soil nutrient gradients in floristic biodiversity in flood meadows. Biodivers Conserv 7:1495–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1979) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Insausti P, Grimoldi AA, Chaneton EJ et al (2001) Flooding induces a suite of adaptive plastic responses in the grass Paspalum dilatatum. New Phytol 152:291–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones H (1998) Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration. J Exp Bot 49:387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce CB, Wade PM (1998) European wet grasslands: biodiversity, management and restoration. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalapos T, van Den Boogaard R, Lambers H (1996) Effect of soil drying on growth, biomass allocation and leaf gas exchange of two annual grass species. Plant Soil 185:137–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1990) Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities. In: Grace JB, Tilman D (eds) Perspectives on plant competition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 266–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenssen JPM, De Kroon H (2005) Abiotic constraints at the upper boundaries of two Rumex species on a freshwater flooding gradient. J Ecol 93:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreti J, Oesterheld M (1996) Intraspecific variation in the resistance to flooding and drought in populations of Paspalum dilatatum from different topographic positions. Oecologia 108:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milberg P, Andersson L (1998) Does cold stratification level out differences in seed germinability between populations? Plant Ecol 134:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RC, Zedler JB (2003) Responses of native and invasive wetland plants to hydroperiod and water depth. Plant Ecol 167:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller S (2000) Appropriate agricultural management practices required to ensure conservation and biodiversity of environmentally sensitive grasslands sites designated under Natura 2000. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:261–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller S, Dutoit T, Alard D et al (1998) Restoration and rehabilitation of species-rich grassland ecosystems in France: a review. Restor Ecol 6:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson C, Berggren K (2000) Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. Bioscience 50:783–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parolin P (2001) Morphological and physiological adjustments to waterlogging and drought in seedlings of Amazonian floodplain trees. Oecologia 128:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SC, Callaway RM (1992) Salt marsh plant zonation: the importance and intensity of competition and physical factors. Ecology 73:681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peñuelas J, Munné-Bosch S, Llusià J et al (2004) Leaf reflectance and photo- and antioxidant protection in field-grown summer-stressed Phillyrea angustifolia. Optical signals of oxidative stress. New Phytol 162:115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister L, Humbert J, Hoffmann L (2000) Recent trends in rainfall-runoff characteristics in the Alzette river basin, Luxembourg. Clim Change 45:323–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB et al (1997) The natural flow regime: a new paradigm for riverine conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel SL, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (1996) Human appropriation of renewable fresh water. Science 271:785–788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid B (1992) Phenotypic variation in plants. Evol Trend Plant 6:45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz W, Rave G (1999) The effect of cold stratification and light on the seed germination of temperate sedges (Carex) from various habitats and implications for regenerative strategies. Plant Ecol 144:215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B, Keddy PA, Lefkovitch LP (1991) Mechanisms producing plant zonation along a water depth gradient: a comparison with the exposure gradient. Can J Bot 69:1420–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J, Dodd ME, Gowing DJG et al (1999) Hydrologically defined niches reveal a basis for species richness in plant communities. Nature 400:61–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toogood SE, Joyce CB, Waite S (2008) Response of floodplain grassland plant communities to altered water regimes. Plant Ecol 197:285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Valk AG, Squires L, Welling CH (1994) Assessing the impacts of an increase in water level on wetland vegetation. Ecol Appl 4:525–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eck WHJM, van de Steeg HM, Blom CWPM et al (2004) Is tolerance to summer flooding correlated with distribution patterns in river floodplains? A comparative study of 20 terrestrial grassland species. Oikos 107:393–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartapetian BB, Jackson MB (1997) Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Ann Bot (Lond) 79:3–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vervuren PJA, Blom CWPM, de Kroon H (2003) Extreme flooding events on the Rhine and the survival and distribution of riparian plant species. J Ecol 91:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voesenek LACJ, Colmer TD, Pierik R et al (2006) How plants cope with complete submergence. New Phytol 170:213–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Jung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 6 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jung, V., Hoffmann, L., Muller, S. (2008). Ecophysiological responses of nine floodplain meadow species to changing hydrological conditions. In: Van der Valk, A.G. (eds) Herbaceous Plant Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2798-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics