Skip to main content
  • 785 Accesses

Riassunto

La sicurezza del paziente si è dimostrata essere un tema difficile da affrontare dal punto di vista culturale, tecnico, clinico e psicologico, oltre che per la sua importante portata e vastità. Esiste un consenso generale sul fatto che non siano stati ad oggi raggiunti gli ambiziosi obiettivi degli anni precedenti e si potrebbero fare varie considerazioni sul perché questo non sia avvenuto. Vi sono ad oggi limitate evidenze scientifiche che dimostrano che i livelli di sicurezza per i pazienti siano migliorati e, al contempo, ve ne sono invece molte che dimostrano che i pazienti sono in realtà meno sicuri [1, 2]. Gli esperti in tema di sicurezza del paziente generalmente affermano che vi sono stati progressi in alcuni settori, quali nell’utilizzo del sistema di incident reporting, nel ruolo svolto dalle autorità di regolamentazione e dagli organismi professionali.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Landrigan CP, Parry GJ, Bones CB et al (2010) Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med 363(22):2124–2134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wachter RM (2004) The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after “To err is human”. Health Affairs Suppl Web Exclusives:W4-534-45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vincent CA (1989) Research into medical accidents: a case of negligence? BMJ 299(6708):1150–1153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vincent C (2010) Patient safety, 2nd edn. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook RI (2005) Lessons from the war on cancer: the need for basic research on safety. Journal of Patient Safety 1(1):7–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vincent C (2013) Science and patient safety. Can Med Assoc J 185:110–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Vries EN, Ramrattan MA, Smorenburg SM et al (2008) The incidence and nature of inhospital adverse events: a systematic review. Qual Saf Health Care 17(3):216–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vincent C, Aylin P, Franklin BD et al (2008) Is health care getting safer? BMJ 337:a2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christian CK, Gustavson ML, Roth EM et al (2006) A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery 139(2):159–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hull L, Arora S, Kassab E et al (2011) Observational teamwork assessment for surgery: content validation and tool refinement. J Am Coll Surg 212(2):234–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Vries EN, Hollmann MW, Smorenburg SM et al (2009) Development and validation of the SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist. Qual Saf Health Care 18(2):121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S et al (2006) An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. New Engl J Med 355(26):2725–2732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New Engl J Med 360(5):491–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker GR, MacIntosh-Murray A, Porcellato C et al (2008) High performing healthcare systems. Delivering quality by design. Longwoods, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  15. Benn J, Burnett S, Parand A et al (2012) Factors predicting change in hospital safety climate and capability in a multi-site patient safety collaborative: a longitudinal survey study. BMJ Qual Saf 21(7):559–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Benning A, Dixon-Woods M, Nwulu U et al (2011) Multiple component patient safety intervention in English hospitals: controlled evaluation of second phase. BMJ 342:d199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michel P, Quenon JL, Djihoud A et al (2007) French national survey of inpatient adverse events prospectively assessed with ward staff. Qual Saf Health Care 16(5):369–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Amalberti R, Benhamou D, Auroy Y et al (2011) Adverse events in medicine: easy to count, complicated to understand, and complex to prevent. J Biomed Inform 44:390–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagpal K, Arora S, Vats A et al (2012) Failures in communication and information transfer across the surgical care pathway: interview study. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000886

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beatty PC, Beatty SF (2004) Anaesthetists’ intentions to violate safety guidelines. Anaesthesia 59(6):528–540

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Carthey J, Walker S, Deelchand V et al (2011) Breaking the rules: understanding non-compliance with policies and guidelines. BMJ 343:d5283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis RE, Koutantji M Vincent CA (2008) How willing are patients to question healthcare staff on issues related to the quality and safety of their healthcare? An exploratory study. Qual Saf Health Care 17(2):90–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wears RL, Berg M (2005) Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. JAMA 293(10):1261–1263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Allen Lane, London, p 499

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dixon-Woods M, Bosk CL, Aveling EL et al (2011) Explaining Michigan: developing an ex post theory of a quality improvement program. Milbank Q 89(2):167–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arora S, Tierney T, Sevdalis N et al (2010) The Imperial Stress Assessment Tool (ISAT): a feasible, reliable and valid approach to measuring stress in the operating room. World J Surg 34(8):1756–1763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parand A, Benn J, Burnett S et al (2012) Strategies for sustaining a quality improvement collaborative and its patient safety gains. Int J Qual Health C 24(4):380–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Burnett S, Franklin BD, Moorthy K et al (2012) How reliable are clinical systems in the UK NHS? A study of seven NHS organisations. BMJ Qual Saf. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000442

    Google Scholar 

  29. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA et al (1999) A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. New Engl J Med 340(9):669–676

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vincent C, Batalden P, Davidoff F (2011) Multidisciplinary centres for safety and quality improvement: learning from climate change science. BMJ Qual Saf 20(Suppl 1):i73–i78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles Vincent .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vincent, C. (2013). Introduzione. In: Tartaglia, R., Vannucci, A. (eds) Prevenire gli eventi avversi nella pratica clinica. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5450-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-5450-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-5449-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-5450-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics