Abstract
After reviewing the literature and analysing the findings, these latter can be compared and grouped in order to define the results and the critical implementation factors of the six systems. Along with the results and benefits, eight common factors have been found and proposed as shown in the second column from the left in TableĀ 11.1. They are: results and benefits; management style; deployment of the system; employee management, deployment and participation; voice of the customer; tools, techniques and IT; optimisation of the system; day-by-day check and control of the results; review of the system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Drago, R. (1988). Quality circle survival: An exploratory analysis. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 27(3), 336ā351.
Goh, T. N. (2002). A strategic assessment of six sigma. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 18(5), 403ā410.
Harry, M. J., & Schroeder, R. (2000). The breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the worldās top corporations. New York: Doubleday.
Hayward, S. G., Dale, B. G., & Fraser, V. C. M. (1985). Quality circle failure and how to avoid it. European Management Journal, 3(2), 103ā111.
Picken, S. D. B. (1987). Values and value related strategies in Japanese corporate culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(2), 137ā143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2012 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chiarini, A. (2012). Discussion and Comparison About the Common Characteristics. In: From Total Quality Control to Lean Six Sigma. SpringerBriefs in Business. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2658-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2658-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2657-5
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2658-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)