Trade andWage Inequality with Endogenous Skill Formation

  • Brati Sankar Chakraborty
  • Abhirup Sarkar
Conference paper
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)


The present paper develops a two-sector model with one constant returns sector producing basic goods and another increasing returns to scale sector producing fancy goods. A quasi-linear utility function is used to capture the divide between basic and fancy goods. There are two types of productive factors, skilled and unskilled labour, the former working in the skill using fancy goods sector and the latter in the basic good producing sector. Agents differ in their costs of acquiring skill. The model holds possibilities of multiple equilibria and shows that international trade, in spite of equalizing factor prices, also increases the skill premium in all countries.


Skilled Labour Intermediate Good Wage Inequality Intermediate Input Unskilled Labour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chakraborty, Brati Sankar, Sarkar Abhirup (2007). Trade, Wage Inequality and the Vent for Surplus. In S. Marjit and Eden yu (Eds): Contemporary and Emerging Issues in Trade Theory and Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dixit, A., Stiglitz, J.E. (1977). Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. American Economic Review, 67, 297–308Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., Samuelson, P.A. (1980). Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory with a continuum of goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 203–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ethier, W. J. (1982). National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. American Economic Review, 72, 389–405Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Feenstra, R., and Hanson G. (1996). Foreign investment, outsourcing and relative wages In: R. Feenstra, G. Grossman and D. Irwin (Eds): Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honour of Jagadish Bhagawati. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Helpman, E., Krugman, P. (1985). Market Structure and International Trade. Cambridge, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ide, T., Takayama, A. (1991). Variable Returns to Scale, Paradoxes and Global Correspondence in the Theory of International Trade. In: A. Takayama, M. Ohyama and H. Ohta (Eds): Trade, Policy and International Adjustments. San Diego: Academic Press. 108–154Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, R. W. (1999). Heckscher-Ohlin trade models for the new century. Mimeo, University of RochesterGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krugman, P. (1981). Intra-industry specialization and the gains from trade. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 959–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Samuelson, P.A. (1947). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Samuelson, P.A. (1971). On the Trail of Conventional beliefs about the Transfer Problem. In: J.N. Bhagwati, R.W. Jones, R.A. Mundell and J.Vanek (Eds): Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth: Papers in International Economics in Honor of Charles P. Kindelberger. Amsterdam: North Holland, 327–351Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trefler, D., Zhu, S.C. (2001). Ginis in general equilibrium: Trade, technology and Southern inequality. NBER Working Paper No. 8446Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wong, Kar-yiu (1995). International Trade in Goods and Factor Mobility. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brati Sankar Chakraborty
    • 1
  • Abhirup Sarkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Economic Research UnitIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations