Skip to main content

Service as Artifact: Reconsideration of Value Cocreation

  • Conference paper
Serviceology for Smart Service System (ICServ 2015)

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An artifact, or something made by a human being, can create value through mutual interaction among providers, consumers, and other artifacts. Moreover, an artifact can alter its nature to products or services according to the information completeness of its purpose and environment. This paper presents a discussion of how value is cocreated in a society by considering some relevant concepts or theories for “cocreation” such as emergent synthesis, the theory of “ba,” coproduction, and service-dominant logic (SDL). Additionally, the value of a service is reconsidered from the perspective of economic or behavioral value. Finally, this paper presents discussion of the new role of science and technologies to cocreate value in a sustainable society through mutual interaction among consumers and producers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, C., 2009, The Research on the Interaction Development between the Producer Services and Manufacturing Industry. International Business Research, 2(3):92–97

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshikawa, H., 1992, Proposal for Artifactual Engineering: Aims to Make Science and Technology Self-Conclusive, ILLUME, A TEPCO Semiannual Review, Tokyo Electric Power Co., 41–56

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simon, H. A. The sciences of the artificial., 1996, Vol. 136. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ota, J., Nishino, N., Hara, T., Fujita, T., New research trends in artifactology – Modeling of individuals and socialization technology –, 2014, Synthesiology, 7(4): 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (Eds.), 2002, Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freud, R., 2012, Co-Creation and Bottom-Up Economy, Keynote of the 5th International Conference on Mass Customization and Personalization in Central Europe (MCP - CE 2012), http://www.robertfreund.de/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/MCP-CE-2012-Freund.pdf

  7. Ueda K, Takenaka T, Vancza J, Monostori L., 2009, Value Creation and Decision-Making in Collaborative Society, Annals of CIRP 58(2):681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueda K., 2000, Emergent Synthesis, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 15/4:319–320.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshikawa, H., 2008, Synthesiology as sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3/2:169–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Langton, C., 1998, Artificial Life, Santa Fe Institute study in the science of Complexity 1, Proceedings, Redwood City, CA, Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holland, J., Adaptation in neural and artificial systems, 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ueda, K., Makus, A., Monostori, L., Kals, H.J.J., and Arai, T., 2001, Emergent synthesis methodologies for manufacturing. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 50/2:535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ueda, K., Vaario, J. and Fujii, N., 1998. Interactive Manufacturing: Human Aspects for Biological Manufacturing Systems. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 47/1:389–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ueda, K. and Takenaka, T., 2007, Classification of service model and value creation. Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology Tokyo, Japan: 497–498.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shimizu H., 2000, Ba and Co-creation, NTT publisher, (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saft, S, 2014, Rethinking Western individualism from the perspective of social interaction and from the concept of ba. Journal of Pragmatics, 69:108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ueda, K., 1996, Differentiation of the Realms of Artifacts and Information: How Does It Relate to Parts/Whole and Inside/Outside?, Artificial Life V, MIT Press, 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ueda, K., Kito, T., and Takenaka, T., 2008, Modelling of Value Creation Based on Emergent Synthesis. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 57/1:473–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ueda, K., and Kuroda, A. (Eds.), 2004, What is co-creation, Baifukan (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prahalad, C.K., and Ramaswamy, V., 2000, Co-opting customer competence, Harvard Business Review, 78(1): 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V., 2001, The co-creation connection, Strategy and Business, 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V., 2004, The Future of Competition: Co-creating Unique Value with Customers. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., 2006. Service-dominant logic: what it is, what it is not, what it might be. In: Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L. (Eds.), The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, pp. 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chathoth P, Altinay L, Harrington R.J, Okumus F, Chan E.S.W., 2013, Co-production versus co-creation: A process based continuum in the hotel service context. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32:11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., 2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68 (1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Technical Committee on Co-creation System, the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers in Japan, http://www.sice.jp/wp-content/uploads/file/org/D9.pdf

  27. Yoshikawa, H., 2008, Introduction to theory of service engineering – Framework for theoretical study of service engineering –, Synthesiology, 1(2): 111–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Shimomura, Y. and Tomiyama, T., 2005, Service modelling for service engineering, FIP International Federation for Information Processing,168:31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Arai, T. and Shimomura, Y., 2005, Service CAD System – Evaluation and Quantification. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 54/1:463–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spohrer, J. and Maglio, P.P., 2008. The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3):238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vargo S.L., Maglio P.P., Akaka M.A., 2008, On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26:145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Valenstein, A.F., 1989, Pre-oedipal reconstructions in Psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 70:433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zuriff, G.E., 2002, Philosophy of behaviorism. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77/3:367–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dobb, M., 1975, Theories of value and distribution since Adam Smith, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L., 2006, Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing theory. 6:281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kowalkowski, C, 2010, What does a service-dominant logic really mean for manufacturing firms? CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 3:285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ueda, K., 2010, System Theory of Research & Development and Innovation: − Synthetic Approach to Value Creation—, Journal of the Japan Society for Precision Engineering, 76(7), 737–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeshi Takenaka .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Japan

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ueda, K., Takenaka, T., Nishino, N. (2017). Service as Artifact: Reconsideration of Value Cocreation. In: Sawatani, Y., Spohrer, J., Kwan, S., Takenaka, T. (eds) Serviceology for Smart Service System. ICServ 2015. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56074-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56074-6_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-56072-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-56074-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics