Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ableitung und Beschreibung der Modellkonstrukte

  • Chapter
Multiprojektmanagement

  • 3998 Accesses

Auszug

Obgleich die Ausgestaltung der Ressourcenallokation und die Auswahl adäquater Koordinationsmaßnahmen den grundlegenden Organisationsfragen zuzurechnen sind und dementsprechend bereits eine intensive Diskussion in der Literatur erfahren haben, wurden diese Themen, wie im letzten Kapitel gezeigt, jedoch bis heute kaum aus dem Blickwinkel des Multiprojektmanagements betrachtet. Diesem Umstand soll durch die Entwicklung eines entsprechenden Untersuchungskonzepts, das in diesem Kapitel näher erläutert wird, Rechnung getragen werden. Im ersten Abschnitt wird der im Rahmen der empirischen Studie zu untersuchende Bezugsrahmen genauer vorgestellt. In den darauf folgenden Abschnitten werden nacheinander die verwendeten Faktoren und deren Wirkungsbeziehungen und Messkonzepte detailliert beschrieben, wobei in der Argumentation primär auf empirisch großzahlige Arbeiten zurückgegriffen wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Kubicek, H.; G. Welter (1985): Messung der Organisationsstruktur. Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart. S. 798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley. S. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, R. E.; J. Thomsen; T. R. Christiansen; J. C. Kunz; et al. (1999): Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Management Science 45(11), 1479–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A. (1999): Organisationstheorien. 3. Aufl., Kohlhammer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1996): The concept of project complexity — a review. International Journal of Project Management 14(4), S. 202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1996): The concept of project complexity — a review. International Journal of Project Management 14(4), 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. L. C. (1983): Interdependence and coordination in organizations — A role-system analysis. Academy of Management Journal 26(1), 156–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley. S. 10 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J. (1991): Zur Messung des Innovationserfolgs. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 61(4), S. 466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K.; J. E. Prescott (1990): Planning and tactical factors in the project implementation process. Journal of Management Studies 27(3), 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J. (2001): One Size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science 47(3), S. 700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, D.: Multi-Projektmanagement in der industriellen Forschung und Entwicklung. Dissertation Universität Kiel (1994). S. 149

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J.; A. Tishler; D. Dvir; S. Lipovetsky; T. Lechler (2002): Refining the search for project success factors: a multivariate, typological approach. R&D Management 32(2), S. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J. (2001): One Size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science 47(3), S. 702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J. (2001): One Size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science 47(3), S. 700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A.; J. R. Hauser (1996): Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(3), 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A.; J. R. Hauser (1996): Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13(3), S. 492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J. (2001): One Size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science 47(3), S. 716 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, D.; A. J. Shenhar (1992): Measuring the success of technology-based strategic business units. Engineering Management Journal 4, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.; E. McLean (1992): Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), S. 61 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.; E. McLean (2003): The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, L. D.; J. S. Pennypacker (1999): Project Portfolio Management. Selecting and Prioritizing Projects for Competitive Advantage. Center of Business Practices. A Division of PM Solutions, Inc., West Chester, PA USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, D. I. (1998): Strategic Project Management. In: J. K. Pinto (Hrsg.): The PMI Project Management Handbook. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantzen-Homp, D.: Projektportfolio-Management: Multiprojektarbeit im Unternehmungswandel. Dissertation Lehrstuhl für Unternehmensführung und Organisation, Universität Gießen Wiesbaden (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbontin, A.; B. Yazdani; R. Cooper; W. E. Souder (1999): New product development success factors in American and British firms. International Journal of Technology Management 17, 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.; S. Edgett; E. Kleinschmidt (2001): Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study. R&D Management 31(4), 361–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; S. J. Edgett (2003): Overcoming the crunch in resources for new product development. Research Technology Management 46(3), 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, P.; P. Lehtonen (2005): Successful management of strategic intentions through multiple projects — Reflections from empirical study. International Journal of Project Management 23(5), S. 388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, P.; P. Lehtonen; L. Lindblom: Management of Product Development and Internal Development Projects: A Comparative Study. In: PMI (Hrsg.): PMI Research Conference 2004. London (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirger, B. J.; M. A. Maidique (1990): A Model of New Product Development: An Empirical Test. Management Science 36(7), S. 878 f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henard, D.; D. Szymanski (2001): Why Some New Products Are More Successful Than Others. Journal of Marketing Research 38(3), S. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S.; D. P. Norton (2006): How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Harvard Business Review 84(3), 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, N. P.; F. Ghasemzadeh (1996): An Integrated Framework for Project Portfolio Selection. International Journal of Project Management 17(4), S. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; S. Edgett; E. Kleinschmidt (1998a): Best Practices for Managing R&D Portfolios. Research Technology Management 41(4), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, P. (2000): The product-process-organisation relationship in complex development projects. Research Policy 29(7), 913–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002): Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K.; P. Rouhiainen (2001): Builing customer-based project organizations. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. S. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J.; J. Covin (1989): Critical factors in project implementation: a comparison of construction and R&D projects. Technovation 9, 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K.; J. Prescott (1988): Variations in success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. Journal of Management 14(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölttä-Otto, K.; C. L. Magee (2006): Estimating Factors Affecting Project Task Size in Product Development — An Empirical Study. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53(1), 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, S.; A. J. Shenhar (2000): Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47(2), 258–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, J.: Marktbasierte interne Ressourcenallokation in der Forschung und Entwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse der Allokationsleistung und Gestaltungsvorschläge für ein internes Marktforum. Dissertation Universität St. Gallen (2005). S. 6 f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, J.: Marktbasierte interne Ressourcenallokation in der Forschung und Entwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse der Allokationsleistung und Gestaltungsvorschläge für ein internes Marktforum. Dissertation Universität St. Gallen (2005). S. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, J.: Marktbasierte interne Ressourcenallokation in der Forschung und Entwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse der Allokationsleistung und Gestaltungsvorschläge für ein internes Marktforum. Dissertation Universität St. Gallen (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, J.: Marktbasierte interne Ressourcenallokation in der Forschung und Entwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse der Allokationsleistung und Gestaltungsvorschläge für ein internes Marktforum. Dissertation Universität St. Gallen (2005). S. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, J.: Marktbasierte interne Ressourcenallokation in der Forschung und Entwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse der Allokationsleistung und Gestaltungsvorschläge für ein internes Marktforum. Dissertation Universität St. Gallen (2005). S. 104 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güttinger, J.: Marktbasierte interne Ressourcenallokation in der Forschung und Entwicklung: Eine empirische Analyse der Allokationsleistung und Gestaltungsvorschläge für ein internes Marktforum. Dissertation Universität St. Gallen (2005). S. 100 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völker, R.; E. Kasper (2004): Interne Märkte in Forschung und Entwicklung. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg. S. 156 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Völker, R.; E. Kasper (2004): Interne Märkte in Forschung und Entwicklung. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg. S. 197 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engwall, M.; A. Jerbrant (2003): The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management?. International Journal of Project Management 21(6), 403–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. B.; D. J. Hickson (1995): Success in decision making: Different Organizations, differing reasons for success. Journal of Management Studies 32(5), 655–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; S. Edgett; E. J. Kleinschmidt (1998b): Portfolio Management for New Product. Perseus Books Group, New York. S. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, W. F.; Y. H. Kwak (2003): In search of innovative techniques to evaluate pharmaceutical R&D projects. Technovation 23(4), 291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillrank, P. (2003): The quality of information. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20(6/7), 691–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.; E. McLean (1992): Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P. B. (1997): A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8(3), 240–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P. B. (1997): A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8(3), 240–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.; E. McLean (2003): The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zboralski, K. (2007): Wissensmanagement durch Communities of Practice. Gabler Edition Wissenschaft. S. 13 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gackowski, Z.: Logical interdependence of data/ information quality dimensions — A purpose-focused view on IQ. In: 9th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ 04’). (2004). S. 126 ff

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann, F.; C. Rolker: Assessment Methods for Information Quality Criteria. Techn. Ber. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (2000). S. 2 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurst, K. (2001): Zusammenarbeit in innovativen Multi-Team-Projekten. Gabler — Edition Wissenschaft, Wiesbaden. S. 139 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balachandra, R.; J. H. Friar (1997): Factors for success in R&D Projects and New Product Innovation: A conceptual framework. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44(3), 276–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002): Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Weiss, M. M.; R. G. Calantone (1994): Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11(5), 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, S. C; K. B. Clark (1992b): Revolutionizing Product Development. The Free Press, New York. S. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K.; J. Prescott (1988): Variations in success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. Journal of Management 14(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K.; J. E. Prescott (1990): Planning and tactical factors in the project implementation process. Journal of Management Studies 27(3), 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G.; T. Lechler (1998): Dynamisches Projektmanagement — Grenzen des formalen Regelwerks. Projektmanagement aktuell 9(2), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbontin, A.; B. Yazdani; R. Cooper; W. E. Souder (1999): New product development success factors in American and British firms. International Journal of Technology Management 17, 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Brentani, U.; E. J. Kleinschmidt (2004): Corporate Culture and Commitment: Impact on Performance of International New Product Development Programs. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21, 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift, T.; M. Vandenbosch (1999): Project complexity and efforts to reduce product development cycle time. Journal of Business Research 45(2), 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (1994): Third-Generation New Product Processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; E. J. Kleinschmidt (1995): Benchmarking the Firm’s Critical Success Factors in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 12(5), 374–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, J.; P. de Weerd-Nederhof; A. Pearson; O. Fisscher (2001): Senior management support in new product development process. Clarity and Innovation Management 10(4), 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglianskas, I.; H. J. Thamhain (2000): Managing technology-based projects in multinational environments. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47(1), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, G. S.; R. B. Skow; K. D. Abel (1999): Practices that support team learning and their impact on speed to market and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16(5), 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, L. K. (1998): Tools and teams: competing models of integrated product development project performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 15(1), 55–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (1997): Social identification effects in product and process development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14(2), 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M.; M. E. Parry (1997): A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States.. Journal of Marketing 61, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swink, M. (2000): Technological innovativeness as a moderator of new product design integration and top management support. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17(3), 208–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swink, M. (2003): Completing projects on-time: How project acceleration affects new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 20(4), 319–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swink, M.; S. Talluri; T. Pandejpong (2006): Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management 24(5), 542–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirger, B. J.; J. L. Hartley (1996): The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43(2), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balachandra, R. (1984): Critical Signals for Making Go/NoGo Decisions in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 1(2), 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balachandra, R. (1989): Early warning signals for R & D projects: how to pick the winners and make your investments pay off. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirger, B. J.; J. L. Hartley (1996): The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 43(2), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. H. (2000): Tightening the belt: methods for reducing development costs associated with new product innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17, 59–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2001): Erfolgsfaktoren neuer Produkte — Grundlagen für eine valide empirische Forschung. Beiträge zur betriebswirtschaftlichen Forschung Gabler, Wiesbaden. S. 309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf, D.; A. Gibson; L. Ozanne (2000): The integration of marketing and logistics functions: an empirical examination of New Zealand firms. Journal of Business Logistics 21(2), 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, X. M.; M. M. MontoyaWeiss; J. B. Schmidt (1997): Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(1), 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thieme, R. J.; X. M. Song; G.-C. Shin (2003): Project Management Characteristics and New Product Survival. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(2), 104–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J. H.; M. Song; A. Stringfellow (2003): Antecedents and consequences of goal incongruity on new product development in five countries: A marketing view. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(3), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J. H.; M. Song; A. Stringfellow (2003): Antecedents and consequences of goal incongruity on new product development in five countries: A marketing view. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(3), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, V.; E. Hartono; A. L. Lederer; V. Sethi (2002): The impact of organizational commitment, senior management involvement, and team involvement on strategic information systems planning. Information and Management 39(6), 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, N. F.; C. G. Marples; A. Suhaimi (1999): The relative success of alternative approaches to strategic information systems planning: an empirical analysis. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8(3), 263–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V.; A. H. Segars (2005): An empirical evaluation of stages of strategic information systems planning: patterns of process design and effectiveness. Information and Management 42(5), 761–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, J.; R. Weber (1996): Information Systems Planning: A Model and Empirical Tests. Management Science 42(7), 1043–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, G. S. (2006): The effect of top management support of SISP on strategic IS management: insights from the US electric power industry. Omega 34(3), 236–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G.; W. R. King (1992): An empirical assessment of information systems planning and the role of information systems in organizations. Journal of Management Information Systems 9(2), 99–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segars, A. H.; V. Grover (1998): Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly 22(2), 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. S. H.; J. S. K. Ang (2001): An examination of major IS problems. International Journal of Information Management 21, 457–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R. A.; Y. L. Doz (2001): The power of strategic integration. MIT Sloan Management Review 42(3), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, M. T.; J. McKay (1992): Balancing the product development process: Achieving product and cycle-time excellence in high technology industries. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9, 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Brentani, U.; E. J. Kleinschmidt (2004): Corporate Culture and Commitment: Impact on Performance of International New Product Development Programs. Journal of Product Innovation Management 21, 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002): Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, J.; P. de Weerd-Nederhof; A. Pearson; O. Fisscher (2001): Senior management support in new product development process. Clarity and Innovation Management 10(4), 234–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K.; J. E. Prescott (1990): Planning and tactical factors in the project implementation process. Journal of Management Studies 27(3), 305–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. (1997): Social identification effects in product and process development teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14(2), 97–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swink, M.; S. Talluri; T. Pandejpong (2006): Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management 24(5), 542–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J. H.; M. Song; A. Stringfellow (2003): Antecedents and consequences of goal incongruity on new product development in five countries: A marketing view. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20(3), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. M.; R. W. Ruekert; O. C. Walker Jr. (2002): Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 19, 233–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goll, I.; R. B. Sambharya; L. Tucci (2001): Top-Management team composition, corporate ideology, and firm performance. Management International Review 41(2), 109–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, B.; K. S. Pawar (2001): Improving the management of concurrent new product development using process modeling and analysis. R&D Management 31(1), 27–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, D.: Multi-Projektmanagement in der industriellen Forschung und Entwicklung. Dissertation Universität Kiel (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam, V.; N. Venkatraman; J. C. Camillus (1986): Multi-objective assessment of effectiveness of strategic planning: A discriminant analysis approach. Academy of Management Journal 29(2), 347–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, N.; V. Ramanujam (1987): Planning System Success — a Conceptualization and an Operational Model. Management Science 33(6), 687–705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002): Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, M. H.; B. Voeten; L. H. Kroep (1999): Human Resource Allocation in a Multiproject Research and Development Environment. International Journal of Project Management 17(3), 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platje, A.; H. Seidel; S. Wadman (1994): Project and portfolio planning cycle: Projectbased management for multiproject challenge. International Journal of Project Management. International Journal of Project Management 12(2), 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A.; K. Nobeoka (1998): Thinking beyond lean. How Multi-Project Management is transforming product development at Toyota and other companies. The Free Press, New York. S. 186 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; S. J. Edgett; E. Kleinschmidt (2004b): Benchmarking best NPD practices — II. Research Technology Management 47(3), 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (1992): Evaluating QFD’s use in U.S. firms as a process for developing products. Journal of Product Innovation Management 9(3), 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (1997b): PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14(6), 429–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundquist, J.; A. Chibba (2004): The use of processes and methods in NPD — A survey of Swedish industry. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 1(1), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; E. Kleinschmidt (2000): New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective. Research Technology Management 34(2), 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; S. J. Edgett; E. J. Kleinschmidt (2002b): Optimizing the stage-gate process: What best-practice companies do-II. Research Technology Management 45(6), 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dröge, C.; J. Jayarma; S. K. Vickery (1999): The Ability to Minimize the Timing of New Product Development and Introduction: An Exanimation of Antecedent Factors in the North American Automobile Supplier Industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management 17(1), 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (1997a): The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time. Journal of Marketing Research 34(1), 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, F. M. (2004): Innovation strategy and the impact of a composite model of service product development on performance. Journal of Service Research 7(2), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert, R. K.; W. E. Souder; A. De Meyer; D. Deschoolmeester (1994): R&D-Marketing Integration Mechanisms, Communicaiton and Flows, and Innovation Sucess. Journal of Product Innovation Management 11, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M. B.; J. K. Pinto; J. E. Prescott (1993): Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science 39(10), 1281–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, M. V.; M. M. Montoya-Weiss (2001): Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science 47(1), 151–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. H.; A. K. Chakrabarti (1996): Innovation Speed: A Conceptual odel of Context, Antecedents and Outcomes. Academy of Management Review 21(4), 1143–1191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, R. T.; J. Kratzer; J. Hollander; J. van Engelen (2002): Managing Product Development Teams. In: P. Belliveau (Hrsg.): The PDMA Toolbook for New Product Development. John Wiley and Sons, 312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, R. T.; J. Kratzer; J. Hollander; J. van Engelen (2002): Managing Product Development Teams. In: P. Belliveau (Hrsg.): The PDMA Toolbook for New Product Development. John Wiley and Sons, 313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liker, J. K.; P. D. Collins; F. M. Hull (1999): Flexibility and Standardization: Test of a Contingency Model of Product Design-Manufacturing Integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16(3), 248–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, M. V.; M. M. Montoya-Weiss (2001): Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science 47(1), 151–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, M. V.; M. M. Montoya-Weiss (2001): Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Science 47(1), 151–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R.; J. R. Hackman (1981): Relationships between organizational structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(1), 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D.; R. J. Kauffman (2004): The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in Management Science. Management Science 50(3), 281–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley. S. 30 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G.; M. S. Poole (1994): Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J.; G. DeSanctis (1995): Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms. Organization Science 6(4), 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, B.; S. L. Jarvenpaa (1991): Applications of global information technology. MIS Quarterly 15(1), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A.; H. Kubicek (1992): Organisation. 3. Aufl., Berlin. S. 354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillquist, J.; J. L. King; C. Woo (2002): A representational scheme for analyzing information technology and organizational dependency. MIS Quarterly 26(2), 91–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K.; M. C. Row (1992): Information technology and industrial cooperation: The changing economics of coordination and ownership. In: Tillquist et al. (2002), 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K.; S. P. Reddi; M. C. Row (1993): The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The move to the middle hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(2), 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowston, K. (1997): A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organization Science 8(2), 157–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurbaxani, V.; S. Whang (1991): The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Communications of the ACM 34(1), 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R. (2001): Cross-Functional Project Groups in research and new product development: Diversity, Communication, Job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 44(3), 547–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk, J.; G. DeSanctis (1995): Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms. Organization Science 6(4), 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, H. C; J. Baroudi (1994): The role of information technology in organization design. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(4), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros, X. A.; M. A. Vonderembse; W. J. Doll (2002): Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities: The effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform synergy. Journal of Operations Management 20(4), 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufteros, X. A.; G. A. Marcoulides (2006): Product development practices and performance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis. International Journal of Production Economics 103(1), 286–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, F. M. (2004): Innovation strategy and the impact of a composite model of service product development on performance. Journal of Service Research 7(2), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langerak, F.; E. J. Hultink (2005): The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(1), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langerak, F.; E. J. Hultink (2005): The impact of new product development acceleration approaches on speed and profitability: Lessons for pioneers and fast followers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(1), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swink, M. (2003): Completing projects on-time: How project acceleration affects new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 20(4), 319–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.; E. McLean (2003): The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.; E. McLean (1992): Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V.; S. Jeong; A. Segars (1996): Information systems effectiveness: the construct space and patterns of application. Information and Management 31(4), 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W.; E. McLean (1992): Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research 3(1), 60–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugumaran, V.; B. Argogyaswamy (2004): Measuring IT performance: Contingency variables and value modes. Journal of Computer Information Systems 44(2), 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. (1986): Task Complexity: definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 60–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. (1986): Task Complexity: definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 60–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vijfeijken, H.; A. Kleingeld; H. van Tuijl; J. A. Algera; H. Thierry (2002): Task complexity and task, goal, and reward interdependence in group performance management: A prescriptive model. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology 11(3), 363–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronner, R. (1992): Komplexität. In: E. Frese (Hrsg.): Handwörterbuch der Organisation. 3. Aufl., 1121–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1996): The concept of project complexity — a review. International Journal of Project Management 14(4), 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. J. (1988): Task Complexity — A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review 13(1), 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift, T.; M. Vandenbosch (1999): Project complexity and efforts to reduce product development cycle time. Journal of Business Research 45(2), 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.; D. Wilemon (2003): Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R&D Management 33(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, E. W.; D. H. Gobeli (1989): Significance of Project Management Structure on Development Success. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 36(2), 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. M. (1999): The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management 17(5), 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, M. V.; S. R. Rosenthal (2000a): Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process. Journal of Operations Management 18(4), 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1996): The concept of project complexity — a review. International Journal of Project Management 14(4), 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, M. V.; S. R. Rosenthal (2000b): Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: A deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47(1), 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. M. (1999): The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management 17(5), 269–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1973): Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley. S. 4 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatikonda, M. V.; S. R. Rosenthal (2000b): Technology novelty, project complexity, and product development project execution success: A deeper look at task uncertainty in product innovation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 47(1), 74–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, A. (1997a): The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time. Journal of Marketing Research 34(1), 24–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.; D. Wilemon (2003): Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R&D Management 33(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, S.; S. D. Eppinger (2001): Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Science 47(1), 189–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuiston, D. H. (1989): Novelty, complexity, and importance as causal determinants of industrial buyer behaviour. Journal of Marketing 53, 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler, L. (2005): The Moderating Effect of Environmental Uncertainty on New Product Development and Time Efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22(3). S. 269 f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1969): The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J. (2001): One Size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science 47(3), 394–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J.; D. Dvir; O. Levy; A. C. Maltz (2001): Project Success: A Multidimensional Strategic Concept. Long Range Planning 34(6), 699–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. R.; A. Speiser (1992): Programme Management and its information systems requirements. International Journal of Project Management 10(4), 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, D.; K. K. Sinha (2002): Toward a theory of project interdependencies in high tech R&D environments. Journal of Operations Management 20(5), 451–468.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr.Th. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Ableitung und Beschreibung der Modellkonstrukte. In: Multiprojektmanagement. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9761-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation