Skip to main content

The Role of Social Media for Luxury Brands—Motives for Consumer Engagement and Opportunities for Business

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Identitätsbasierte Luxusmarkenführung

Abstract

Social Media is omnipresent. Many luxury brands today operate brand pages (i.e., fan pages, video channels) on Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube. However, empirical research on brand pages is still in its infancy. Therefore, this study discuss the potential of social media for luxury brands and shows the effect of brand pages on loyalty and what motivates users to participate.

We start with a research overview referring luxury brands and discuss the central concepts of social media. In the next step we analyze the adequacy of social media for luxury brands. After this theoretical discussion we test a general framework based on the use and gratification theory, customer engagement literature, and the involvement theory. We can show a significant influence from usage intensity and engagement on the brand page on customer loyalty. Furthermore, we identify different values such as functional and hedonic content as drivers of usage and engagement.

The results are interesting for theory and practice. They confirm the positive effect of integration and engagement in general and show that brand pages are more than just a tool to connect brand fans. They are also an instrument for gaining new fans of luxury brands.

Zusammenfassung

Das Thema Social Media ist momentan allgegenwärtig. Viele Luxusmarken betreiben Social Media Markenseiten (z. B. Marken Fanpages, Videokanäle) auf Facebook, Twitter oder YouTube. Trotzdem gibt es bisher kaum Erkenntnisse zur Bedeutung von Social Media Markenseiten. Um diese Lücke für Luxusmarken zu schließen, diskutiert dieser Artikel das Potential von Social Media für Luxusmarken und zeigt Nutzungsmotive auf sowie einen Effekt von Nutzung und Engagement auf die Loyalität.

Wir beginnen mit einem Forschungsüberblick zu Luxusmarken. Im Anschluss diskutieren wir die zentralen Konzepte von Social Media. Danach analysieren wir die Eignung von Social Media für Luxusmarken. Nach dieser theoretischen Diskussion testen wir ein allgemeines Modell, basierend auf dem Uses und Gratifications-Ansatz, Literatur zu Kunden-Engagement und der Involvement Theorie. Als Ergebnis können wir einen signifikanten Effekt von der Nutzungsintensität und einem Engagement auf der Social Media Markenseite auf die Loyalität zeigen. Weiter können wir unterschiedliche Motive wie funktionale und unterhaltende Inhalte als Treiber von Nutzung und Engagement nachweisen.

Die Ergebnisse sind sowohl für die Theorie als auch die Praxis interessant. Sie bestätigen einen positiven Effekt einer Integration und eines Engagements von Kunden und zeigen, dass Social Media Markenseiten nicht nur eine Plattform für bestehende Markenfans sind, sondern auch ein Instrument, um neue Fans von Luxusmarken zu gewinnen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Aaker, D. (1991). Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook. In B. Springer (Hrsg.), International Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Cambridge, UK, 2006 (pp. 1–16)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adjei, M. T., Noble, S. M., & Noble, C. H. (2010). The Influence of C2C Communications in Online Brand Communities on Customer Purchase Behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(5), 634–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The Social Influence of Brand Community: Evidence from European Car Clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry, C. J. (1994). Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolar, K. P. (2009). Motives Behind the Use of Social Networking Sites: An Empirical Study. ICFAI Journal of Management Research, 8(1), 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borle, S., Dholakia, U., Singh, S., & Durham, E. (2010). An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Facebook Fan Page Participation on Customer Behavior. Rice University, Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21(3), 241–263, doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dholakia, U. M., & Durham, E. (2010). One Café Chain’s Facebook Experiment. Harvard Business Review, 88(3), 26–26.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Donaldson, M. S. (2011). Promoting Luxury Goods in China through Social Media. MultiLingual (October/November), 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois, B., & Duquesne, P. (1993). The Market for Luxury Goods: Income versus Culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dubois, B., & Duquesne, P. (1993). Polarization Maps: A new Approach to Identifying and Assessing Competitive Position — The Case of Luxury Brands. Marketing and Research Today, 21(May), 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, B., Laurent, G., & Czellar, S. (2001). Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes. Consumer Research Working Paper. Jouy-en-Josas: HEC.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foster, M. K., Francescucci, A., & West, B. C. (2010). Why Users Participate in Online Social Networks. International Journal of e-Business Management, 4(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geerts, A., & Veg-Sala, N. (2011). Evidence on Internet Communication — Management Strategies for Luxury Brands. Global Journal of Business Research, 5(5), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grossman, G. M., & Shapiro, C. (1988). Foreign Counterfeiting of Status Goods. The Quaterly Journal of Economics, 103(1), 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hennig-Thurau, T., Malthouse, E. C., Friege, C., Gensler, S., Lobschat, L., Rangaswamy, A., et al. (2010). The Impact of New Media on Customer Relationships. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapferer, J.-N. (1997). Managing Luxury Brands. Journal of Brand Management, 4(4), 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kapferer, J.-N. (1998). Why are we seduced by Luxury Brands. Journal of Brand Management, 6(1), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz, E. (1959). Mass Communication Research and the Study of Culture. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kim, J. W., Choi, J., Qualls, W., & Kyesook, H. (2008). It Takes a Marketplace Community to Raise Brand Commitment: The Role of Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(3), 409–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kozinets, R. V., de Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. S. (2010). Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Langmack, F. (2006). Premiummarken — Begriffsbestimmung, Typologisierung und Implikationen für das Management. München: FGM Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  27. LaRose, R., Mastro, D., & Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding Internet Usage. Social Sciences Computer Review, 19(4), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2), 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for Sale. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Libai, B., Bolton, R., Bügel, M. S., de Ruyter, K., Götz, O., Risselada, H., et al. (2010). Customer-to-Customer Interactions: Broadening the Scope of Word of Mouth Research. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 267–282, doi:10.1177/1094670510375600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McAlexander, J., Schouten, J., & Koenig, H. (2002). Building Brand Community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muniz Jr, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand Community. [Article]. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nueno, J. L., & Quelch, J. A. (1998). The Mass Marketing of Luxury. Business Horizons, November-December, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Okonkwo, U. (2009). Sustaining the Luxury Brand on the Internet. Journal of Brand Management, 16(5/6), 302–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Oxford Latin Dictionary (1992). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Peluchette, J., & Karl, K. (2009). Examining Students’ Intended Image on Facebook: “What Were They Thinking?!”. The Journal of Education for Business, 85(1), 30–37, doi:10.1080/08832320903217606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Phan, M. (2011). Do Social Media Enhance Consumer’s Perception and Purchase Intentions of Luxury Brands? VIKALPA, 36(1), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Phau, I., & Prendergast, G. (2000). Consuming Luxury Brands: The Relevance of the “Rarity Principle”. Journal of Brand Management, 8(2), 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. B. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Exploring Friend-Networking Sites. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sekora, J. (1977). Luxury: The Concept in Western Thought — Eden to Smollet. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sheldon, P. (2008). The Relationship Between Unwillingness-to-Communicate and Students’ Facebook Use. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20(2), 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Truong, Y. (2010). Personal Aspirations and the Consumption of Luxury Goods. International Journal of Market Research, 52(5), 653–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tsai, S.-P. (2005). Impact of Personal Orientation on Luxury-Brand Purchase Value. International Journal of Market Research, 47(4), 429–454.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, Gossip, Facebook and Myspace. Info., Comm. & Soc., 11(4), 544–564, doi:10.1080/13691180801999050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tynan, C., McKechnie, S., & Chhuon, C. (2010). Co-Creating Value for Luxury Brands. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1156–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. van Doorn, J., Lemon, K., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., et al. (2010). Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). A Review and a Conceptual Framework of Prestige Seeking Consumer Behavior. Journal of the Academy of Market Science Review(1).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring Perceptions of Brand Luxury. Brand Management, 2(6), 484–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wernerfelt, B. (1990). Advertising Content — When Brand Choice is a Signal. Journal of Business, 63(1), 91–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Woisetschläger, D. M., Hartleb, V., & Blut, M. (2008). How to Make Brand Communities Work: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumer Participation. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 7(3), 237–256, doi:10.1080/15332660802409605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the Involvement Construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(3), 341–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Jahn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jahn, B., Kunz, W., Meyer, A. (2012). The Role of Social Media for Luxury Brands—Motives for Consumer Engagement and Opportunities for Business. In: Burmann, C., König, V., Meurer, J. (eds) Identitätsbasierte Luxusmarkenführung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4060-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4060-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-4059-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-4060-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics