Skip to main content

Market Shaping Orientation and Firm Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management

Abstract

Marketing theory suggests market orientation as an effective strategy for achieving and maintaining competitive advantage (Kohli/Jaworski 1990; Narver/Slater 1990). Reviewing the literature, Jaworski et al. (2000) criticize most conceptualizations of the construct to be too narrow and to neglect a proactive understanding of shaping customers and/or the market. Against this background, we discuss two approaches to being market oriented: the first can be described as a ‘market driven’ and the second as a ‘market shaping’ approach. We develop new measures for the latter construct and empirically test its antecedents and consequences. Moreover, we examine moderator variables affecting the market shaping orientation-performance linkage, using a sample of 181 firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Aiken, M./Hage, J. (1968): Organizational Interdependence and Intra-Organizational Structure, American Sociological Review, Vol. 33, 6, pp. 912–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, J. C./Gerbing, D. W. (1991): Predicting the Performance of Measures in a Confirmatory Factor Analysis with a Pretest Assessment of Their Substantive Validities, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 76, 5, pp. 732–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagozzi, R. P./Yi, Y. (1988): On Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, 2, pp. 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baron, R./Kenny, D. A. (1986): The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, 6, pp. 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carrillat, F. A./Jaramillo, F./Locander, W. B. (2004): Market-Driving Organizations: A Framework, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2004, 5, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chin, W. (1998): Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, 1, pp. 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carrillat, F. A./Marcolin, B. L./Newsted, P. N. (2003): A partial leastsquares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a monte carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study, Information Systems Research, Vol. 14, 2, pp. 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandy, R. K./Tellis, G. J. (1998): Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35, 4, pp. 474–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, T./Varadarajan, P. R./Pride, W. M. (1994): Environmental Management: The Construct and Research Propositions, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 29, 1, pp. 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Collins, J. C./Porras, J. I. (1991): Organizational Vision and Visionary Organizations, California Management Review, Vol. 34, 1, pp. 30–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Conger, J. A./Kanungo, R. N. (1994): Charismatic Leadership in Organizations: Perceived Behavioral Attributes and Their Measurement, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 15, 5, pp. 439–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Day, G. S. (1994): The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, 4, pp. 37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deshpande, R./Farley, J. U. (1998): Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis, Journal of Market-Focused Management, Vol. 2, 3, pp. 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deshpande, R./Farley, J. U./Webster, F. E. Jr. (1993): Corporate Culture, Customer. Orientation and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, 1, pp. 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diamantopoulos, A./Winklhofer, H. M. (2001): Index Construction With Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, 2, pp. 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrell, O. C./Skinner, S. J. (1988): Ethical Behaviour and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 25, 1, pp. 103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fornell, C./Bookstein, F. L. (1982): Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, 4, pp. 440–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fornell, C./Larcker, D. F. (1981): Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 1, pp. 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fornell, C./Cha, J. (1994): Partial Least Squares, in: Bagozzi, R. (ed.), Advanced Methods of Marketing Research, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hall, R. (1993): A Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, 8, pp. 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall, R./Haas, J. E./Johnson, N. J. (1967): Organizational Size, Complexity, and Formalization, American Sociological Review, Vol. 32, 6, pp. 903–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamel, G. (1996): Strategy as Revolution, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 74, 4, pp. 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hamel, C./Prahalad, C. K. (1991): Corporate Imagination and Expeditionary Marketing, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69, 4, pp. 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Harris, L. C./Cai, K. Y. (2003): Exploring Market shaping orientation: A Case Study of De Beers in China, Journal of Market-Focused Management, Vol. 5, 3, pp. 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hills, S. B./Sarin, S. (2003): From Market Driven to Market shaping orientation: An Alternative Paradigm for Marketing in High Technology Industries, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 11, 3, pp. 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Homburg, C./Pflesser, C. (2000): A Multiple-Layer Model of Market-Oriented Organizational Culture: Measurement Issues and Performance Outcomes, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37, 4, pp. 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hulland, J. (1999): Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of four recent studies, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, 2, pp. 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hurley, R. F./Hult, G. T. (1998): Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, 3, pp. 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hurt, T. H./Joseph, K./Cook, C. D. (1977): Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness, Human Communication Research, Vol. 4, 1, pp. 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaworski, B. J./Kohli, A. K. (1993): Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, 3, pp. 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaworski, B. J./Kohli, A. K./Sahay A. (2000): Market-driven versus driving-markets, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28, 1, pp. 45–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kirca, A. H./Jayachandran, S./Bearden, W. O. (2005): Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of Its Antecedents and Impact on Performance, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, 2, pp. 24–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kohli, A. K./Jaworski, B. J. (1990): Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, 2, pp. 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kumar, N. (1997): The Revolution in Retailing: from Market Driven to Market shaping orientation, Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, 6, pp. 830–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kumar, N./Scheer, L./Kotler, P. (2000): From Market Driven to Market shaping orientation, European Management Journal, Vol. 18, 2, pp. 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lado, A. A./Wilson, M. C. (1994): Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Competency-Based Perspective, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, 4, pp. 699–727.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lipton, M. (1996): Opinion: Demystifying the Development of an Organizational Vision, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 37, 4, pp. 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  38. MacKenzie, Scott B./Podsakoff, Phillip M./Rich, Gregory A. (2001): Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership and Salesperson Performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 29, 2, pp. 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Markides, C. C. (1999): A Dynamic View of Strategy, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40, 3, pp. 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Narver, J./Slater, S. (1990): The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, 4, pp. 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Meyer, J. P./Allen, N. J. (1991): A Three-Component Conceptualisation of Organizational Commitment, Human Resources Management Review, Vol. 1, 1, pp. 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mowday, R. T./Porter, L. W./Steers, R. M. (1982): Employee-Organizational Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nunnally, J. C. (1978): Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pierce, J./Delbecq, A. L. (1977): Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes, and Innovation, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 2, 1, pp. 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pil, F. K./Cohen, S. K. (2006): Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, 4, pp. 995–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Podsakoff, P. M./MacKenzie, S. B./Lee, J.-Y./Podsakoff, N. P. (2003): Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, 5, pp. 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Raju, P. S. (1980): Optimum Stimulation Level: Its Relationship to Personality, Demographics, and Exploratory Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, 3, pp. 272–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Blut, M., Holzmüller, H., Stolper, M. (2012). Market Shaping Orientation and Firm Performance. In: Diamantopoulos, A., Fritz, W., Hildebrandt, L. (eds) Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics