Advertisement

Simulator studies of drug-induced driving impairment

  • Anthony Liguori

Abstract

Driving simulators provide a safe means of identifying and comparing drug effects within a driver. While the scientific and societal benefits of driving simulators are numerous, the absence of a “standard” simulator has increased the difficulty of drawing conclusions across studies. This chapter compares the design of and results from driving simulators in substance abuse research from the past decade.

Simulators: The National Advanced Driving Simulator is an elevated enclosed dome that houses an entire vehicle with full instrumentation and a 360-degree perspective. Its realism is unparalleled, but it is typically not used for substance abuse research. The Advanced Mobile Operations Simulator (AMOS) is sensitive to alcohol effects, but provides no outcome measures other than brake latency. The AusED Driving Simulator features a task design similar to that of the AMOS, but at a lower speed and at a different simulated time of day. It is particularly sensitive to sleepiness. The University of Helsinki Driving Simulator resembles the AMOS task in its brevity and limited number of dependent measures, and is sensitive to sedative drug effects. The Cyber CAR LITE uses one large white screen rather than computer monitors. Highway and urban driving are simulated in day and night conditions. The STISIM Drive simulation allows for a longer, more realistic, and more interactive driving experience than the AMOS, and is sensitive to alcohol impairments.

Outcome measures: Deviation from lateral position and reaction time have been increased by benzodiazepines and alcohol. Vehicle Speed has been characterized as insensitive to drug effects.

Future directions: The standard measures of lane deviation, reaction time, and speed may be sufficient for identification of basic behavioral impairments. Yet other aspects of drug-related accidents — including manipulations of weather, time of day, traffic conditions, decision making, risk taking, divided attention, and sleep deprivation — deserve further study.

Keywords

Simulated Driving Lane Deviation Substance Abuse Research Accident Anal KDYH EHHQ 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    US Dept of Transportation (2006). Traffic safety facts 2005: alcohol. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones RK Shinar D, Walsh JM (2003) State of knowledge of drug-impaired driving. Final Report DOT HS 809 642. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuhl J, Evans D, Papelis Y, Romano R, Watson G (1995) The Iowa Driving Simulator: an immersive research environment. IEEE Computer 28: 35–41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weiler JM, Bloomfield JR, Woodworth GG, Grant AR, Layton TA, Brown TL, McKenzie DR, Baker TW, Watson GS (2000) Effects of fexofenadine, diphenhydramine, and alcohol on driving performance — A randomized, placebo-controlled trial in the Iowa Driving Simulator. Ann Intern Med 132: 354–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freeman J, Watson G, Papelis Y, Lin T, Tayyab A, Romano R, Kuhl J (1995) The Iowa Driving Simulator: An Implementation and Application Overview: SAE paper 950174 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liguori A, D’Agostino RB, Dworkin SI, Edwards D, Robinson JH (1999) Alcohol effects on mood, equilibrium, and simulated driving. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23: 815–821PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liguori A, Gatto CP, Jarrett DB (2002) Separate and combined effects of marijuana and alcohol on mood, equilibrium and simulated driving. Psychopharmacology 163: 399–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liguori A, Gatto CP, Jarrett DB, McCall WV, Brown TW (2003) Behavioral and subjective effects of marijuana following partial sleep deprivation. Drug Alcohol Depen 70: 233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liguori A, Gatto CP, Robinson JH (1998) Effects of marijuana on equilibrium, psychomotor performance, and simulated driving. Behav Pharmacol 9: 599–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liguori A, Robinson JH (2001) Caffeine antagonism of alcohol-induced driving impairment. Drug Alcohol Depen 63: 123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Banks S, Catcheside P, Lack L, Grunstein RR, McEvoy RD (2004) Low levels of alcohol impair driving simulator performance and reduce perception of crash risk in partially sleep deprived subjects. Sleep 27: 1063–1067PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Howard ME, Jackson ML, Kennedy GA, Swann P, Barnes M, Pierce RJ (2007) The interactive effects of extended wakefulness and low-dose alcohol on simulated driving and vigilance. Sleep 30: 1334–1340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vakulin A, Baulk SD, Catcheside PG, Anderson R, van den Heuvel CJ, Banks S, McEvoy RD (2007) Effects of moderate sleep deprivation and low-dose alcohol on driving simulator performance and perception in young men. Sleep 30: 1327–1333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Linnavuo M, Ylilaakkola P, Mattila MJ, Maki M, Seppala T (1987) A New Device to Measure Drug-Induced Changes on Reactive and Coordinative Skills of Human-Performance. Pharmacol Toxicol 61: 142–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vanakoski J, Seppala T, Stromberg C, Naveri L, Hammett J, Ford N (2001) Effects of ceronapril alone or in combination with alcohol on psychomotor performance in healthy volunteers: A placebo-controlled, crossover study. Curr Ther Res Clin E 62: 699–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vanakoski J, Mattila MJ, Seppala T (2000) Driving under light and dark conditions: effects of alcohol and diazepam in young and older subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 56: 453–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mattila MJ, Vanakoski J, Kalska H, Seppala T (1998) Effects of alcohol, zolpidem, and some other sedatives and hypnotics on human performance and memory. Pharmacol Biochem Be 59: 917–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Silber BY, Papafotiou K, Croft RJ, Ogden E, Swann P, Stough C (2005) The effects of dexamphetamine on simulated driving performance. Psychopharmacology 179: 536–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harrison ELR, Fillmore MT (2005) Are bad drivers more impaired by alcohol? Sober driving precision predicts impairment from alcohol in a simulated driving task. Accident Anal Prev 37: 882–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harrison ELR, Fillmore MT (2005) Social drinkers underestimate the additive impairing effects of alcohol and visual degradation on behavioral functioning. Psychopharmacology 177: 459–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harrison ELR, Fillmore MT (2006) Alcohol and the need for speed: An examination of multiple factors influencing risky driving behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 30: 156aGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harrison ELR, Marczinski CA, Fillmore MT (2007) Driver training conditions affect sensitivity to the impairing effects of alcohol on a simulated driving test to the impairing effects of alcohol on a simulated driving test. Exp Clin Psychopharm 15: 588–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leung S, Starmer G (2005) Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task. Accident Anal Prev 37: 1056–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Partinen M, Hirvonen K, Hublin C, Halavaara M, Hiltunen H (2003) Effects of after-midnight intake of zolpidem and temazepam on driving ability in women with non-organic insomnia. Sleep Med 4: 553–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rapoport MJ, Banina MC (2007) Impact of psychotropic medications on simulated driving — A critical review. CNS Drugs 21: 503–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Staner L, Ertle S, Boeijinga P, Rinaudo G, Arnal MA, Muzet A, Luthringer M (2005) Nextday residual effects of hypnotics in DSM-IV primary insomnia: a driving simulator study with simultaneous electroencephalogram monitoring. Psychopharmacology 181: 790–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Iudice A, Bonanni E, Maestri M, Nucciarone B, Brotini S, Manca L, Iudice G, Murri L (2002) Lormetazepam effects on daytime vigilance, psychomotor performance and simulated driving in young adult healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharm Th 40: 304–309Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Irving A, Jones W (1992) Methods for Testing Impairment of Driving Due to Drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 43: 61–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lenne MG, Dietze P, Rumbold GR, Redman JR, Triggs TJ (2003) The effects of the opioid pharmacotherapies methadone, LAAM and buprenorphine, alone and in combination with alcohol, on simulated driving. Drug Alcohol Depen 72: 271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rimm DC, Sininger RA, Faherty JD, Whitley MD, Perl MB (1982) A Balanced Placebo Investigation of the Effects of Alcohol Vs Alcohol Expectancy on Simulated Driving Behavior. Addict Behav 7: 27–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burian SE, Liguori A, Robinson JH (2002) Effects of alcohol on risk-taking during simulated driving. Hum Psychopharm Clin 17: 141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burian SE, Hensberry R, Liguori A (2003) Differential effects of alcohol and alcohol expectancy on risk-taking during simulated driving. Hum Psychopharm Clin 18: 175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tornros JEB, Bolling AK (2005) Mobile phone use — Effects of handheld and handsfree phones on driving performance. Accident Anal Prev 37: 902–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tornros J, Bolling A (2006) Mobile phone use — effects of conversation on mental workload and driving speed in rural and urban environments. Transport Res F-Traf 9: 298–306Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Iudice A, Bonanni E, Gelli A, Frittelli C, Iudice G, Cignoni F, Ghicopulos I, Murri L (2005) Effects of prolonged wakefulness combined with alcohol and hands-free cell phone divided attention tasks on simulated driving. Hum Psychopharm Clin 20: 125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Philip P, Sagaspe P, Taillard J, Valtat C, Moore N, Akerstedt T, Charles A, Bioulac B (2005) Fatigue, sleepiness, and performance in simulated versus real driving conditions. Sleep 28: 1511–1516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Otmani S, Pebayle T, Roge J, Muzet A (2005) Effect of driving duration and partial sleep deprivation on subsequent alertness and performance of car drivers. Physiol Behav 84: 715–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Arnedt JT, Owens J, Crouch M, Stahl J, Carskadon MA (2005) Neurobehavioral performance of residents after heavy night call vs after alcohol ingestion. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc 294: 1025–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brookhuis KA, de Waard D, Samyn N (2004) Effects of MDMA (ecstasy), and multiple drugs use on (simulated) driving performance and traffic safety. Psychopharmacology 173: 440–445PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Horne J, Reyner L (1999) Vehicle accidents related to sleep: a review. Occup Environ Med 56: 289–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag/Switzerland 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Liguori
    • 1
  1. 1.Wake Forest University School of MedicineMedical Center BoulevardWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations