Advertisement

A Multiobjective Optimisation Approach to Robot Kinematic Design

  • A. P. Pashkevich
  • D. E. Khmel
Conference paper
Part of the International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 361)

Abstract

Arising requirements to robot productivity and quality of work challenge to robot designers abilities. The proper performance of industrial robots can be achieved through the careful design of manipulators, drive systems and controllers. A number of performance measures have been proposed which provide a representation of selected aspects of manipulator performance. Since these each represent alternative facets of performance it is desirable to include several of them as objectives in optimisation problem and treat it as multiobjective one. So as the objectives will be competing with one another during the optimisation sequence, there is no unique solution to this problem. Rather, there is a set of solutions termed Pareto-optimal solutions that may be regarded as a trade-off surface from which designer selects a compromise solution.

Keywords

Link Length Joint Velocity Kinematic Design Goal Versus Robot Productivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Graettinger R.J., Krough B.M. “The Acceleration Radius: A Global Performance Measure for Robotic Manipulator”/IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol.4, no.1, February, 1988, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim J.O., Khosla P.K. “Dexterity Measures for Design and Control of Manipulators”/IEEE/IRS International Workshop Robots and Systems IROS’91, Nov., Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kobrinskij A.A., Kobrinskij A.E. “Manipulation system of Robots”, Nauka, 1985 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pashkevich A.P. “Estimation of Kinematic Properties of Manipulators”, Automation and Computers, no. 18, 1989 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paskevich A.P., Fleming P.J. “ A Multyobjective Optimisation Approach to Robotic Manipulator Design”/Proc. Int. Symp. on Computer-Aided Design of Control Systems, CADCS’91, UK, Swansea, 1991, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshikawa T. “Mobility and Redundancy Control of Robotic Mechanisms”/Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, 1985, pp. 1004–1009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waldron K. “Design of Arms” in “International Encyclopedia of Robotics”, R. Dorf and S.Nof, Editors, John Wiley and Sons, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang C.C. “The Optimal Design of Robot Drive System-Actuator Gains”/ Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation, 1987, pp. 816–821.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Pashkevich
    • 1
  • D. E. Khmel
    • 1
  1. 1.Minsk Radioengineering InstituteMinskRepublic of Belarussia

Personalised recommendations