Skip to main content

Methodological Problems of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences

  • Chapter
Disziplin und Kreativität

Part of the book series: Forschungen zur Soziologie und Sozialanthropologie ((FZSUS,volume 2))

Abstract

Modelling — which includes computer simulation — is a scientific activity which has the aim of creating a replication of some real system such that this replication will react to inputs in a manner that resembles the reaction of the real system to the same inputs. The first step in this modelling activity is thus the identification of some part of reality as a ‘real system’ consisting of elements, of relations defined on these elements, and of relations defined on the elements of the system and its environment (Bunge,1979). We believe that the properties of the system, of its elements, and of its environment will change due to some deterministic or stochastic laws, and we make our (mathematical or computer simulation) model follow the same laws which we believe will control that part of reality which is to be modelled. Thus the second step of any modelling activity will be the detection — or rather the reconstruction — of the laws governing that part of reality we are about to model. Kreutzer (1986,2) calls this step ‘system representation’. In a third step we shall try to combine our notions of the laws governing reality into a model which may be real by itself (as is the case in animal experiments used to detect primary and secondary effects of drugs), iconic, verbal, or formal, i.e. written down in a formal language like the language of mathematics or like a computer programming language. In each of the four cases we try to draw our inferences about model behaviour to be expected from the premises incorporated into the model. In the cases of the informal models — real, iconic, verbal — these inferences are weak because real, iconic, and verbal models abound in (‘natural’) properties of their own that are not shared by the part of reality to be modelled (the ‘abundancy class’ of Stachowiak (1973, 155 – 157), whereas in the case of formal models — mathematical and computer simulation — the inferences are just as certain as our assumptions about the laws governing reality are completely incorporated into our model. In most instances, of course, they are not completely incorporated, there are rather a lot of properties of the real system that we do not know or that we cannot measure or that we cannot or do not want to formalize (the ‘preterition class’ of Stachowiak).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alker, Hayward R., 1977: Computer-Simulationen: Unelegante Mathematik und noch schlechtere Sozialwissenschaft. In: Schmutzer, M.E.A. (Ed.): Mathematische Methoden in der Politikwissenschaft, München, pp. 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, David J., 1973: Stochastic Models for Social Processes. Chichester, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario, 1979: Treatise on Basic Philosophy, Vol. 4: Ontology II: A World of Systems. Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bungers, Dieter & Hermann Quinke, 1986: A Microsimulation Model for the German Federal Training Assistance Act–Principles, Problems and Experiences. In: Orcutt, Guy H., Joachim Merz & Hermann Quinke (Eds.): Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy, Amsterdam, pp. 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flache, Andreas & Vera Schmidt,1990: IPMOS. Interacting Populations: Modelling and Simulation. System zur Modellierung von Weidlich-Haag-Modellen, in diesem Sammelband

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, Jay W., 1968: Principles of Systems, Cambridge, 2nd preliminary edition 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galler, Heinz P. & Gert Wagner, 1986: The Microsimulation Model of the Sfb3 for the Analysis of Economic and Social Policies. In: Orcutt, Guy H., Joachim Merz & Hermann Quinke (Eds.): Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy, Amsterdam, pp. 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, Jack, 1986: Microanalytic Simulation Models for the Evaluation of Integrated Changes in Tax and Transfer Reform in Israel. In: Orcutt, Guy H., Joachim Merz and Hermann Quinke (Eds.): Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy, Amsterdam, pp. 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, Robert A., 1988: Computer-Assisted Theory Building. Modeling Dynamic Social Systems, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henize, John, 1984: Critical Issues in Evaluating Socio-Economic Models. In: Ören, Tuncer I., Bernhard P. Zeigler & Maurice S. Elzas (Eds.): Simulation and Model-Based Methodologies: An Integrative View, Berlin, pp. 557–590.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klösgen, Willy, 1986: Software Implementation of Microanalytic Simulation Models–State of the Art and Outlook. In: Orcutt, Guy H., Joachim Merz & Hermann Quinke (Eds.): Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy, Amsterdam, pp. 475–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzer, Wolfgang, 1986: System Simulation. Programming Styles and Languages, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietmeyer, Volker, 1986: Microanalytic Tax Simulation Models in Europe: Development and Experience in the German Federal Ministry of Finance. In: Orcutt, Guy H., Joachim Merz & Hermann Quinke (Eds.): Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy, Amsterdam, pp. 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Edward N., 1963: “Deterministic Nonperiodic Flow”. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 20 (1963), 130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, Donella H. et al., 1972: The Limits to Growth, New York: Universe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möhring Michael, 1990: MIMOSE. Eine funktionale Sprache zur Beschreibung und Simulation individuellen Verhaltens in interagierenden Populationen, in diesem Sammelband

    Google Scholar 

  • Orcutt, Guy H., 1986: Views on Microanalytic Simulation Modeling, In: Orcutt, Guy H., Joachim Merz and Hermann Quinke (Eds.): Microanalytic Simulation Models to Support Social and Financial Policy, Amsterdam, pp. 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, Anatol, 1984: Stochastic Model Building in the Social Sciences. In: Diekmann, Andreas & Peter Mitter (Eds.): Stochastic Modeling of Social Processes, Orlando, pp. 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sfb3 (Sonderforschungsbereich 3: Mikroanalytische Grundlagen der Gesellschaftspolitik) (Ed.): Handbuch zum Mikrosimulationsmodell des Sfb3, Frankfurt: Sfb3, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachowiak, Herbert, 1973: Allgemeine Modelltheorie, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troitzsch, Klaus G., 1989: Chaotisches Verhalten in einem Sozialsystem. Gegenüberstellung eines Makro-und eines Mikromodells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidlich, Wolfgangand & Günter Haag, 1983: Concepts and Models of a Quantitative Sociology. The Dynamics of Interacting Populations. Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, Eckart, 1981: Simulation und Analyse dynamischer Systeme in den Wirtschaftsund Sozialwissenschaften. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Leske + Budrich, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Troitzsch, K.G. (1991). Methodological Problems of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences. In: Kreutz, H., Bacher, J. (eds) Disziplin und Kreativität. Forschungen zur Soziologie und Sozialanthropologie, vol 2. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01311-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-01311-2_4

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-0911-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-01311-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics