Skip to main content

A Framework for Effectiveness of Institutional Policies on Technology-Enhanced Learning

  • Conference paper
Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology

Abstract

For institutional policies associated with technology-enhanced learning (TEL) instruments, such as blended learning, mobile learning, massive open online courses, and open educational resources, their policy effectiveness is to a large extent affected by how ‘effectiveness’ is conceptualized. Studies on effectiveness of institutional policies reveal that a diverse conceptualization has been employed.

This paper proposes a framework based on the instrumental perspective summarizing different approaches of assessing institutional policy effectiveness and the variables involved in each approach. A systematic literature survey of institutional policies on TEL is conducted, showing that the framework is highly comprehensive in terms of capturing different dimensions of policy effectiveness. This study will provide a point of reference not only on assessing the effectiveness of relevant polices but also for formulating relevant policies by educational administrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Singh, H.: Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology 43(6), 51–54 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kneill-Boxley, S.: Towards a mobile learning strategy to support Higher Educa-tion. Innovative Practice in Higher Education 1(2), 1–19 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan, L., Powell, S.: MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Cetis White Paper (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.): Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagerstrom, A., Ghinea, G.: Co-creation of value in higher education: Using social net-work marketing in the recruitment of students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35(1), 45–53 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeannette, K.J., Meyer, M.H.: Online learning equals traditional classroom training for master gardeners. HortTechnology 12(1), 148–156 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, D.S., Zhou, L., Briggs, R.O., Nunamaker Jr, J.F.: Instructional video in e-learning: assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management 43(1), 15–27 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mars, M.M., Ginter, M.B.: Connecting organizational environments with the instructional technology practices of community college faculty. Community College Review 34(4), 324–343 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiley, D.: On the Sustainability of Open Educational Resource Initiatives in Higher Education (2007), http://www1.oecd.org/edu/ceri/38645447.pdf (retrieved)

  10. Gruszczynska, A.: HEA/JISC Open Educational Resources Case Study: Pedagogical Development from OER Practice. Higher Education Academy, York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bennear, L.S., Stavins, R.N.: Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instru-ments. Environmental and Resource Economics 37, 111–129 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lascoumes, P., LeGales, P.: Introduction: Understanding public policy through its in-struments—from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20(1), 1–21 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Peters, B.G., van Nispen, F.K.M. (eds.): Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating the Tools of Public Administration. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price, L., Kirkwood, A.: Technology enhanced learning—where’s the evidence? In Curriculum, Technology & Transformation for an Unknown Future. In: Proceedings ASCILITE Sydney 2010, Sydney, Australia (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dean, P., Stahl, M., Sylwester, D., Peat, J.: Effectiveness of combined delivery modalities for distance learning and resident learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 2(3), 247–254 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Omollo, K.L., Rahman, A., Yebuah, C.A.: Producing OER from Scratch: The case of health sciences at the University of Ghana and the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice, Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vamosi, A.R., Pierce, B.G., Slotkin, M.H.: Distance learning in an accounting principles course – student satisfaction and perceptions of efficacy. Journal of Education for Business 79(6), 360–366 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li, L., Pitts, J.P.: Does it really matter? Using virtual office hours to enhance student–faculty interaction. Journal of Information Systems Education 20(1), 175–185 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E., Simonds, C.J.: The effects of teacher self-disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media and Technology 34(2), 175–183 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feliz, T., Ricoy, C., Feliz, S.: Analysis of the use of Twitter as a learning strategy in master’s studies. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e- Learning 28(3), 201–215 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harishankar, B.V.: Tracing the trajectory of OER in India: Reflections on three initiatives. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice, Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mendez, J.P., Le, K., De La Cruz, J.: Integrating Facebook in the classroom: Pedagogi-cal dilemmas. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies 13, 1–10 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Badarch, D., Knyazeva, S., Lane, A.: Introducing the opportunities and challenges of OER: The case of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Baltic States. In: Glen-nie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan, L., MacNeill, S., Kraan, W.: Open Educational Resources – Opportunities and Challenges for Higher Education (2008), http://muele.mak.ac.ug/file.php/1/Student_Reading_Resource/oer_briefing_paper.pdf (retrieved)

  25. Kanuka, H., Gauthier, G.: Pedagogical content knowledge in higher education and open educational resources: A case study on course design. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wolfenden, F.: OER production and adaptation through networking across Sub-Saharan Africa: Learning from TESSA. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Armstrong, J., Franklin, T.: A Review of Current and Developing International Practice in the Use of Social Networking (Web 2.0) in Higher Education (2008), http://www.franklin-consulting.co.uk/LinkedDocuments/the%20use%20of%20social%20networking%20in%20HE.pdf (retrieved)

  28. Al-Fahad, F.N.: Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the effectiveness of mobile learning in King Saud University, Saudi Arabia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 8(2), 111–119 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Phillips, J.A.: Experiences in finding and using OER in teacher education programmes: Pedagogical approach and challenges. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Olney, I., Lefoe, G.: Introducing mobile technologies: Preparatory staff development issues. In: ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning, Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mawoyo, M., Butcher, N.: Sharing existing teaching materials as OER: Key considera-tions from practice. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. van Wyk, T.: Taking OER beyond the OER community: Policy issues and priorities. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Misra, P.K.: Pedagogical quality enrichment in OER based courseware: Guiding principles. Open Praxis 5(2), 123–134 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Voss, B.D.: Massive open online courses (MOOCs): A primer for university and college board members. In: An AGB White Paper. Association of Governing Boards, Washington, D.C (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  35. White, D., Manton, M.: Open Educational Resources: The Value of Reuse in Higher Education. JISC funded OER Impact Study, University of Oxford (2011), http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/oer/OERTheValueOfReuseInHigherEducation.pdf (retrieved)

  36. Miligan, C., Littlejohn, A., Margaryan, A.: Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching 9(2), 149–159 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Afnan-Manns, S., Medrano, R., Mickelsen, K.F.: OneClick Digital and the Medrano Project: OER as Content, OER as Pedagogy (2013), http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/oneclick-digital-and-medrano-project-oer-content-oer-pedagogy

  38. Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Middleton-Detzner, C., Howell, H.: OER as a model for enhanced teaching and learning. In: Open ED 2010 Proceedings. UOC, OU, BYU, Barcelona (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chen, Y.: Investigating MOOCs through blog mining. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 15(2), 85–106 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. McClure, M.W.: MOOCs: Hope and hype in viral technologies and policies. Excellence in Higher Education 4, 7–24 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ezer, J.F.: The Interplay of Institutional Forces behind Higher ICT Education in India. Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Corbeil, J.R., Valdés-Corbeil, M.E.: Are you ready for mobile learning? EDUCAUSE Quarterly 30(2), 51–58 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Beddall-Hill, N.L., Raper, J.: Mobile devices as ‘Boundary Objects’ on field trips. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology 6(1), 28–46 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wallace, L., Young, J.: Implementing blended learning: Policy implications for universi-ties. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 13(8) (2010), http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter134/wallace_young134.html (retrieved)

  45. Cross, S.: Evaluation of the OLDS MOOC Curriculum Design Course: Participant Perspec-tives, Expectations and Experiences. OLDS MOOC Project, Milton Keynes (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lane, A.: Design and development of OER: A student perspective. In: Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., van Wyk, T. (eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice. Common-wealth of Learning, Vancouver (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wong, B.YY., Wong, B.TM., Pang, S. (2015). A Framework for Effectiveness of Institutional Policies on Technology-Enhanced Learning. In: Li, K.C., Wong, TL., Cheung, S.K.S., Lam, J., Ng, K.K. (eds) Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 494. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46158-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46158-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46157-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46158-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics