Advertisement

Modelling Technique for Knowledge Management, Process Management and Method Application - a Formula Student Exploratory Study

  • A. Albers
  • N. Reiss
  • N. Bursac
  • L. Schwarz
  • R. Lüdcke
Conference paper

Abstract

Due to increasing product complexity, an exchange of knowledge between different areas is getting more important in multidisciplinary product development. Furthermore, another trend can be recognized, which points out that employees change their position more often in an organization. Both trends, multidisciplinarity and a higher fluctuation lead to the consequence that it is necessary to explicate and share knowledge. Therefore, knowledge management should take up a central role in the product development processes (PDPs). Thus, a PDP has to be considered as a socio-technical system, which is characterized not only by technical development, but also is represented as knowledge-intensive process.

Keywords

Modelling Technique Knowledge Management Knowledge Flow Knowledge Object Product Development Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abels, S., Haak, L., Hahn, A. (2005) “Towards Semantic Model Integration for Knowledge Management Systems.” In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference Professional Knowledge Management - Experiences and Visions. Proceedings der GI, Kaiserslautern, Althoff, K. D. Dengel, A., Bergmann, R.; Nick, M.; Roth-Berghofer, T. Google Scholar
  2. Albers, A. (2010) “Five Hypotheses about Engineering Processes and their Consequences”, In: Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering TMCE 2010, Ancona, Italien Google Scholar
  3. Albers, A., Braun, A. (2011) “A generalised framework to compass and to support complex product engineering processes”. In: International Journal of Product Development 15 (1/2/3), pp. 6–25 Google Scholar
  4. Braun, A., Ebel, B., Albers, A. (2013) “Activity-Based Modeling and Analysis of Product Engineering Processes”. In: Smart Product Engineering: Proceedings of the 23rd CIRP Design Conference, ed. by Abramovici, M., Stark, R. Google Scholar
  5. Conrad, J. (2010) Semantische Netze zur Erfassung und Verarbeitung von Informationen und Wissen in der Produktentwicklung, Dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes Horváth, P., Möller, K. (2004) Intangibles in der Unternehmenssteuerung. Vahlen Verlag,MünchenGoogle Scholar
  6. Jänsch, J. (2007) Akzeptanz und Anwendung von Konstruktionsmethoden im industriellen Einsatz. Analyse und Empfehlungen aus kognitionswissenschaftlicher SichtGoogle Scholar
  7. Klein, G. (2001) Wissensgesellschaft - Ein Schlagwort aus ungewöhnlicher Perspektive beleuchtet. In: Graf, H.G. (Hrsg.): Und in Zukunft die Wissensgesellschaft. Der Umgang mit Wissen im Entscheidungsprozess. Verlag Rüegger, Zürich, pp. 81-88Google Scholar
  8. Meboldt, M. (2008). Mentale und formale Modellbildung in der Produktentstehung-als Beitrag zum integrierten Produktenstehung-Modell (iPeM). Forschungsberichte / IPEK, 29. IPEK Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe, Institut für Produktentwicklung, KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  9. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-Creating Company - How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. North, K., Güldenberg, S. (2008) Produktive Wissensarbeit(er): Antworten auf die Management-Herausforderung des 21. Jahrhunderts. Gabler Verlag, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  11. Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension, New York: Doubleday Reyes-Perez, M., Gausemeier, J., Nordsiek D. (2009) Ontology Development for a Manufacturing Data Base for Products with Graded Properties. In: International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management, pp. 105-109 Google Scholar
  12. Remus, U. (2002) „Prozeßorientiertes Wissensmanagement - Konzepte und Modellierung“ Universität Regensburg, DissertationGoogle Scholar
  13. Ropohl, G. (1975) „Einleitung in die Systemtechnik“, In Systemtechnik – Grundlagen und Anwendung, München Wien, Carl Hanser Verlag, pp. 1–77Google Scholar
  14. Tomiyama, P., Gu, Y., Jin, D., Lutters, C., Kimura, F. (2009) Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1993) “VDI-Richtlinie 2221, Systematic approach to the development and design of technical systems and products”, VDI-Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  15. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (2004) „VDI-Richtlinie 2206, Design methodology for mechatronic systems“, VDI-Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  16. Weiß, S. (2006) Konzept und Umsetzung eines Navigators für Wissen in der Produktentwicklung. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI. 386.Google Scholar
  17. WIIG, K. (2008) Knowledge Management for the Competent Enterprise. Business Intelligence Vol. 8, No. 10. Cutter ConsortiumGoogle Scholar
  18. Willke, H. (1998) Systemisches Wissensmanagement. Lucius & Lucius, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  19. Wynn, D. C., Clarkson, P. J. (2005) Models of designing, In: Design process improvement – A Review of Current Practice. Clarkson P. J., Eckert C. M. (Eds.), Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Wynn, D. C. (2010) “How Can PD Process Modelling Be Made More Useful? An Exploration of Factors Which Influence Modelling Utility” In: International Design Conference DESIGN 2010, Dubrovnik Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Albers
    • 1
  • N. Reiss
    • 1
  • N. Bursac
    • 1
  • L. Schwarz
    • 1
  • R. Lüdcke
    • 1
  1. 1.Karlsruher Institut für TechnologieKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations