Skip to main content

Communication and Knowledge Flows in Transnational R&D Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World

Abstract

Multinational companies exist in part because of their ability to tap into worldwide centers of expertise and disseminate this knowhow within the global firms. However, sharing knowledge efficiently is difficult even in highly networked organizations. Knowledge flows are hindered by spatial distance, costs of set-up and maintenance of communication structures, and lack of trust between distant sites. This chapter focuses on three key dimensions of virtual organizations: 1) knowledge transfer, 2) communication quality, and 3) coordination, and analyzes them in transnational R&D projects in industrial companies. Based on a cross-case comparison along the three dimensions, this chapter proposes inter-, intra- and multilocal aspects of virtual R&D teams, suggests three propositions, and concludes with managerial implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albers, S.; Eggers (1991): Organisatorische Gestaltungen von Produktinnovations-Prozessen. Führt der Wechsel des Organisationsgrades zu Innovationserfolg? Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 43(1): 44-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. J. (1977): Managing the Flow of Technology - Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1997). Making teamwork work: Boundary management in product development teams. Managing strategic innovation and change: A collection of readings. 433-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgulya, P. 2008. Hoffmann-La Roche: Global Differentiation between Research and Development. In Boutellier, R.; Gassmann, O.; von Zedtwitz, M. (eds): Managing Global Innovation - Uncovering the Secrets of Future Competitiveness. 3rd edition. Springer: Heidelberg. 307-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutellier, R.; Gassmann, O., Macho, H., Roux, M. 1998. Management of dispersed product development teams: the role of information technologies. R&D Management 28, 1, 13-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breu, K.; Hemingway, C.J. 2004. Making organisations virtual: the hidden cost of distributed teams. Journal of Information Technology 19, 191–202.Lipnack, J., Stamps, J. (1997): Virtual Teams—Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology. Wiley: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, R.A. 1984. Managing the Internal Corporate Venturing Process. Sloan Management Review 25, 2, 33-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campagna, M.; Roeder T. 2008. ABB: Management of Technology: Think Global, Act Local. In Boutellier, R.; Gassmann, O.; von Zedtwitz, M. (eds): Managing Global Innovation - Uncovering the Secrets of Future Competitiveness. 3rd edition. Springer: Heidelberg. 559-571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, V.; Manzini, R. (1997): Managing virtual R&D organisations: lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. International Journal of Technology Management, 13(5/6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G.; Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1991): New Product Processes at Leading Industrial Firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 20: 137-147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. M. (1992). The hidden costs of accelerated product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 188-199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meyer, A.; Mizushima, A. (1989): Global R&D Management. R&D Management, 19(2): 135-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meyer, A. (1991): Tech Talk: How Managers Are Stimulating Global R&D Communication. Sloan Management Review, 32(3): 49-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimanescu, D.; Dwenger, K. (1996): World-Class New Product Development. New York: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eirma (1995): Globalisation of R&D. EIRMA Conference Papers XLIV. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O.; von Zedtwitz, M. (2003a): Trends and Determinants of Managing Virtual R&D Teams. R&D Management 33, 3, 243-262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O.; von Zedtwitz, M. (2003b): Innovation Processes in Transnational Corporations. In: Shavinina, L. (Editor): The International Handbook on Innovation. Pergamon: Oxford, Part IX, Chpt. 4, 702-714

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, T.L.; Sawyer, J.E.; Neale, M.A. 2003. Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 27, 2, 265-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M.; Clark, K. B. (1990): Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl, M.; Ernst, H.; Proserpio, L. 2004. How Teamwork Matters More as Team Member Dispersion Increases. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24, 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. (1995): Going Global: the Use of ICT Networks in Research and Development. Research Policy, 24: 169-184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M. 1998. Technology integration: making critical choices in a dynamic world. Harvard Business School Press: Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, K. I., Nonaka, I., & Fakeuchi, H. (1985). Managing the new product development. The Uneasy Alliance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz. R.; Allen, T. 1985. Project performance and the locus of influence in the R&D matrix. Academy of Management Journal 28, 1, 67-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J. R.; Smith, D. K. (1993): The Wisdom of Teams. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, A.; Brown, K.; Sims, H.; Smith, K. (1995): The virtual team: A case study and inductive model. In: Beyerlein, M.; Johnson, D.; Beyerlein, S. (Eds): Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams. Vol 2. JAI Press: Greenwich. 229-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leavitt; H.J.; Lipman-Blumen, J. 1995. Hot Groups. Harvard Business Review 73 (4), 109-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipnack, J.; Stamps, J. 1997. Virtual teams reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madauss, B.J. 1994. Handbuch Projektmanagement. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznevski, M. Chudoba, K. (2000): Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness. Organization Science 11, 5, 473-492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muethel, M.; Siebdrat, F.; Hoegl, M. 2012. When do we really need interpersonal trust in globally dispersed new product development teams? R&D Management 42, 1, 31-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D.; Tushman, M. 1990. Beyond the Charismatic Leader: Leadership and Organizational Change. California Management Review 32, 2, 77-97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naman, J., Dahlin, K.; Krohn, M. Editors, 1998). Managing international R&D for global platforms and local adaptations. Working Paper 98-1, The Carnegie Bosch Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H. (1995): The Knowledge-Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (1994): Implementing a Stage-Gate Process: A Multi-Company Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11: 183-200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD 2018. Multinational enterprises in the global economy. OECD Policy Note May 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara-Devereaux, M.; Johansen, R. (1994): Globalwork. Bridging Distance, Culture, and Time. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perea, C.; von Zedtwitz, M. (2018). Organic vs. Mechanistic Coordination in Distributed New Product Development (NPD) Teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 49, 4-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reger, G. 1999. How R&D is coordinated in Japanese and European multinationals. R&D Management 29, 1, 71-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussel, P. A.; Saad, K. N.; Erickson, T. J. (1991): Third Generation R&D: Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy. Boston (MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, A. H. (1989): Managing Technology in the Decentralized Firm. New York, Toronto, Singapore: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szakonyi, R. (1994). Measuring R&D Effectiveness. Research Technology Management 37, 2, 27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedmon, C. (1997): Integrated Management of a Global Corporate R&D Programme, in: EIRMA (1997): The Evolution of Industrial R&D. Vol. XLVII, Paris, 79-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thamhain, H.; Wilemon, D. 1987. Building high performing engineering project teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 34, 3, 130-137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L. (1979): Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 82-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD 2011. World Investment Report. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke, J.; Lippe, S. 2015. Managing collaborative research projects: A synthesis of project management literature and directives for future research. International Journal of Project Management 33, 5, 1022-1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelwright, S. C.; Clark, K. B. (1992): Revolutionizing Product Development - Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, A.; Edgar, M. 2008. Unisys: Localization of Software Development. In Boutellier, R.; Gassmann, O.; von Zedtwitz, M. (eds): Managing Global Innovation - Uncovering the Secrets of Future Competitiveness. 3rd edition. Springer: Heidelberg. 487-506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyleczuk, R. 1999. Hewlett-Packard: Planet-Wide Patterns in the Company’s Technology Tapestry. In Boutellier, R.; Gassmann, O.; von Zedtwitz, M. (eds): Managing Global Innovation - Uncovering the Secrets of Future Competitiveness. 3rd edition. Springer: Heidelberg. 397-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Ven, A. 1986. Central Problems in the Management of Innovation. Management Science 32, 5, 590-607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Zedtwitz, M.; Gassmann, O. (2002): Market versus Technology Drive in R&D Internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31, 4, 569-58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Joachim von Zedtwitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

von Zedtwitz, M.J. (2020). Communication and Knowledge Flows in Transnational R&D Projects. In: Tiwari, R., Buse, S. (eds) Managing Innovation in a Global and Digital World. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27241-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics