Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Diversity Kompetenz trainieren

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

  • 27k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Buchkapitel vermittelt einen Überblick über die aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Befunde zur Wirksamkeit von Diversity Trainings. Es zeigt auf, dass diese Trainings - trotz ihrer sehr unterschiedlichen Ausgestaltung in der Praxis - im Prinzip wirksam sind. Das heißt, Diversity Trainings können Wissen und Fähigkeiten über den Inhalt und das Ziel von Diversity Strategien effizient vermitteln, Einstellungen gegenüber Diversity verbessern sowie auch positive Verhaltensänderungen im Umgang mit Personen aus diversen sozialen Gruppen herbeiführen. Dieses Buchkapitel zeigt aber auch auf, dass die Wirksamkeit von Diversity Trainings stark von einer Reihe weiterer Faktoren abhängt (z. B. Fokus des Trainings oder Teilnahmebedingungen) sowie auch paradoxe und unerwünschte „Nebenwirkungen“ haben können. Werden solche Aspekte berücksichtigt, sind Diversity Trainings eine sinnvolle und wirksame Maßnahme zur Umsetzung einer übergreifenden Diversity Management Strategie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Avery, D. R., & Thomas, K. M. (2004). Blending content and contact: The roles of diversity curriculum and campus heterogeneity in fostering diversity management competency. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 380–396. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2004.15112544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A., Barr, O., & Bunting, B. (2001). Police attitudes toward people with intellectual disability: An evaluation of awareness training. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 344–350. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2001.00339.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bezrukova, K., Jehn, K. A., & Spell, C. S. (2012). Reviewing diversity training: Where we have been and where we should go. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 207–227. doi:10.5465/amle.2008.0090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, P., & Jones, J. (2008). The diversity training handbook: A practical guide to understanding and changing attitudes. London: Kogan Page Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J. (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 755–780. doi:10.1002/job.268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanover, J., & Cellar, D. (1998). Environmental factors and the effectiveness of workforce diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9, 105–124. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920090203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays-Thomas, R. (2004). Why now? The contemporary focus on managing diversity. The Psychology and Management of Workplace Diversity, 13, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer, K., & Engel, E. (2006). Diversity management bei der Deutschen Bahn AG – Ein Beitrag zur Kundenzufriedenheit. In M. Becker & A. Seidel (Hrsg.), Diversity management – Unternehmens- und Personalpolitik der Vielfalt (S. 363–380). Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, C. R., Major, B., Jurcevic, I., Dover, T. L., Brady, L. M., & Shapiro, J. R. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 504–519. doi:10.1037/a0030838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617. doi:10.1177/000312240607100404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinoski, Z. T., Steele-Johnson, D., Peyton, E. J., Leas, K. A., Steinke, J., & Bowling, N. A. (2013). A meta-analytic evaluation of diversity training outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1076–1104. doi:10.1002/Job.1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D. M. (2006). Can diversity training discriminate? Backlash to lesbian, gay, and bisexual diversity initiatives. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18, 61–72. doi:10.1007/s10672-005-9005-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, D. L., Lankau, M. J., Chrobot-Mason, D., Mollica, K. A., & Friedman, R. A. (2004). Backlash toward diversity initiatives: Examining the impact of diversity program justification, personal, and group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 77–102. doi:10.1108/eb022908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. B., Dawson, J. F., Kravitz, D. A., & Gulick, L. (2012). A multilevel study of the relationships between diversity training, ethnic discrimination and satisfaction in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 5–20. doi:10.1002/job.728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311–328. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krings, F., Tschan, F., & Bettex, S. (2007). Determinants of attitudes toward affirmative action in a Swiss sample. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 585–611. doi:10.1007/s10869-007-9042-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krings, F., Bollmann, G., & Palazzo, B. (2009). Diversity „spielerisch“ trainieren: Auswirkungen auf Einstellungen und Sensibilität gegenüber Diversity bei Führungskräften. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 53, 33–38. doi:10.1026/0932-4089.53.1.33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., & Roberson, L. (2008a). Common goals and golden opportunities: Evaluations of diversity education in academic and organizational settings. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7(3), 309–331. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2008.34251670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., & Roberson, L. (2008b). Diversity initiative effectiveness: What organizations can (and cannot) expect from diversity recruitment, diversity training, and formal mentoring programs. In A. P. Brief (Hrsg.), Diversity at work (S. 265–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paluck, E. L. (2006). Diversity training and intergroup contact: A call to action research. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 577–595. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00474.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, P. J. (2010). Assessing intercultural effectiveness outcomes in a year-long study abroad program. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 70–80. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendry, L. F., Driscoll, D. M., & Field, S. C. T. (2007). Diversity training: Putting theory into practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 27–50. doi:10.1348/096317906x118397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Schmidtke, J. (1998). Individual differences in the effectiveness of sexual harassment awareness training. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 698–723. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01727.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. L., & Medkik, N. (2004). The effects of diversity awareness training on differential treatment. Group and Organization Management, 29, 517–536. doi:10.1177/1059601103257426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, N. J., & Stewart, R. E. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215–223. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00138.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (1996). Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Lausanne, Lausanne, Schweiz

    Franciska Krings & Michèle C. Kaufmann

Authors
  1. Franciska Krings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michèle C. Kaufmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franciska Krings .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany

    Petia Genkova

  2. Hochschule Merseburg, Merseburg, Germany

    Tobias Ringeisen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krings, F., Kaufmann, M.C. (2016). Diversity Kompetenz trainieren. In: Genkova, P., Ringeisen, T. (eds) Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08594-0_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08594-0_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08593-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08594-0

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation