Zusammenfassung
Die Produktionsvision „Industrie 4.0“ umfasst eine Vielzahl von technologisch und organisatorisch geprägten Veränderungen, welche sich unter den Schlagworten „Individualisierung“ und „Dynamisierung“ subsummieren lassen. Zwei wesentliche Konzeptelemente und Umsetzungsbereiche stellen dabei „Dynamic Production Scheduling“ (DPS) und „Cyber-Physical-Systems“ (CPS) dar. Produktionstheoretisch wird in diesem Kapitel der Transfer in Richtung der Dienstleistungsproduktion mit einer Konzeptanalyse am Beispiel universitärer Leistungsprozesse ausgeführt.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Amaldas, C., Shankaranarayanan, A., & Gemba, K. (2013). An empirical analysis of faculty performance and perspectives in Japanese business schools. International Journal of Management & Information Technology, 4(1), 179–189.
Chen, T., (1997). A measurement of the resource utilization efficiency of university libraries. International Journal of Production Economics, 53(1), 71–80.
Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1995). Departmental productivity in American universities: Economies of scale and scope. Economics of Education Review, 14, 199–244.
Frazzon, E. M., Hartmann, J., Makuschewitz, T., & Scholz-Reiter, B. (2013). Towards socio-cyber-physical systems in production networks. Forty sixth CIRP conference on manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP, 7, 49–54.
Jiang, H., & Barnhart, C. (2013). Robust airline schedule design in a dynamic scheduling environment. Computers & Operations Research, 40, 831–840.
Johnes, J. (2006). Measuring efficiency: A comparison of multilevel modelling and data envelopment analysis in the context of higher education. Bulletin of Economic Research, 58(2), 75–104.
Korhonen, S., Tainio, R., & Wallenius, J. (2001). Value efficiency analysis of academic research. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 121–132.
Malhotra, M. K., & Kher, H. V. (1996). Institutional research productivity in production and operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 14(1), 55–77.
Mikusz, M. (2014). Towards an understanding of cyber-physical systems as industrial software-product-service systems. Product Services Systems and Value Creation – Proceedings of the 6th CIRP Conference on Industrial Product-Service Systems. Procedia CIRP, 16, 385–389.
Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2010). Using data envelopment analysis to assess effectiveness of the processes at the university with performance indicators of quality. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 16(1), 87–103.
Riedl, M., Zipper, H., Meier, M., & Diedrich, C. (2014). Cyber-physical systems alter automation architectures. Annual Reviews in Control, 38, 123–133.
Sellers-Rubio, R., Mas-Ruiz, F. J., & Casado-Diaz, A. B. (2010). University efficiency: Complementariness versus trade-off between teaching, research and administrative activities. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(4), 373–391.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klumpp, M. (2016). Industrie 4.0 in der Dienstleistungsproduktion – eine Konzeptanalyse am Beispiel universitärer Leistungsprozesse in Forschung und Lehre. In: Obermaier, R. (eds) Industrie 4.0 als unternehmerische Gestaltungsaufgabe. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08165-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-08165-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-08164-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-08165-2
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)