Skip to main content

Abstract

In this paper, I consider the concept of inequality. I begin with the ambiguity of this concept as customarily deployed in American sociology, arguing that when we say “inequality,” we usually mean “injustice.” I then outline some problems in sociological thinking about injustice, first considering measurement issues, then ontological ones. Since the social theories of the Enlightenment prove to be too limited for the second of these discussions, I invoke a processual social ontology that emphasizes certain particular problematics for sociological concepts of injustice. In conclusion, I present a simple American example that effectively captures these problematics, offering that example as a puzzle for further reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). Transcending General Linear Reality.Sociological Theory 6, 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, A. (2005). The Idea of Outcome. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.),The Politics of Method in the Human Sciences (Pp. 393-426) Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976).The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, C. (2015).Boom, Bust, Exodus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosieres, A. (1998).The Politics of Large Numbers. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubet, F. (2010).Les Places et les Chances. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, L. (1970).Homo Hierarchicus. London: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D. (1984).Notes on Social Measurement. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1950).Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Abbott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abbott, A. (2016). Inequality and process. In: Makrinus, L., Otremba, K., Rennert, C., Stoeck, J. (eds) (De)Standardisierung von Bildungsverläufen und -strukturen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07766-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07766-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07765-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07766-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics