Abstract
From invention to innovation – the distinction of the two concepts is critical if firms are to successfully introduce new products into the market. Invention, that is, a new solution to a problem – be it a technical concept, an outline of a manufacturing process, or a service concept – only transforms into an innovation if it takes the form of a product for which the market is willing to pay. The innovation process is a structured approach that links invention and innovation and helps developing early stage ideas and concepts (i.e., inventions) to marketable products, processes, or services. Today, the innovation process is a constituting part of every successful company. With respect to the St. Gallen Business Innovation framework, the innovation process is the vehicle by which products and services as well as entire processes and business models can be systematically innovated.
In this chapter, the focus is on the early phase of the innovation process where new product ideas are generated – the very first phase in the innovation process of the St. Gallen Business Innovation framework. This phase is coined by individual and collective creativity as vital preconditions for new ideas and, therefore, for any physical product development activities. First, the innovation process in a wider sense is described with a focus on its early phase. The chapter continues by focusing on the specific use of analogical thinking in the early phase to spark creativity and increase the number of highly novel product ideas. Finally, based on four cases where analogical thinking across industry boundaries has led to successful product innovations, we describe the Cross-Industry Innovation (CII) process that entails the use of analogical thinking within the wider frame of the innovation process. The chapter concludes by providing guidelines to management practice regarding critical success factors in the CII process.
This chapter is based on an earlier article that has been published by the authors in Creativity & Innovation Management (2008). It has been renewed and extended to include specific aspects of the innovation process in general.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For reasons of simplicity we refer to “product” as an umbrella term that includes product, process, and service solutions.
References
Brockhoff K (1994) Forschung und Entwicklung. Planung und Kontrolle. Oldenbourg, München
Cooper R (1990) Stage-gate systems: a new tool for managing new products. Bus Horizons 33(3):44–54
Cooper R (1994) Third-generation new product processes. J Product Innovation Manag 11(1):3–14
Dahl DW, Moreau P (2002) The influence and value of analogical thinking during new product ideation. J Marketing Res 39(1):47
De Bono E (2000) Six Thinking Hats. Penguin Books, London
Gagne CL, Shoben EJ (1997) Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. J Experimental Psychol: Learning, Memory and Cognition 23(1):71
Gassmann O, Zeschky M, Wolff T, Stahl M (2010) Crossing the industry-line: breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with ‘non-suppliers’. Long Range Planning 43(5–6):639–654
Gavetti G, Rivkin JW (2005) How strategists really think. Harvard Business Rev 83:152
Gentner D, Rattermann MJ (1993) The roles of similarity in transfer: separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychol 25(4):524
Hampton JA (1998) Conceptual combination: Conjunction and negation of natural concepts. Memory & Cognition 25(6):888
Hargadon A, Sutton RI (1997) Technology Brokering and Innovation in a Product Development Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(4):716–749
Herstatt C, Kalogerakis K (2005) How to use analogies for breakthrough innovations. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2(3):331–347
Holyoak KJ, Thagard P (1995) Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
Khurana A, Rosenthal S (1997) Integrating the Fuzzy Front End of New Product Development. Sloan Management Review 38(2):103–105
Kim J, Wilemon D (2002) Focusing the fuzzy front end in new product development. R&D Manag 32(4):269–279
Reid S, de Bretani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J Product Innovation Manag 21(3):170–184
Ross BH (1989) Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. J Experimental Psychol: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15(3):456
Ward TB (2004) Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. J Bus Venturing 19(2):173
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zeschky, M., Gassmann, O. (2016). The Innovation Process: Sparking Creativity by Cross-Industry Analogies. In: Hoffmann, C., Lennerts, S., Schmitz, C., Stölzle, W., Uebernickel, F. (eds) Business Innovation: Das St. Galler Modell. Business Innovation Universität St. Gallen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07167-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-07167-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-07166-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-07167-7
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)