Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kultur der Kontrolle. Verbrechensbekämpfung und soziale Ordnung in der Gegenwart

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Kriminologische Grundlagentexte

Zusammenfassung

David Garland (* 1955) gilt als einer der bedeutendsten Kriminalsoziologen der Gegenwart, dessen Analyse einen grundlegenden Wandel der westlichen Kontrollkultur zu einer Renaissance des Strafens (penal segregation) einerseits und der unter Aktivierung ziviler Akteure angestrebten Prävention (preventive partnership) andererseits aufzeigt. Kennzeichnend für diesen Prozess sind nach Garland die zwölf Indikatoren, die hier abgedruckt sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur:

  • Beckett, Katherine (2001): Crime and Control in the Culture of Late Modernity, Review Essay, in: Law & Society Review 35: 899–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1976): Überwachen und Strafen, Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, David (1985): The Criminal and his Science, in: British Journal of Criminology 25: 109–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, David (1996): The Limits of the Sovereign State, in: British Journal of Criminology 36: 445–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, David (2003): Die Kultur der „High Crime Societies“. Voraussetzungen einer neuen Politik von „Law and Order“, in: Oberwittler, Dietrich/Karstedt, Susanne (Hg.), Soziologie der Kriminalität, Sonderheft 43 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Opladen: 6–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Henner/Paul, Bettina/Ostermeier, Lars (2007; Hg.): Kontrollkulturen. Texte zur Kriminalpolitik im Anschluss an David Garland, 9. Beiheft zum Kriminologischen Journal, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klimke, Daniela/ Sack, Fritz/ Schlepper, Christine (2013): Wie der punitive turn an den deutschen Grenzen Halt machen soll, in: Klimke, Daniela/ Legnaro, Aldo (Hg.), Politische Ökonomie und Sicherheit, Weinheim/Basel: 94–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautmann, Rüdiger/ Klimke, Daniela/ Sack, Fritz (2004): Punitivität, 8. Beiheft des Kriminologischen Journals, Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelnstein, Tobias/ Stolle, Peer (2011): Die Sicherheitsgesellschaft, 3. vollst. überarb. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotha, Trutz v. (2010): Die präventive Sicherheitsordnung: Weitere Skizzen über die Konturen einer ‚Ordnungsform der Gewalt‘, in: Kriminologisches Journal 42: 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Allen, F. A., The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, A., Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 2nd edn (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K., ‚Chain Gangs‘, Unpublished paper, 1998 (on file with the author).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. J., Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 1999: Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin (Washington DC: US Department of Justice, April 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. J., DiIulio, J. J., Walters, J. P., Body Count (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Book, A. S., ‚Shame on You: An Analysis of Modern „Shame Punishment as an Alternative to Incarceration‘, William and Mary Law Review (1999), voI. 40, 653–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., ‚Restorative Justice‘; in M. Tonry (ed), The Handbook of Crime and Punishment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V., ‚Situational Crime Prevention: Its Theoretical Basis and Practical Scope‘, in M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research (1983), vol 4, 225–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V. und Cornish, D., ‚Introduction‘ in R. V. Clarke and D. Cornish (eds), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending (New York: Springer-Verlag, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E. und Felson, M., ‚Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach‘, American Sociological Review (1979), vol 44, issue 4, 588–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J. und Moore, M. H., ‚Gun Control‘, in J. Q. Wilson and J. Petersilia (eds), Crime (San Francisco: ICS Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, R. A., ‚Penal Communications: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Punishment‘, Crime and Justice, An Annual Review of Research (1995), vol 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., Crime and Everyday Life, 2nd edn (Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, P., Sex Offender Community Notification (Washington DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T. J. und Longmire, D. R., Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fowles, A. J., ‚Monitoring Expenditure on the Criminal Justice System: The Search for Control‘, The Howard Journal (1990), 29 (2): 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaes, G., ‚Correctinal Treatment‘, in M. Tonry (ed), The Handbook of Crime and Punishment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D., ‚The Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in Contemporary Society‘, The British Journal of Criminology (1996), 36 (4): 445–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P. und Ross, R., ‚Revivication of Rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s’, Justice Quarterly (1987), vol 4, no 3, 349–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. und Hirschi, T., A General Theory of Crime (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A., Two Nations: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, Unequal (New York: Ballantine Books,1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C., ‚Fear of Crime: a Review of the Literature‘, International Review of Victimology (1996), vol 4, 79–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R., ‚Private Prisons‘ in M. Tonry (ed) The Handbook of Crime and Punishment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebenton, B. und Thomas, T., ‚Sexual Offenders in the Community: Reflections on Problems of Law, Community and Risk Management in the U. S. A., England and Wales‘, International Journal of the Sociology of Law (1996), 24: 427–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydebrand, W. und Seron, C., Rationalizing Justice: The Political Economy of the Federal District Courts (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R. und Garofalo, J., Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a theory of Victimization (Cambridge MA: Ballinger, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., Causes of Delinquency (Berkeley: University of California Press 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, R. und Shute, S., ‚Protecting the Public: Automatic Life Sentences, Parole and High Risk Offenders‘, Criminal Law Review, November 1996, 788–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Anxiety About Crime: Findings from the 1994 British Crime Survey (London: Horne Office, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. und Roberts, J., Attitudes to Punishment: Findings from the British 1996 Crime Survey (London: Home Office, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L., The Rebirth of Private Policing (London: Routledge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., ‚Auditing Criminal Justice‘, British Journal of Criminology (1993), vol 33, no 2, 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. und Newburn, T., Private Security and Public Policing (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurki, L., Restorative and Community Justice in the United States, Crime and Justice, vol. 27 (2000). 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N., ‚Government as Manager, Citizen as Consumer: The Case of the Criminal Justice Act of 1991‘, The Modern Law Review (1994), 57: 534–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P. A. und Farrington, D. P., ‚Crime and Justice in the United States and in England and Wales, 1981–96‘, Bureau of Justice Statistics Executive Summary (Washington DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxfield, M., ‚Lifestyle and Routine Activities Theories of Crime: Empirical Studies of Victimization, Delinquency and Offender Decision-Making‘, Journal of Quantitative Criminology (1987), vol 3, no 4, 275–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H., Public Health and Criminal Justice Approaches to Prevention, in M. Tonry and D. P. Farrington (eds), Building a Safer Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1995), 237–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., ‚The Return of the Wheelbarrow Men‘, British Journal of Criminology (2000), vol 40, no 1, 127–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., ‚Emotive and Ostentatious Punishments‘, Punishment & Society (2000), vol 2(4), 416–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raine, J. und Willson, M., Managing Criminal Justice (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., ‚Public Opinion, Crime and Criminal Justice‘, Crime and Justice (1992), vol 16, 99–180.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, B., ‚Victims & Vengeance: Why the Victims’ Rights Amendment is a Bad Idea‘, The Nation, 10 February 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearing, C., ‚The Relation Between Public and Private Policing‘, in M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds), Modem Policing (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 399–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straw, J., ‚The Criminal Justice Crisis‘, Criminal Justice Matters, no 26 (Winter 96/97).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C., ControI Balance: Towards a General Theory of Deviance (Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M., Sentencing Matters (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M., ‚Rethinking Unthinkable Punishment Policies in America‘, UCLA Law Review (1999), vol 46, no 6, 1751–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., Taming the System: The Control of Discretion in Criminal Justice, 1950–1990 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., Thinking About Crime, 2me edn (New York: Basic Books, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J., The Truly Disadvantaged (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E., ‚The New Politics of Criminal Justice‘, in D. Garland (ed), Mass Imprisonment in the USA (London: Sage, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. E. und Hawkins, G., Crime is Not the Problem: Lethal Violence in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. New York, USA

    David Garland

Authors
  1. David Garland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Garland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Präventionsforschung, Institut für Sicherheits- und, Hamburg, Germany

    Daniela Klimke

  2. Institut für Sicherheits- und Präventionsforschung, Hamburg, Germany

    Aldo Legnaro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garland, D. (2016). Kultur der Kontrolle. Verbrechensbekämpfung und soziale Ordnung in der Gegenwart. In: Klimke, D., Legnaro, A. (eds) Kriminologische Grundlagentexte. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06504-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06504-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06503-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06504-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation