Skip to main content

Regionale Innovationscluster und internationale Netzwerkkompetenz

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Motoren der Innovation

Zusammenfassung

Eines der Leitmotive der Forschung Hans Georg Gemündens ist die Netzwerkkompenz eines Unternehmens und im speziellen deren Bedeutung für den Innovationsprozess (Gemünden et al. 1992; Gemünden et al. 1996). Gemünden hat schon früh die Aneignung, das Zunutze Machen oder "Appropriierung" externen Wissens als notwendig zur Erreichung unternehmerischer Innovationsziele propagiert. Im Rahmen der „Open Innovation“ (Chesbrough, 2003) ist dieses Prinzip heute wie nie zuvor geradezu als zentrales Paradigma moderner Innovationen anerkannt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Agrawal, A., Kapur, D. & McHale, J. (2007): Birds of a Feather - Better Together? Exploring the Optimal Spatial Distribution of Ethnic Inventors, NBER Working Paper No w12823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A. & Kranton, R. E (2005): Identity and the Economics of Organizations. In: The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 9–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. & Stephan, P. (1996): Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology. In: The American Economic Review, 86 (3): 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. & Keilbach, M. (2005): The Mobility of Economic Agents as Conduits of Knowledge Spillovers. In: Fornahl, D., Zellner, C. & Audretsch, D. B. (Hrsg.): The Role of Labour Mobility and Informal Networks for Knowledge Transfer International Studies in Entrepreneurship (5. Aufl.): 8-25. Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. & Keilbach, M. (2007): The Theory of Knowledge Spillover Entrepreneurship. In: Journal of Management Studies, 44 (7): 1242–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. (1999): Managing across Boarders: The transnational solution. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beise, M., Gehrke, B. & Legler, H. (1999): Attraktivität Deutschlands und seiner Regionen für Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaktivitäten. In: Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 1: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beise, M. (2006): Die Lead-Markt-Strategie: Das Geheimnis weltweit erfolgreicher Innovationen. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beise, M. & Stahl, H. (1999): Public Research and Industrial Innovation in Germany. In: Research Policy, 28 (4): 397–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beise, M. & Rammer, Ch. (2006): Local User-Producer Interaction in Innovation and Export Performance of Firms. In: Small Business Economics, 27 (2-3): 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beise, M. & Gemünden, H. G. (2004): Lead Markets: A New Framework for the International Diffusion of Innovation. In: Management International Review, 44 (3): 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenzon, S. & Schankerman, M. (2009): University Knowledge Transfer: Private Ownership, Incentives and Local Development Objectives. In: Journal of Law and Economics, 52 (1): 111–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belenzon, S. & Schankerman, M. (2013): Spreading the word: geography, policy and university knowledge diffusion. In: The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95 (3): 884–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (1998): Appropriation and ontogeny: identifying compatibility between cognitive and sociocultural contributions to adult learning and development. In: International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17 (1): 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter, L. (2006): Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States. In: Journal of International Economics, 68 (2): 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, K. (2003): Customers’ perspectives of involvement in new product development. In: International Journal of Technology Management, 26 (5): 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buenstorf, G. & Schacht, A. (2013): We need to talk-or do we? Geographic distance and the commercialization of technologies from public research. In: Research Policy, 42 (2): 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappellin, R. (2004): International knowledge and innovation networks for European integration, cohesion, and enlargement. In: International Social Science Journal, 56 (180): 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairncross, F. (2001): The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution is Changing Our Lives. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2003): Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D. (1990): Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J. & Georghou, L. (2007): Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. In: Research Policy, 36 (7): 949–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006): Creating an Innovative Europe: Report of the Independent Expert Group on R & D and Innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit and chaired by Mr. Esko Aho, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007): A lead market initiative for Europe, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011): Final Evaluation of the Lead Market Initiative - Final Report, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1992): The Home Market Hypothesis Re-examined: The Impact of Domestic User- Producer Interaction on Export Specialisation. In: Lundvall, B.-A. (Hrsg.): National Systems of Innovation, London: 226-239. New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1995): User-Producer Interaction, Learning and Comparative Advantage. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19: 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., Friesike, S. & Daiber, M. (2014): Crowdsourcing as an Innovation Tool. In: Gassmann, O. & Schweitzer, F. (Hrsg.): Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation: 75- 87. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Ritter, T. & Heydebreck, P. (1996): Network configuration and innovation success: An empirical Analysis in German high-tech industries. In: International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13: 449–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Heydebreck, P. & Herden, R. (1992): Technological interweavement: a means of achieving innovation success. In: R & D Management, 22 (4): 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H. (1991): Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. In: European Economic Review, 35 (2–3): 517–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. (2000): R & D Spillovers, Technological Proximity, and Productivity Growth - Evidence from German Panel Data. In: Schmalenbach Business Review, 52: 238–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Henkel, J. & von Hippel, E. (2003): Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. In: Research policy, 32 (10): 1753–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstatt, C., Luthje, C. & Lettl, C. (2002): Wie fortschrittliche Kunden zu Innovationen stimulieren. In: Harvard Business Manager, 24 (1): 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, Eric v. (1988): Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. (2009): Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, F. (2012): Do cluster really matter for innovation practices in Information Technology? Questioning the significance of technological knowledge spillovers. In: Journal of Economic Geography, 12: 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M. (1999): International Knowledge Flows: Evidence From Patent Citations. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8 (1-2): 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993): Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations. In: The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3): 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamoche, K. & Beise-Zee, R. (2014): Knowledge appropriation, discourse and identity: a ‘property in knowledge’ perspective. In: Organization Studies (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. (2008): Ethnic Scientific Communities and International Technology Diffusion. In: The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90 (3): 518–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, P.J., Koka B.R. & Pathak, S. (2006): The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. In: Academy of Management Review, 31 (4): 833–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Staffan Burenstam, 1961, An Essay on Trade and Transformation, Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthje, C., Herstatt, C. & von Hippel, E. (2005): User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking. In: Research Policy, 34 (6): 951–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. (1920): Principles of Economics. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Krahmer, F. (2003): Lead-Märkte und Innovationsstandorte. In: Warnecke, H.-J. & Bullinger, H.-J. (Hrsg.): Kunststück Innovation: 23-28. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger, G., Beise, M. & Belitz, H. (1999): Innovationsstandorte Multinationaler Unternehmen: Internationalisierung technologischer Kompetenzen in der Pharmazeutik, Halbleiter- und Telekommunikationstechnik. In: Reihe: Technik, Wirtschaft, Politik, 37. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (1994): Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (2007): The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevant-Schreiber, J.J. (1968): Le Défi Américain. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (2012): Aufbruch nach Globalia. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. & Venables, A. J. (2004): Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. In: Journal of economic geography, 4 (4): 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1974): Social Identity and Intergroup Behaviour. In: Social Science Information, 2 (12): 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D. (2006): Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Portfolio Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966): International Investment and International Trade in the Product Life Cycle. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88: 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marian Beise-Zee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beise-Zee, M. (2014). Regionale Innovationscluster und internationale Netzwerkkompetenz. In: Schultz, C., Hölzle, K. (eds) Motoren der Innovation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06135-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics