Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften

Einflussfaktoren auf die Planung und Form der Unternehmensnachfolge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspektiven der Wirtschaftswissenschaften

  • 6323 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In den vergangenen zehn Jahren hat die Thematik der altersbedingten Unternehmensnachfolge in der mittelständischen Wirtschaft verstärkt an Bekanntheit und Bedeutung gewonnen. Vor allem für inhabergeführte mittelständische Unternehmen gestaltet sich die Unternehmensnachfolge als komplexer Prozess und bedarf einer langfristigen Vorbereitung. Dies ist der Tatsache geschuldet, dass die Unternehmensführerin oder der Unternehmensführer hier sowohl das Eigentum am Unternehmen als auch dessen Leitung innehaben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. [1]Belk, R. W. (1988): Possessions and the extended self. In: Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (2), S. 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmann, H., Cesinger, B., Ostertag, F. (2012): Unternehmerische Absichten und Aktivitäten von Studierenden in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. Ergebnisse des Global University Spi-rit Students‘ Survey (GUESSS). Forschungsbericht. Stiftungslehrstuhl Entre-preneurship der Uni-versität Hohenheim, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boeker, W., Karichalil, R. (2002): Entrepreneurial Transitions: Factors Influencing Founder Depar-ture. In: Academy of Management Journal, 45 (3), S. 818–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., Robinson, S. L. (2005): Territoriality in organizations. In: Academy of Management Review, 30(3), S. 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruce, D., Picard, D. (2006): Making succession a success: Perspectives from Canadian small and medium-sized enterprises. In: Journal of Small Business Management, 44 (2), S. 306–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabrera-Suárez, K. (2005): Leadership transfer and the successor’s development in the family firm. In: The Leadership Quarterly, 16(1), S. 71–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cabrera-Suárez, K., Martín-Santana, J. (2012): Successor’s commitment and succession success: dimensions and antecedents in the small Spanish family firm. In: The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23 (13), S. 2736–2762.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cardon, M., S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B. P., Davis, C. (2005): A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (1), S. 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chirico, F. (2008): Knowledge accumulation in family firms. In: International Small Business Jour-nal, 26 (4), S. 433–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. DeTienne, D. R. (2010): Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (2), S. 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. DeTienne, D.R., Cardon, M. S. (2012): Impact of founder experience on exit intention. In: Small Business Economics, 38 (4), S. 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dirks, K. T., Cummings, L. L., Pierce, J. L. (1996): Psychological ownership in organizations: Condi-tions under which individuals promote and resist change. In R. W. Woodman & W. A. Pasmore (Eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 9: S. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Diwisch, D. S., Voithofer, P., Weiss, C. R. (2009): Succession and firm growth: results from a non-parametric matching approach. In: Small Business Economics, 32 (1), S. 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fueglistaller, U., Müller, C., Volery, T. (2012): Entrepreneurship Modelle – Umsetzung – Perspekti-ven mit Fallbeispielen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, 3. Auflage, Springer-Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fueglistaller, U., Müller, C., Volery, T. (2008): Entrepreneurship Modelle – Umsetzung – Perspekti-ven mit Fallbeispielen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, Springer-Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia-Alvarez, E., Lopez-Sintas, J., Gonzalvo, P. S. (2002): Socialization patterns of successors in first to second generation family business. In: Family Business Review, 15(3), S. 189–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. [17]Geißler, M. (2013): Determinanten des Vorgründungsprozesses - Einfluss unternehmerischer Chancen und des Gründungsklimas im Hochschulumfeld, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Geißler, M., Jahn, S., Häfner, P. (2010): The Entrepreneurial Climate at Universities: The Impact of Organizational Factors. In: The Theory and Practice of Entrepreneurship, eds. Smallbone, D., Leit-ao, J., Raposo, M., Welter, F., & Elgar, E: Cheltenham, UK, 12–31.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griffeth, R. W., Allen, D. A., Barrett, R. (2006): Integration of family-owned business succession with turnover and life cycle models: Development ofa successor retention process model. In: Hu-man Resource Management Review, 16 (4), S. 490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grundström, C., Öberg, C., Öhrwall Rönnbäck, A. (2012): Family-owned manufacturing SMEs and innovativeness: A comparison between within-family successions and external takeovers. In: Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3 (3), S. 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Handler, W. C., Kram, K. E. (1988): Succession in family firms: The problem of resistance. In: Family Business Review, 1(4), S. 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Handler, W. (1994): Succession in family business: Are view of the research. In: Family Business Review, 7(2), S. 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hauser, H.-E., Kay, R., Boerger, S. (2010): Unternehmensnachfolgen in Deutschland 2010 bis 2014 - Schätzung mit weiterentwickeltem Verfahren -. In: IfM Bonn (Hrsg.): IfM-Materialien Nr. 198, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haveman, H. A., Khaire, M. V. (2004): Survival beyond succession? The contingent impact of founder succession on organizational failure. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (3), S. 437–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoang, H., Gimeno, J. (2010): Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneuri-al transitions and persistence in founding. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), S. 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Howorth, C., Westhead, P., Wright, M. (2004): Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), S. 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., Steier, L. P. (2004): Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. In: Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 28 (4), S. 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luce, M. F. (1998): Choosing to avoid: Coping with negatively emotion-laden consumer decisions. In: Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), S. 409–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall, J., Sorenson, R., Brigham, K., Wieling, E., Reifman, A., Wampler, R. (2006): The paradox for the family firm CEO: Owner age relationship to succession-related processes and plans. In: Jour-nal of Business Venturing, 21 (3), S. 348–368.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martins, E. (2010): Psychological ownership in Organisationen. Explorative Untersuchung der Antezedenzen und des Entstehungsprozesses, Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moog, P, Kay, R., Schlömer-Laufen, N., Schlepphorst, S. (2012):Unternehmensnachfolgen in Deutsch-land – Aktuelle Trends, IfM-Materialien Nr. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morris, M. H., Williams, R. W., Allen, J. A., Avila, R. A. (1997): Correlates of Success in Family Busi-ness Transitions. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 12 (5), S. 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morris, M. H., Williams, R. W., Nel, D. (1996): Factors influencing family business succes-sion. In: International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 2(3), S. 68–81.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nordqvist, M., Wennberg, K., Bau, M., Hellerstedt, K. (2013): An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. In: Small Business Economics, 40 (4), S. 1087–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peng, H. (2013): Why and when do people hide knowledge?. In: Journal of Knowledge Manage-ment, 17 (3), S. 398–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Peay, T., Dyer W. Jr, (1989): Power orientations of entrepreneurs and succession planning. In: Journal of Small Business Management, 27(1), S. 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., Dirks, K. T. (2001): Towards a theory of psychological ownership in organi-zations. In: Academy of Management Review, 26 (2), S. 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  38. [38]Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., Dirks, K. T. (2003): The state of psychological ownership: Integrat-ing and extending a century of research. In: Review of eneral Psychology, 7 (1), S. 84–107.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S., Morgan, S. (1991): Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. In: Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), S. 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I. (2011): Psychological ownership and the organizational context: theory, research evidence, and application, Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pott, O., Pott, A. (2012): Entrepreneurship: Unternehmensgründung, unternehmerisches Handeln und rechtliche Aspekte, Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  42. [42]Raymond Family Business Institute, Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company (2003): American Family Business Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft und Arbeit (SMWA) (Hrsg.) (2006): Sächsischer Mittelstandsbericht 2005/2006, Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Scholes, M., Wright, M., Westhead, P., Burrows, A., Bruining, H. (2007): Information sharing, price negotiation and management buy-outs of private family-owned firms. In: Small Business Econom-ics, 29(3), S. 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schumann, A., Evers, M. (2012): DIHK-Report zur Unternehmensnachfolge 2012, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shepherd, D., Wiklund, J., Haynie, J. (2009): Moving forward: Balancing the financial and emotional costs of business failure. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 24(2), S. 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J., Chua, J. (2003): Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), S. 667–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D. R., Cardon, M. S. (2010): Reconceptualizing entre-preneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (4), S. 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Whatley, L. (2011): A New model for Family Owned Business Succession. In: Organization Deve-lopment Journal, 29 (4), S. 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wright, M., Thompson, S., Robbie, K. (1992): Venture capital and management-led, lever-aged buy-outs: A European perspective. In: Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), S. 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Woywode, M., Keese, D., Tänzler, J.-K., Hauer, A. (2011): Der Beirat im deutschen Mittel-stand – Ein empirischer Vergleich zwischen mittelständischen Familienunternehmen und Nicht-Familienunternehmen. In: Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung und Praxis. 63 (6), S. 628–640.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemnitz, Deutschland

    Univ.-Prof. Dr. Cornelia Zanger, Jun.-Prof. Dr. Mario Geißler & Susanne Schübel

Authors
  1. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Cornelia Zanger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun.-Prof. Dr. Mario Geißler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susanne Schübel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Zanger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät Wirschaftswissenschaften, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany

    Dagmar Gesmann-Nuissl

  2. Fakultät Wirschaftswissenschaften, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany

    Ronald Hartz

  3. Fakultät Wirschaftswissenschaften, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany

    Marcus Dittrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zanger, C., Geißler, M., Schübel, S. (2014). Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften. In: Gesmann-Nuissl, D., Hartz, R., Dittrich, M. (eds) Perspektiven der Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03600-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03600-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03599-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03600-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation