Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regionale Wertschöpfung und der Einfluss des Promotorennetzwerks – eine Analyse des Innovationssystems der Stadt Ingolstadt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pionier-Regionen der Zukunft

Part of the book series: Entrepreneurial Management und Standortentwicklung ((EMUS,volume 5))

  • 2478 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Globaler Wettbewerb und komplex strukturierte Wertschöpfungsprozesse, zusammengesetzt aus diversen hochspezialisierten Akteuren, stellen den Standard der Wertschöpfung im einundzwanzigsten Jahrhundert dar. Dennoch identifiziert Porter (1998, S. 77-78) “Paradoxically, the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy lie increasingly in local things - knowledge, relationships, and motivation that distant rivals cannot match […] innovation and competitive success in so many fields are geographically concentrated.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Asheim, B. T./Coenen, L. (2005): Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. In: Research Policy, Jg. 34, Nr. 8, S. 1173–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, B. T./Isaksen, A./Nauwelaers, C./Tötdling, F. (2003): Regional innovation policy for smallmedium enterprises. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • AUDI AG (2010): Annual Report 2010. Ingolstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D./Lehmann, E. E. (2005): Does the Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship hold for Regions? In: Research Policy, Jg. 34, S. 1191–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. (2005): Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. In: Regional Studies, Jg. 39, Nr. 1, S. 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, S. (2002): Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems. In: Technovation, Jg. 22, Nr. 8, S. 485–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, L./Moodysson, J./Asheim, B. T. (2004): Nodes, networks and proximities: on the knowledge dynamics of the Medicon Valley biotech cluster. In: European Planning Studies, Jg. 12, Nr. 7, S. 1003–1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P. (2004): Regional innovation systems: an evolutionary approach. In: Cooke, P./Heidenreich, M./Braczyk, H.-J. (Hrsg.): Regional Innovation Systems: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World, London, S. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, P./Boekholt, P./Tödtling, F. (2000): The governance of innovation in Europe. Regional perspectives on global competitiveness.Pinter, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corno, F./Reinmoeller, P./Nonaka, I. (1999): Knowledge Creation within Industrial Systems. In: Journal of Management and Governance, Jg. 3, Nr. 4, S. 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Bondt, R. (1997): Spillovers and innovative activities. In: International Journal of Industrial Organization, Jg. 15, Nr. 1, S. 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D. (2003): Regional Innovation Systems in the Periphery: The Case of the Beauce in Québec (Canada). In: International Journal of Innovation Management, Jg. 7, Nr. 1, S. 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloreux, D./Parto, S. (2005): Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. In: Technology in Society, Jg. 27, Nr. 2, S. 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton, G./Puga, D. (2000): Diversity and Specialisation in Cities: Why, Where and When does it matter? In: Urban Studies, Jg. 37, Nr. 3, S. 533–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzisah, J./Etzkowitz, H. (2012): The age of knowledge. The dynamics of universities, knowledge and society.Leiden; Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, R. H. (2011): Localized Spillovers and Knowledge Flows: How Does Proximity Influence the Performance of Plants? In: Economic Geography. Jg. 87, Jg. 2, S. 127–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2002): Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of University– industry–government networks. In: Science and Public Policy, Jg. 29, Nr. 2, S. 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H./Klofsten, M. (2005): The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. In: R & D Management, Jg. 35, Nr. 3, S. 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H./Leydesdorff, L. (2000): The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and „Mode 2“ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. In Research Policy, Jg. 29, Nr. 2, S. 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichter, K. (2005): Innovation Communities. Die Rolle von Promotorennetzwerken bei Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen. In: Pfriem/Antes/Fichter/Müller/Paech/Seuring/ Siebenhüner (Hrsg.): Innovationen für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Gabler, Wiesbaden, S. 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichter, K. (2009): Innovation communities: the role of networks of promotors in Open Innovation. In: R & D Management Journal, Jg. 39, Nr. 4, S. 357–372.Gemünden/Walter 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L/Kallal, H. D./Scheinkman, J. A./Shleifer, A. (1992): Growth in cities. In: Journal of Political Economy. Jg. 100, Nr. 6, S. 1126–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, S. J./Freshwater, D. (2001): State-Level Determinants of Entrepreneurship and a Preliminary Measure of Entrepreneurial Climate. In: Economic Development Quarterly, Jg. 15, Nr. 1, S. 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J./Chakrabarti, A.K. (1988): Arbeitsteilung im Innovationsmanagement– Forschungsergebnisse, Kriterien und Modelle. In: Zeitschrift Führung und Organization, Jg. 57, Nr. 6, S. 378–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, J./Salomo, S. (2011): Innovationsmanagement. 5. Jg. Vahlen, München. Henry, N./Massey, D./Wield, D. (1995): Along the road: R & D, society and space. In: Research Policy, Jg. 24, Nr. 5, S. 707–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G.M. (1988): Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howells, J. (1999): Research and technology outsourcing. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Jg. 11, Nr. 1, S. 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legler, H./Frietsch, R. (2006): Neuabgrenzung der Wissenswirtschaft – Forschungsintensive Industrien und wissensintensive Dienstleistungen (NIW/ISI-Listen 2006). Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem. Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L./Fritsch, M. (2006): Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics. Triple helix Indicators of Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems. In: Research Policy, Jg. 35, Nr. 10, S. 1538–1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, L.H./Mohan, R.N./Aram, J.D. (1996): Linking technology and institutions: the innovation community framework. In: Research Policy, Jg. 25, Nr. 1, S. 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M. M. (2006): Innovation, networks, and knowledge spillovers. Selected essays. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D. (2006): Economics of knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K./van Oort, F./Verburg, T. (2007): Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. In: Regional Studies, Jg. 41, Nr. 5, S. 685–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. (2000): R & D Spillovers, Technological Proximity, And Productivity Growth – Evidence From German Panel Data. In: Schmalenbach Business Review, Jg. 52, Nr. 3, S. 238–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1969): The Economy of Cities. Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, G./Wagner, K. (1999): Knowledge Transfer and Innovation in Germany and Britain: ’Intermediate Institution’ Models of Knowledge Transfer under Strain? In: Industry and Innowatton, Jg. 6, Nr. 1, S. 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, P. (2006): Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university– industry relationships drive economic growth. Triple helix Indicators of Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems. In: Research Policy, Jg. 35, Nr. 10, S. 1499–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (1993, Hrsg.): National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2000a): Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation Systems. In: Organization Studies, Jg. 21, Nr. 5, S. 915–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pechlaner, H./Bachinger, M. (2010): Knowledge networks of innovative businesses: an explorative study in the region of Ingolstadt. In: The Service Industries Journal, Jg. 30, Nr. 10, S. 1737–1756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S./Rubinfeld, D. L. (2009): Microeconomics. Pearson/Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1998): Clusters and the new economics of competition. In: Harvard Business Review, Jg. 76, Nr. 6, S. 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prognos (2010a): Prognos Zukunftsatlas 2010 - Deutschlands Regionen im Zukunftswettbewerb. Berlin u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prognos (2010b). Impact-Analyze des Wissenschaftsstandortes Europäische Metropolregion München (EMM). Prognos: Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J.B. (2000): Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth. In: Sloan management review, Jg. 41, Nr. 4, S. 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, C. (2007): Unterstützungsnetzwerke von Gründern wissensintensiver Unternehmen. Zur Bedeutung der regionalen gründungsunterstützenden Infrastruktur. Selbstverlag, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1990): Regional networks and the resurgence of Silicon Valley. In California Management Review, Jg. 33, Nr. 1, S. 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schamp, E. W. (2002): Evolution und Institution als Grundlagen einer dynamischen Wirtschaftsgeographie: Die Bedeutung von externen Skalenerträgen für geographische Konzentration. In: Geographische Zeitschrift. Jg. 90, Nr. 1, S. 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schamp, E. W./Rentmeister, B./Lo, V. (2004): Dimensions of Proximity in Knowledgebased Networks: The Cases of Investment Banking and Automobile Design. In: European Planning Studies. Jg. 12, Nr. 5, S. 607–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schartinger, D./Schibany, A./Gassler, H. (2001): Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, Jg. 26, Nr. 3, S. 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield, M. (1993): A Model of Institutional Hysteresis. In: Journal of Economic Issues, Jg. 27, Nr. 3, S. 755–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2000): Innovation networks and regional development – evidence from the European Regional Innovation Survey (ERIS). European Planning Studies, Jg. 8, Nr. 4, S. 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2007): Entrepreneurship, proximity and regional innovation systems. In: Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Jg. 98, Nr. 5, S. 652–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurs, G. (1995): Inter-industry R & D spillovers: What difference do they make? In: International Journal of Industrial Organization, Jg. 13, Nr. 2, S. 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M./Scott, A. J. (1995): The wealth of regions: Market forces and policy imperatives in local and global context. In: Futures, Jg. 27, Nr. 5, S. 505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M./Veneables, A.J. (2004): Buzz: Face-to-Face contact and the Urban Economy. In: Journal of Economic Geography, Jg. 4, Nr. 4, S. 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierstein, A./Bentlage, M./Pechlaner, H./Doepfer, B.C./Brandt, A./Drangmeister, C./Schrödl, D./Voßen, D./Floeting, H./Buser, B.: Wertschöpfungskompetenz der Region Ingolstadt, München 2011, online verfügbar unter:www.wertschöpfungplus.de.Torre/Gilly 2000

  • Uzzi, B. (1996): The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. In: American Sociological Review, Jg. 61, Nr. 4, S. 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga, A. (2000): Local Academic Knowledge Transfers and the Concentration of Economic Activity. In: Journal of Regional Science, Jg. 40, Nr. 2, S. 289–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, G. M./Courtney, R. (2007): The Organization of Innovation Brokers: An International Review. In: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Jg. 19, Nr. 6, S. 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, E. (1973): Organization für Innovationsentscheidungen: Das Promotoren- Modell. Schwartz, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, E. (1999): Das Promotoren-Modell. In: Hauschildt/Gemünden (Hrsg.): Promotoren. Champions der Innovation. 2. Jg., Gabler, Wiesbaden, S. 9–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. mm1 Consulting & Management PartG, Stuutgart, Deutschland

    Dr. Benedict C. Doepfer

Authors
  1. Dr. Benedict C. Doepfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedict C. Doepfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Harald Pechlaner

  2. Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Christopher Reuter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doepfer, B. (2014). Regionale Wertschöpfung und der Einfluss des Promotorennetzwerks – eine Analyse des Innovationssystems der Stadt Ingolstadt. In: Pechlaner, H., Reuter, C. (eds) Pionier-Regionen der Zukunft. Entrepreneurial Management und Standortentwicklung, vol 5. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03565-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03565-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-03564-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-03565-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation