Skip to main content

Choose Your Ad Paper Type Carefully: How Haptic Ad Paper Characteristics Affect Product Judgments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. IV)

Part of the book series: EAA Series ((EAA))

  • 4964 Accesses

Abstract

While consumers are browsing through the pages of a magazine, they are confronted with numerous print ads – and as research shows, most of them will be ignored or considered incidentally. Consumer’s ad exposure is extremely short.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman , J. M.; Nocera, C. C. and J. A. Bargh (2010), “Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions,” in: Science, Vol. 328, 1712–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. (2010), “Persuasive Advertising: Evidence-based Principles,” Basingstoke, Pal-grave Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999), “Perceptual symbol systems,” in: Behavioral Brain Science, Vol. 22, 577- 600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008), “Grounded cognition,” in: Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 59, 617–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2010), ”Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future,” in: Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 2, 716–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou , L. W.; Simmons, W. K.; Barbey, A. K. and C. D. Wilson (2003), “Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems,” in: Trends in Cognitive Science, Vol. 7(2),84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casson, R. W. (1983), “Schemata in cognitive anthropology,” in: Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 12, 429–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citrin , A. V.; Stem, D. E.; Spangenberg, E. R. and M. J. Clark (2003), “Consumer Need for Tactile Input: An Internet Retailing Challenge,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56(11),915–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. and A. B. Markman (1994), “Structural alignment in comparisons: No difference without similarity,” in: Psychological Science, Vol. 5(3),152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. and A. B. Markman (1997), “Structure mapping in analogy and similarity,” in: Ameri-can Psychologist, Vol. 52(1),45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampel , S.; Heinrich, D. and C. Campbell (2012), “Is an Advertisement Worth the Paper it’s Print-ed on? The Impact of Premium Print Advertising on Consumer Perceptions,“ in: Journal of Ad-vertising Research, Vol. 52(1),41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzky, R. L. and S. J. Lederman (1992), “Stages of manual exploration in haptic object identifica-tion,” in: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 52(6),661–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, S. J. and R. L. Klatzky (1987), “Hand Movements: A Window into Haptic Object Recognition,” in: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 19(3),342–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, S. J. and R. L. Klatzky (1993), “Extracting haptic object properties through haptic exploration,” in: Acta psychologica, Vol. 84, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, A. B. and D. Gentner (1993), “Splitting the differences: A structural alignment view of similarity,” in: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 32(4),517–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, N. and C. V. Jansson-Boyd (2011), “To touch or not to touch; that is the question. Should consumers always be encouraged to touch products, and does it always alter product percep-tion,” in: Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 28(3),256–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (1975), “A framework for representing knowledge”, in: Winston, P. H. (ed.): The psychology of computer vision, McGraw Hill, New York, 211–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. L. (2004), “The big book of concepts,” Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2010), “Does touch matter? Insights from haptic research in marketing,” in: Krishna, A. (ed.): Sensory marketing: Research on the sensuality of products, Routledge, New York, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and T. L. Childers (2003a), “Individual differences in haptic information processing: The ‘need for touch’ scale,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30, 430–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and T. L. Childers (2003b), “To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments,” in: Journal of Marketing,Vol. 67, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and T. L. Childers (2006), “If I touch it I have to have it: Individual and environmental influences on impulse purchasing,” in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, 765–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and T. L. Childers (2008), “Effects of sensory factors on consumer behaviour: If it tastes, smells, sounds, and feels like a duck, then it must be a ...,” in: Haugtvedt , C. P.; Herr, P. M.; Kardes, F. R. (eds.): Handbook of consumer psychology, Psychology Press, New York, 193–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and S. B. Shu (2009), “The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership,” in: Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 36(3),434–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and J. Wiggins (2006), “It just feels good: Customers’ affective response to touch and its influence on persuasion,” in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 70, 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. and J. Wiggins Johnson (2011), “Autotelic need for touch, haptics, and persuasion: The role of involvement,” in: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 28(3),222–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (2006), “The basic-systems model of episodic memory,” in: Perspectives on Psycho-logical Science, Vol. 1, 277–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. E. and J. A. Bargh (2008), “Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth,” in; Science, Vol. 322, 606–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S. and A. B. Markman (2001), “Processing product unique features: Alignability and in-volvement in preference construction,” in: Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 11(1),13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Langner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langner, T., Fischer, A., Brune, P. (2013). Choose Your Ad Paper Type Carefully: How Haptic Ad Paper Characteristics Affect Product Judgments. In: Rosengren, S., Dahlén, M., Okazaki, S. (eds) Advances in Advertising Research (Vol. IV). EAA Series. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02365-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics