Skip to main content

Migrantenfamilien

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Familiensoziologie

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag diskutiert zentrale Begriffe, theoretische Perspektiven und Erklärungsansätze sowie ausgewählte empirische Befunde am Schnittpunkt von Migrations- und Familiensoziologie. Argumentiert wird für eine stärkere Wahrnehmung des Merkmals Migration in der familiensoziologischen Forschung. Die vielfältige Bedeutung von Migration für Familie und umgekehrt von Familie für Migration wird für die drei Bereiche Wanderungserfahrung, Eingliederungs- und Minoritätserfahrung im Zielland und Herkunftslandbezug ausgeführt. Alle drei Ebenen müssen für das Verständnis von Migrantenfamilien berücksichtigt werden. Anhand vier familiensoziologischer Themenfelder werden die bisherige Forschung und zentrale Erkenntnisse zum Komplex Migrantenfamilien auszugsweise vorgestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abadan-Unat, N. 1977. Implications of migration on emancipation and pseudo-emancipation of Turkish women. International Migration Review 11: 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R., Logan, J., Lutz, A., Stults, B. 2002. Only English by the third generation? Loss and preservation of the mother tongue among the grandchildren of contemporary immigrants. Demography 39: 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R., Kasinitz, P., Waters, M. C. 2011. Th e kids are (mostly) alright: Second-generation assimilation: Comments on Haller, Portes and Lynch. Social Forces 89: 763–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelina, A., Faist, T. 2012. De-naturalizing the national in research methodologies: Key concepts of transnational studies in migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35: 1707–1724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andall, J. 2012. Gendered mobilities and work in Europe: An introduction. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39: 525–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apitzsch, U. 2014. Transmission und Wandel in mehrgenerationalen Migrationsfamilien. S. 195–216 in: H. Weiss, P. Schnell, G. Ateş (Hg.): Zwischen den Generationen. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aybek, C., Straßburger, G., Yüksel-Kaptanoglu, I. 2013. Marriage migration from Turkey to Germany: Risks and coping strategies of transnational couples. In: C. Aybek, J. Huinink, R. Muttarak (Hg.): Spatial mobility, migration, and family dynamics. Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bade, K. J., Bommes, M. 2004. Einleitung Th emenheft Migration – Integration – Bildung. Grundfragen und Problembereiche. IMIS-Beiträge 23: 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A., Boyle, P. 2004. Untying and retying family migration in the new Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30: 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L. 2007. Transnational families and age care: Th e mobility of care and the migrancy of ageing. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33: 275–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldassar, L., Merla, L. (Hg.) 2014. Transnational families, migration, and care work. New York, Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H. 2008. Reliable bonds? A comparative perspective of intergenerational support patterns among migrant families in Germany. S. 285–312 in: C. Saraceno (Hg.): Families, ageing and social policy. Intergenerational solidarity in European welfare states. Cheltenham, Northampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H. 2013a. Returning, staying, or both? Mobility patterns among elderly Turkish migrants aft er retirement. Transnational Social Review – A Social Work Journal 3: 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H. 2013b. Generationenbeziehungen im Alter: Türkische Familien in der Türkei und in Westeuropa. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 25: 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H., Fuß, D. 2009. Heiratsmigration nach Deutschland: Determinanten der transnationalen Partnerwahl türkeistämmiger Migranten. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 34: 135–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H., Klaus, D., Steinbach, A. 2011. Generationenbeziehungen in Deutschland. Ein Vergleich der Beziehungsqualität in einheimischen deutschen Familien, Familien mit türkischem Migrationshintergrund und Aussiedlerfamilien. S. 259–286 in: J. Brüderl, L. Castiglioni, N. Schumann (Hg.): Partnerschaft, Fertilität und intergenerationale Beziehungen. Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baykara-Krumme, H., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Schimany, P. (Hg.) 2012. Viele Welten des Alterns? Ältere Migranten im alternden Deutschland. Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R., Beck, M. 2012. Herkunft seff ekte oder statistische Diskriminierung von Migrantenkindern in der Primarstufe? S. 137–163 in: R. Becker, H. Solga (Hg.): Soziologische Bildungsforschung. Sonderheft 52 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, H., Ehlert, N. 2011. Familie, Bindungen und Fürsorge: Familiärer Wandel in einer vielfältigen Moderne. Leverkusen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolzman, C., Fibbi, R., Vial, M. 2006. What to do aft er retirement? Elderly migrants and the question of return. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 32: 1359–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boos-Nünning, U., Karakasoglu, Y. 2005. Viele Welten leben. Zur Lebenssituation von Mädchen und jungen Frauen mit Migrationshintergrund. Münster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. 1989. Family and personal networks in international migration: Recent developements and new agendas. International Migration Review 23: 638–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carling, J., Menjívar, C., Schmalzbauer, L. 2012. Central themes in the study of transnational parenthood. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38: 191–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnein, M., Baykara-Krumme, H. 2013. Einstellungen zur familialen Solidarität im Alter: Eine vergleichende Analyse mit türkischen Migranten und Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 25: 29–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celik, K., Bespinar, U., Kalaycioglu, S. 2013. Experiences of stay-behind women in international migration. S. 235–250 in: T. Geisen, T. Studer, E. Yildiz (Hg.): Migration, Familie und soziale Lage. Beiträge zu Bildung, Gender und Care. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes, I. V., Wagner, M., Naderi, R. 2013. Marriage and family formation of Germans and Turkish migrants in Germany. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 65: 479–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K. 2005. Unhappy husbands: Masculinity and migration in transnational Pakistani marriages. Th e Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 11: 85–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K. 2007. Risk, trust, gender and transnational cousin marriage among British Pakistanis. Ethnic and Racial Studies 30: 1117–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K. (Hg.) 2012. Transnational marriage. New perspectives from Europe and beyond. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsley, K., Liversage, A. 2013. Transforming polygamy: Migration, transnationalism and multiple marriages among Muslim minorities. Global Networks 13: 60–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cong, Z., Silverstein, M. 2011. Intergenerational exchange between parents and migrant and nonmigrant sons in rural China. Journal of Marriage and Family 73: 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crul, M., Schneider, J. 2010. Comparative integration context theory: Participation and belonging in new diverse European cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies 33: 1249–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haas, H., Van Rooij, A. 2010. Migration as emancipation? Th e impact of internal and international migration on the position of women left behind in rural Morocco. Oxford Development Studies 38: 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valk, H. A. G., Billari, F. C. 2007. Living arrangements of migrant and Dutch young adults: Th e family infl uence disentangled. Population Studies 61: 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Valk, H. A. G., Schans, D. 2008. “Th ey ought to do this for their parents”: Perceptions of fi lial obligations among immigrant and Dutch older people. Ageing and Society 28: 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valk, H. A. G. 2013. Intergenerational discrepancies in fertility preferences among immigrant and Dutch families. Th e History of the Family 18: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valk, H. A. G., Milewski, N. 2011. Family life transitions among children of immigrants: An introduction. Advances in Life Course Research 16: 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valk, H. A. G., Liefb roer, A. C. 2007. Timing preferences for women’s family-life transitions: Intergenerational transmission among migrants and Dutch. Journal of Marriage and Family 69: 190–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diefenbach, H. 2010. Kinder und Jugendliche aus Migrantenfamilien im deutschen Bildungssystem. Erklärungen und empirische Befunde. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, C., Koenig, M., Ruckdeschel, K. 2009. Religiosity and gender-equality. Comparing Natives and Muslim migrants in Germany. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32: 278–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato, K. M., Duncan, E. M. 2011. Migration, social networks, and child health in Mexican families. Journal of Marriage and Family 73: 713–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dribe, M., Lundh, C. 2012. Intermarriage, value context and union dissolution: Sweden 1990–2005. European Journal of Population – Revue Européenne de Démographie 28: 139–158. Esser, H. 1980. Aspekte der Wanderungssoziologie. Darmstadt, Neuwied.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. 2008. Assimilation, ethnische Schichtung oder selektive Akkulturation? Neuere Th eorien der Eingliederung von Migranten und das Modell der intergenerationalen Integration. S. 81–107

    Google Scholar 

  • in: F. Kalter (Hg.): Migration und Integration. Sonderheft 48 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerald, D. 2012. A comparativist manifesto for international migration studies. Ethnic and Racial Studies 35: 1725–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, N. 1997. Th e immigrant family: Cultural legacies and cultural change. International Migration Review 31: 961–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foner, N., Dreby, J. 2011. Relations between the generations in immigrant families. Annual Review of Sociology 37: 545–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R., Heuveline, P. 2008. A crossover in Mexican and Mexican-American fertility rates: Evidence and explanations for an emerging paradox. Demographic Research 12: 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisen, T. 2014. Multilokale Existenzweisen von Familien im Kontext von Migration. Herausforderungen für Forschung und Th eorieentwicklung. S. 27–57 in: T. Geisen, T. Studer, E. Yildiz (Hg.): Migration, Familie und Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisen, T., Parrenas, R. 2013. Transnational mothering: A source of gender confl ict in the family. S. 169–194 in: T. Geisen, T. Studer, E. Yildiz (Hg.): Migration, Familie und soziale Lage. Beiträge zu Bildung, Gender und Care. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, J. E. 2010. Connecting complex processes: A decade of research on immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family 72: 498–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glowsky, D. 2011. Globale Partnerwahl. Soziale Ungleichheit als Motor transnationaler Heiratsentscheidungen. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Ferrer, A. 2006. Who do immigrants marry? Partner choice among single immigrants in Germany. European Sociological Review 22: 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. M. 1964. Assimilation in American life. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjar, A., Boehnke, K., Knafo, A., Daniel, E., Musiol, A.-L., Schiefer, D., Möllering, A. 2014. Intergenerationale Werteähnlichkeit, Distanz zu gesellschaft lichen Mainstream-Werten und subjektives Wohlbefi nden von MigrantInnen. S. 49–69 in: H. Weiss, P. Schnell, G. Ateş (Hg.): Zwischen den Generationen. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, W., Portes, A., Lynch, S. M. 2011. Dreams fulfi lled, dreams shattered: Determinants of segmented assimilation in the second generation. Social Forces 89: 733–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartung, A., Vandezande, V., Phalet, K., Swyngedouw, M. 2011. Partnership preferences of the Belgian second generation: Who lives with whom? Advances in Life Course Research 16: 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, S. 2008. Migration networks and migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34: 585–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hense, A., Schorch, M. 2013. Arranged marriages as support for intra-ethnic matchmaking? A case study on Muslim migrants in Germany. International Migration 51: 104–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herwartz-Emden, L. (Hg.) 2003. Einwandererfamilien. Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herwartz-Emden, L. 2003. Einleitung: Geschlechterverhältnis, Familie und Migration. S. 9–50 in L. Herwartz-Emden (Hg.): Einwandererfamilien. Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerder, D. 2014. From Anglo settlers to Caribbean domestics: Th e multiple routes to reconstituting immigrant families in Canada. S. 73–90 in: T. Geisen, T. Studer, E. Yildiz (Hg.): Migration, Familie und Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huschek, D., De Valk, H. A. G., Liefb roer, A. C. 2012. Partner choice patterns among the descendants of Turkish immigrants in Europe. European Journal of Population – Revue Européenne de Démographie 28: 241–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idema, H., Phalet, K. 2007. Transmission of gender-role values in Turkish-German migrant families: Th e role of gender, intergenerational and intercultural relations. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 19: 71–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M. 1998. Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalter, F. 2008. Einleitung. Stand, Herausforderungen und Perspektiven der empirischen Migrationsforschung. S. 11–36 in: F. Kalter (Hg.): Migration und Integration. Sonderheft 48 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalter, F. 2010. Migration. S. 197–200 in: J. Kopp, B. Schäfers (Hg.): Grundbegriff e der Soziologie. 10. Aufl age. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, W., Massey, D. S. 2002. Th e culture of Mexican migration: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Social Forces 80: 981–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karthick Ramakrishnan, S. 2004. Second-generation immigrants? Th e “2.5 Generation” in the United States. Social Science Quarterly 85: 380–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, A. 2009. Mutter-Tochter-Beziehungen in der Migration. Biographische Erfahrungen im alevitischen und sunnitischen Kontext. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., Kespichayawattana, J., Saengtienchai, C. Wiwatwanich, S. 2010. How left behind are rural parents of migrant children? Evidence from Th ailand. Ageing and Society 30: 811–841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koc, I., Onan, I. 2004. International migrant’s remittances and welfare status of the left –behind families in Turkey. International Migration Review 38: 78–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, E. 2004. Family-related migration: A critical review of European studies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 20: 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, E., Kraler, A., Kohli, M., Schmoll, C. 2011. Introduction. Issues and debates on familyrelated migration and the family: A European perspective. S. 13–54 in: A. Kraler, E. Kofman, M. Kohli, C. Schmoll (Hg.): Gender, generations and the family in international migration. Amsterdam. Kok, J. 2010. Th e family factor in migration decisions. S. 215–250 in: J. Lucassen, L. Lucassen, P. Manning (Hg.): Migration history in world history. Multidisciplinary approaches. Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komter, A. E., Vollebergh, W. A. M. 2002. Solidarity in Dutch families. Family ties under strain? Journal of Family Issues 23: 171–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, M. 2013. Negotiating the social citizenship rights of migrant domestic workers: Th e right to family reunifi cation and a family life in policies and debates. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39: 409–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., Michalowski, I., Waibel, S. 2012. Citizenship rights for immigrants: National political processes and cross-national convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008. American Journal of Sociology 117: 1202–1245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraler, A. 2014. A liberal paradox: Expanding rights, reducing access? Contemporary patterns of family migration policies in the EU. S. 357–376 in: T. Geisen, T. Studer, E. Yildiz (Hg.): Migration, Familie und Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristen, C., Granato, N. 2004. Bildungsinvestitionen in Migrantenfamilie. S. 123–141 in: K. Bade, M. Bommes (Hg.): Migration – Integration – Bildung. IMIS-Beiträge Heft 23. Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., Milewski, N. 2007. Family change and migration in the life course: An introduction. Demographic Research 17: 567–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., Glick Schiller, N. 2007. Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social fi eld perspective on society. S. 181–218 in: A. Portes, J. DeWind (Hg.): Rethinking migration. New theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, P., Lamba-Nieves, D. 2011. Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liversage, A. 2013. Transnational families breaking up: Divorce among Turkish immigrants in Denmark. S. 145–160 in: K. Charsley (Hg.): Transnational marriage. New perspectives from Europe and beyond. New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthra, R. 2010. Intergenerational returns to migration? Comparing educational performance on both sides of the German border. ISER Working Paper 34. University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luthra, R. R., Waldinger, R. 2013. Intergenerational mobility. S. 169–205 in: D. Card, S. Raphael (Hg.): Immigration, poverty and socioeconomic mobility. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H. 2010. Gender in the migratory process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36: 1647–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H., Palenga-Möllenbeck, E. 2012. Care workers, care drain, and care chains: Refl ections on care, migration, and citizenship. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender State and Society 19: 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madianou, M., Miller, D. 2011. Mobile phone parenting: Reconfi guring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left -behind children. New Media and Society 13: 457–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., Taylor, J. E. 1993. Th eories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review 19: 431–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, M. 2005. „Gastarbeiterinnen“ in der Bundesrepublik. Anwerbepolitik, Migration und Geschlecht in den 50er bis 70er Jahren. Frankfurt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, V., Schans, D. 2011. Transnational families and the well-being of children: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Journal of Marriage and Family 73: 704–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N., Hamel, C. 2010. Union formation and partner choice in a transnational context: Th e case of descendants of Turkish immigrants in France. International Migration Review 44: 615–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N. 2007. First child of immigrant workers and their descendants in West Germany: Interrelation of events, disruption, or adaptation? Demographic Research 17: 859–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N. 2010. Immigrant fertility in West Germany: Is there a socialization eff ect in transitions to second and third births? European Journal of Population – Revue Européenne de Démographie 26: 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N. 2011. Transition to a fi rst birth among Turkish second-generation migrants in Western Europe. Advances in Life Course Research 16: 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N. 2013. Erwerbsbeteiligung und Einstellungen zur Familie von türkischen Migrantinnen im Generationenvergleich. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 25: 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milewski, N., Kulu, H. 2013. Mixed marriages in Germany: A high risk of divorce for immigrantnative couples. European Journal of Population – Revue Européenne de Démographie 30: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B. 1985. „Heimliches Matriarchat“ in Familien türkischer Arbeitsmigranten? Empirische Ergebnisse zu Veränderungen der Entscheidungsmacht und Aufgabenallokation. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 14: 450–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B. 1997. Sozialer Wandel, Migration und Familienbildung bei türkischen Frauen. S. 162–199 in: B. Nauck, U. Schönpfl ug (Hg.): Familien in verschiedenen Kulturen. Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B. 2000. Eltern-Kind-Beziehungen in Migrantenfamilien – Ein Vergleich zwischen griechischen, italienischen, türkischen und vietnamesischen Familien in Deutschland. S. 347–392 in: S. Familienbericht (Hg.): Familien ausländischer Herkunft in Deutschland: Empirische Beiträge zur Familienentwicklung und Akkulturation. Materialien zum 6. Familienbericht Bd. 1. Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B. 2002. Dreißig Jahre Migrantenfamilien in der Bundesrepublik. Familiärer Wandel zwischen Situationsanpassung, Akkulturation, Segregation und Remigration. S. 315–339 in: R. Nave-Herz (Hg.): Kontinuität und Wandel der Familie in Deutschland. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B. 2004. Familienbeziehungen und Sozialintegration von Migranten. Migration – Integration – Bildung. IMIS-Beiträge 23: 83–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B. 2011. Kulturelles und soziales Kapital als Determinante des Bildungserfolgs bei Migranten? S. 71–93 in: R. Becker (Hg.): Integration durch Bildung. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauck, B., Schönpfl ug, U. 1997. Familien in verschiedenen Kulturen. S. 1–21 in: B. Nauck, U. Schönpfl ug (Hg.): Familien in verschiedenen Kulturen. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nave-Herz, R. 2002. Family change and intergenerational relations in diff erent cultures. Würzburg. OECD 2013. International migration outlook 2013. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, B. S., Kagya, S. 2012. Fertility change among post –1989 immigrants to Israel from the former Soviet Union. International Migration Review 46: 792–827. Oswald, I. 2007. Migrationssoziologie. Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrenas, R. 2005. Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks 5: 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrenas, R. 2008. Transnational fathering: Gendered confl icts, distant disciplining and emotional gaps. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34: 1057–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalet, K., Schönpfl ug, U. 2001. Intergenerational transmission of collectivism and achievement values in two acculturation contexts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 32: 186–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, A. 2009. Idealisierung emotionaler Bindung oder materielle Versorgung? Transnationale Mutterschaft und Kettenmigration. S. 86–101 in: H. Lutz (Hg.): Gender Mobil? Geschlecht und Migration im transnationalen Raum. Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, L. 2005. Th e intergenerational social mobility of minority ethnic groups. Sociology 39: 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, L. 2007. Making education count: Th e eff ects of ethnicity and qualifi cations on intergenerational social class mobility. Th e Sociological Review 55: 485–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. 2003. Conclusion: Th eoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migration Review 37: 874–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., Rumbaut, R. G. 2001. Legacies. Th e story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., Rumbaut, R. G. 2006. Immigrant America. A portrait. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pries, L. 2010. Transnationalisierung. Th eorie und Empirie grenzüberschreitender Vergesellschaft ung. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, K. 2004. Immigrant families in the US. S. 253–269 in: J. Scott, J. Treas, M. Richards (Hg.): Th e blackwell companion to the sociology of families. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Z., Lichter, D. T. 2007. Social boundaries and marital assimilation: Interpreting trends in racial and ethnic intermarriage. American Sociological Review 72: 68–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabold, S., Diehl, C. 2003. Migration und familiale Konfl ikte. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 28: 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reniers, G. 2001. Th e post-migration survival of traditional marriage patterns: Consanguineous marriage among Turkish and Moroccan immigrants in Belgium. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 32: 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relikowski, I., Yilmaz, E., Blossfeld, H.-P. 2012. Wie lassen sich die hohen Bildungsaspirationen von Migranten erklären? Eine Mixed-Methods-Studie zur Rolle von strukturellen Aufstiegschancen und individueller Bildungserfahrung. S. 111–136 in: R. Becker, H. Solga (Hg.): Soziologische Bildungsforschung. Sonderheft 52 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaut, R. G. 2007. Ages, life stages, and generational cohorts: Decomposing the immigrant fi rst and second generations in the United States. S. 342–387 in: A. Portes, J. DeWind (Hg.): Rethinking migration. New theoretical and empirical perspectives. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schans, D. 2009. Transnational family ties of immigrants in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32: 1164–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, S., Kohls, M. 2009. Reproductive behaviour of migrant women in Germany: Data, patterns and determinants. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research: 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroedter, J. H. 2013. Ehemuster von Migranten in Westdeutschland. Analysen zur sozialen Integration auf Basis des Mikrozensus. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K., Stanfors, M. 2011. Th e transition to parenthood among the second generation: Evidence from Sweden, 1990–2005. Advances in Life Course Research 16: 190–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. 2001. Kinship, cultural preference and immigration: Consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis. Th e Journal of Royal Anthropological Institute 7: 315–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. 2004. Immigrant families in the UK. S. 270–285 in: J. Scott, J. Treas, M. Richards (Hg.): Th e blackwell companion to the sociology of families. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. 2006. Th e arranged transnational cousin marriages of British Pakistanis: Critique, dissent and cultural continuity. Contemporary South Asia 15: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M., Gans, D., Lowenstein, A., Giarrusso, R., Bengtson, V. L. 2010. Older parent-child relationships in six developed nations: Comparisons at the intersection of aff ection and confl ict. Journal of Marriage and Family 72: 1006–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, T. 2008. Th e rising importance of migrants for childbearing in Europe. Demographic Research 19: 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soehn, J. 2012. Rechtliche Stratifi kation: Der Einfl uss des Rechtsstatus auf Bildungsunterschiede zwischen Migrantengruppen. S. 164–185 in: R. Becker, H. Solga (Hg.): Soziologische Bildungsforschung. Sonderheft 52 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soehl, T., Yahirun, J. 2011. Timing of union formation and partner choice in immigrant societies: Th e United States and Germany. Advances in Life Course Research 16: 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soom Ammann, E., Van Holten, K. 2013. Getting old here and there: Opportunities and pitfalls of transnational care arrangements. Transnational Social Review – A Social Work Journal 3: 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach, A., Nauck, B. 2004. Intergenerationale Transmission von kulturellem Kapital in Migrantenfamilien. Zur Erklärung von ethnischen Unterschieden im deutschen Bildungssystem. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 7: 20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßburger, G. 2003. Heiratsverhalten und Partnerwahl im Einwanderungskontext. Eheschließungen der zweiten Migrantengeneration türkischer Herkunft. Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, E., Kraler, A., Bonjour, S., Bilger, V. 2009. Doing family: Responses to the constructions of ‘the migrant family’ across Europe. History of the Family 14: 165–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strik, T., De Hart, B., Nissen, E. 2012. Family reunifi cation: A barrier or facilitator of integration? A comparative study. Brussels, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardif-Williams, C. Y., Fisher, L. 2009. Clarifying the link between acculturation experiences and parent-child relationships among families in cultural transition: Th e promise of contemporary critiques of acculturation psychology. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 33: 150–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepecik, E. 2013. Bildungserfolg und migrantenspezifi sches Bildungskapital. S. 61–79 in: T. Geisen, T. Studer, E. Yildiz (Hg.): Migration, Familie und soziale Lage. Beiträge zu Bildung, Gender und Care. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, C. 2008. Migration in a ‘culture of migration’. Emirdag marrying into fl anders. European Review 16: 585–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., Marcum, C. S. 2011. Diversity and family relations in an aging society. S. 131–141 in: R. A. Settersen Jr., J. L. Angel (Hg.): Handbook of sociology of aging. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treibel, A. 2008. Migration. S. 295–317 in: N. Baur, H. Korte, M. Löw, M. Schroer (Hg.): Handbuch Soziologie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, N. E. 2011. Social construction of neglect: Th e case of unaccompanied minors from Morocco to Spain. S. 121–138 in: A. Kraler, E. Kofman, M. Kohli, C. Schmoll (Hg.): Gender, generations and the family in international migration. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, C., Sommer, E. 2013. Financial transfers between adult children and parents in migrant families from the former Soviet Union. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 44: 783–796. Weiss, H., Schnell, P., Ates, G. (Hg.) 2014. Zwischen den Generationen. Transmissionsprozesse in Familien mit Migrationshintergrund. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, M., Kämpfe, K. 2013. Family socialization, gender and educational success. S. 81–104 in: T. Geisen, T. Studer, E. Yildiz (Hg.): Migration, Familie und soziale Lage. Beiträge zu Bildung, Gender und Care. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, K. L. 2011. Determinants of fertility across context: A comparison of Mexican and Turkish immigrant women. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Available electronically from http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT –2011–05-2904 White, K., Buckley, C. J. 2011. Exposure to international migration and its eff ect on childbearing in Turkey. International Migration Review 45: 123–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. 2013. Transnational marriage migration and marriage migration: An overview. S. 23–37 in: K. Charsley (Hg.): Transnational marriage. New perspectives from Europe and beyond. New York, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilpert, C. 1980. Die Zukunft der Zweiten Generation. Erwartungen und Verhaltensmöglichkeiten ausländischer Kinder. Königstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., Schiller, N. G. 2003. Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology. International Migration Review 37: 576–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. 2008. Ethnische Grenzziehungen in der Immigrationsgesellschaft. Jenseits des Herder‘schen Commonsense. S. 57–80 in: F. Kalter (Hg.): Migration und Integration. Sonderheft 48 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, R., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, C. 2010. Old-age disability and wealth among return Mexican migrants from the United States. Journal of Aging and Health 22: 932–954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, M. 1997. Growing up American: Th e challenge confronting immigrant children and children of immigrants. Annual Review of Sociology 23: 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, R. Y. 2013. Transnational aging: Th e impacts of adult children’s immigration on their parents’ later lives. Transnational Social Review – A Social Work Journal 3: 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baykara-Krumme, H. (2015). Migrantenfamilien. In: Hill, P., Kopp, J. (eds) Handbuch Familiensoziologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02276-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02276-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02275-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02276-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics