Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Familie und Mobilität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Familiensoziologie

Abstract

Der Beitrag zeigt die enge Verflechtung von räumlicher Mobilität und familialen Entwicklungen auf. Dabei wird der Versuch unternommen, die vielfältigen und umfangreichen theoretischen und empirischen Befunde zur räumlichen Mobilität im Partnerschafts- und Familienkontext zueinander in Beziehung zu setzten und zu ordnen. Zunächst wird Umfang und Entwicklung der räumlichen Mobilität in Deutschland und im internationalen Vergleich dargestellt. Es folgt eine Diskussion theoretischer Ansätze, die bislang zur Erklärung der Determinanten und Konsequenzen unterschiedlicher Mobilitätsformen im Kontext von Partnerschaft und Familie verwendet wurden. Daran anknüpfend wird der aktuelle Stand der Forschung im Hinblick auf Mobilitätsform und familialem Lebensbereich zusammengefasst. Abschließend wird der weitere Forschungsbedarf im Zuge veränderter gesellschaftlicher Rahmenbedingungen aufgezeigt, die eine weiterhin zunehmende Bedeutung und Brisanz der Thematik nahelegen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abraham, M. 2006. Berufl iche Selbständigkeit. Die Folgen für Partnerschaft und Haushalt. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M., Auspurg, K., Bähr, S., Frodermann, C., Gundert, S., Hinz, T. 2013. Unemployment and willingness to accept job off ers: Results of a factorial survey experiment. Journal for Labour Market Research 46: 283–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M., Auspurg, K., Hinz, T. 2010. Migration Decisions Within Dual-Earner Partnerships: A Test of Bargaining Theory. Journal of Marriage and Family 72: 876–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M., Nisic, N. 2012. A simple mobility game for couples’ migration decisions and some quasi-experimental evidence. Rationality and Society 24: 168–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abraham, M., Schönholzer, T. 2009. Pendeln oder umziehen? Entscheidungen über unterschiedliche Mobilitätsformen in Paarhaushalten. S. 247–268 in: P. Kriwy, C. Gross (Hg.): Klein aber fein! Quantitative empirische Sozialforschung mit kleinen Fallzahlen. Wiesbade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, E. K., Chase-Lansdale, P. L. 2002. Home sweet home(s): Parental separations, residential moves, and adjustment problems in low-income adolescent girls. Developmental psychology 38: 792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astone, N. M., McLanahan, S. S. 1994. Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note. Demography 31: 575–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F. 1983. Supply-side sociology of the family: The challenge of the new home economics. Annual review of sociology 9: 375–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, W. T., Bielby, D. D. 1992. I will follow him: Family ties, gender-role beliefs, and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology 97: 1241–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birg, H., Flöthmann, E.-J. 1990. Regionsspezifi sche Wechselwirkungen zwischen Migration und Fertilität im Lebensverlauf. Acte Demographica 1: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M., Duncan, O. D. 1967. The American occupational structure. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blood, R. O., Wolfe, D. M. 1960. Husbands & wives: The dynamics of married living. Glencoe, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böheim, R., Taylor, M. P. 2002. Tied down or room to move? Investigating the relationships between housing tenure, employment status and residential mobility in Britain. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49: 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, H., Eichhorst, W., Florman, C., Okkels H., Mette O., Skiöld, L. 2008. Geographic mobility in the European Union. Optimising its economic and social benefi ts. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, E., Collet, B., Dargus, C., Maurines, B., Orain, R. 2008. France-job mobility bridges regions in a centralized country. S. 65–103 in: N. F. Schneider, G. Meil (Hg.): Mobile living across Europe I. Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European countries. Opladen, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, N., Love, J. 1991. Gender and migration: Geographical mobility and the wife’s sacrifi ce. The Sociological Review 39: 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P., Cooke, T., Halfacree, K., Smith, D. 2003. The eff ect of long-distance family migration and motherhood on partnered women’s labour-market activity rates in Great Britain and the USA. Environment and Planning A 35: 2097–2114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P. J., Kulu, H., Cooke, T., Gayle, V., Mulder, C. H. (2008): Moving and union dissolution. Demography 45: 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, W. K., Zick, C. D. 1994. The economics of housespousery: An essay on household work. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 15: 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A. 1986. Human migration. Scientifi c geography series Band 7. Beverly Hills, California. Clark, W. A., Huang, Y., Withers, S. 2003. Does commuting distance matter? Commuting tolerance and residential change. Regional Science and Urban Economics 33: 199–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A., Withers, S. D. 2002. Disentangling the interaction of migration, mobility, and laborforce participation. Environment and Planning A 34: 923–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A., Withers, S. D. 2009. Fertility, mobility and labour‐force participation: A study of synchronicity. Population, Space and Place 15: 305–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. A., Withers, S. D. 2007. Family migration and mobility sequences in the United States: Spatial mobility in the context of the life course. Demographic Research 17: 591–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, J., Pollak, R. A. 2007. Why are power couples increasingly concentrated in large metropolitan areas? Journal of Labor Economics 25: 475–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T. J. 2008. Migration in a family way. Population, Space and Place 14: 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T. J. 2013. Internal migration in decline. The Professional Geographer 65: 664–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T. J., Bailey, A. J. 1996. Family migration and the employment of married women and men. Economic Geography 72: 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. 1989. Family formation and urbanization. Population: An English Selection 44: 123–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, R. 2007. Is there a quiet revolution in women’s travel? Revisiting the gender gap in commuting. Journal of the American Planning Association 73: 298–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo, J. 1976. Why families move. A model of the geographic mobility of married couples. Santa Monica, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo, J. 1978. Does unemployment aff ect migration? Evidence from micro data. The Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 504–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deding, M., Filges, T., Van Ommeren, J. 2009. Spatial mobility and commuting: The case of twoearner households. Journal of Regional Science 49: 113–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, G. F., Graefe, D. R. 2008. Family life course transitions and the economic consequences of internal migration. Population, Space and Place 14: 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMeester, E., Mulder, C. H., Fortuijn, J. D. 2007. Time spent in paid work by women and men in urban and less urban contexts in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografi e 98: 585–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorbritz, J., Naderi, R. 2012. Stability of bilocal relationships – Conditions and development paths. An analysis of the fi rst and second wave of pairfam. Comparative Population Studies – Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 37: 393–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, P., Perrucci, C. C. 1976. Dual occupation families and migration. American Sociological Review 41: 252–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, K., Lindgren, U., Westerlund, O. 2003. Geographical labour mobility: Migration or commuting? Regional Studies 37: 827–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feijten, P., Mulder, C. H. 2002. The timing of household events and housing events in the Netherlands: A longitudinal perspective. Housing Studies 17: 773–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. M., Su, C. 2004. Space in the study of labor markets. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 545–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, J., DeLuca, S., Estacion, A. 2010. Coming and going: Explaining the eff ects of residential and school mobility on adolescent delinquency. Social Science Research 39: 459–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist, C., McManus, P. A. 2008. Geographical mobility over the life course: Motivations and implications. Population, Space and Place 14: 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granato, N., Niebuhr, A. 2009. Verluste in Ostdeutschland gehen zurück. Arbeitskräft ewanderungen nach Qualifi kation. IAB-Kurzbericht 7: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. E., Hogarth, T., Shackleton, R. E. 1999. Longer distance commuting as a substitute for migration in Britain. A review of trends, issues and implications. International Journal of Population Geography 5: 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. J., Mueser, P. R., Plane, D. A., Schlottmann, A. M. 1991. New directions in migration research. The Annals of Regional Science 25: 237–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, H. E. 1980. Dual-career couples who live apart: Two types. Journal of Marriage and Family 42: 567–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, A., Hamann, S. 2008. Pendeln †’ ein zunehmender Trend, vor allem bei Hochqualifi zierten: Ost-West-Vergleich. IAB-Kurzbericht 6: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, S., Pratt, G. 1988: Reconceptualizing the links between home and work in urban geography. Economic Geography 64 (4), S. 299–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huinink, J., Brüderl, J., Nauck B., Walper, S., Castiglioni, L., Feldhaus, M. 2011. Panel analysis of intimate relationships and family dynamics (pairfam): Conceptual framework and design. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 23: 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huinink, J., Feldhaus, M. 2012. Fertility and commuting behaviour in Germany. Comparative Population Studies – Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 37: 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huinink, J., Schröder, T. 2008. Skizzen zu einer Theorie des Lebenslaufs. S. 291–307 in: A. Diekmann, K. Eichner, P. Schmidt, T. Voss, K.-D. Opp (Hg.): Rational Choice: Theoretische Analysen und empirische Resultate: Festschrift für Karl-Dieter Opp zum 70. Geburtstag. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huinink, J., Wagner, M. 1989. Regionale Lebensbedingungen, Migration und Familienbildung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 41: 669–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. C., Kau, J. B. 1985. Migration and wage growth: A human capital approach. Southern Economic Journal 51: 697–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. 2000. Why do People Still Live in East Germany? DIW Discussion Paper No. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. 2006. Staunching emigration from East Germany: Age and the determinants of migration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of the European Economic Association 4: 1014–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynen, P., Montulet, B., Hubert, M., Lück, D., Orain R. 2008. Survey designs and methods. S. 47–63 in: N. F. Schneider, G. Meil (Hg.): Mobile living across Europe I. Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European countries. Opladen, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, G. M., Scamman, J. P., Eckerling, W. D. 1989. Geographic mobility and student achievement in an urban Setting. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11: 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, J. P., Levin, L. M. 1997. Marriage and migration: Comparing gains and losses from migration for couples and singles. Social Science Quarterly 78: 688–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, J. P., Levin, L. M. 2000. The eff ects of internal migration on the relative economic status of women and men. The Journal of Socio-Economics 29: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiak, A., Wasmer, E. 2008. Mobility in Europe. Why it is low, the bottlenecks, and the policy solutions. Directorate-General Economic and Financial Aff airs, European Commission. European Economy – Economic Papers 340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston-Anumonwo, I. 1992. The infl uence of household type on gender diff erences in work trip distance. The Professional Geographer 44: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jürges, H. 2006. Gender ideology, division of housework, and the geographic mobility of families. Review of Economics of the Household 4: 299–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalter, F. 1994. Pendeln statt Migration? Die Wahl und Stabilität von Wohnort Arbeitsortkombinationen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23: 460–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalter, F. 1998. Partnerschaft und Migration. Zur theoretischen Erklärung eines empirischen Eff ekts. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 50: 283–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, L. 2003. Family gentrifi ers: Challenging the city as a place simultaneously to build a career and to raise children. Urban Studies 40: 2573–2584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kley, S. 2011. Explaining the stages of migration within a life-course framework. European Sociological Review 47: 469–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kley, S. 2012. Gefährdet Pendelmobilität die Stabilität von Paarbeziehungen? Einfl üsse von Erwerbskonstellationen und Haushaltsarrangements in Ost- und Westdeutschland auf die Trennungswahrscheinlichkeit von Paaren. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41: 356–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kley, S., Mulder, C. H. 2010. Considering, planning, and realizing migration in early adulthood.

    Google Scholar 

  • The infl uence of life-course events and perceived opportunities on leaving the city in Germany. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 25: 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klis, M., Mulder, C. H. 2008. Beyond the trailing spouse: The commuter partnership as an alternative to family migration. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 23: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, M. 1978. Soziologie des Lebenslaufs. Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H. 2005. Migration and fertility: Competing hypotheses re-examined. European Journal of Population – Revue Européenne de Démographie 21: 51–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H. 2006. Fertility of internal migrants: Comparison between Austria and Poland. Population, Space and Place 12: 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H. 2008. Fertility and spatial mobility in the life course: Evidence from Austria. Environment and planning A 40: 632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., Boyle, P., Andersson, G. 2009. High suburban fertility: Evidence from four Northern European countries. Demographic Research 21: 915–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., Boyle, P. J. 2009. High fertility in city suburbs: Compositional or contextual eff ects? European Journal of Population – Revue Européenne de Démographie 25: 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., Milewski, N. 2007. Family change and migration in the life course: An introduction. Demographic Research 17: 567–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., Vikat, A. 2007. Fertility diff erences by housing type: The eff ect of housing conditions or of selective moves? Demographic Research 17: 775–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., Vikat, A., Andersson, G. 2007. Settlement size and fertility in the Nordic countries. Population Studies 61: 265–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, M.-P. 1999. Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of non-employment activities. Economic Geography 75: 370–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, J. B., Morgan, J. N. 1967. The eff ect of geographical mobility on income. The Journal of Human Resources 2: 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauterbach, W., Pillemer, K. 2001. Social structure and the family. A United States-Germany comparison of residential proximity between parents and adult children. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 13: 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClere, F. B., McLaughlin, D. K. 1997. Family migration and changes in women’s earnings: A decomposition analysis. Population Research and Policy Review 16: 315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S. 1966. A theory of migration. Demography 3: 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T. 1982. The migration of dual-worker families: Does the wife’s job matter? Social Science Quarterly 63: 48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T. 1983. Socioeconomic returns to migration among married women. Social Forces 62: 487–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limmer, R., Schneider, N. F. 2008. Studying job-related spatial mobility in Europe. S. 13–45 in: N. F. Schneider, G. Meil (Hg.): Mobile living across Europe I. Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European Countries. Opladen, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, L. H. 1974. Women’s labor force participation and the residential mobility of families. Social Forces 52: 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. A. 2003. Effi ciency in marriage. Review of Economics of the Household 1: 153–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, J. F., Chen Chiu, L.-i. 1990. The wage eff ects of residential location and commuting constraints on employed married women. Urban Studies 27: 353–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manser, M., Brown, M. 1980. Marriage and household decision-making. A bargaining analysis. The Economics of the Family 21: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, W. T., Pleck, J. H. 1986. Sex and willingness to move for occupational advancement: Some national sample results. Sociological Quarterly 27: 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, N. L. 1988. Economic returns to migration: Marital status and gender diff erences. Social Science Quarterly 69: 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meil, G. 2010. Job mobility and family life. S. 216–235 in: N. F. Schneider, B. Collet (Hg.): Mobile living across Europe II. Causes and consequences of job-related spatial mobility in crossnational comparison. Opladen, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meil, G., Ayuso, L., Mahia R. 2008. Spain-recurring mobility rather than relocation. S. 149–187 in: N. F. Schneider, G. Meil (Hg.): Mobile living across Europe I. Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European Countries. Opladen, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. 1978. Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy 86: 749–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., Wozniak, A. 2011. Internal migration in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25: 173–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. R., Lichter, D. T. 1988. Family migration and female employment: The problem of underemployment among migrant married women. Journal of Marriage and Family 50: 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C. H. 1993. Migration dynamics: A life course approach. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C. H., Malmberg, G. 2011. Moving related to separation: Who moves and to what distance. Environment and Planning A 43: 2589–2607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C. H., Wagner, M. 2012. Moving aft er separation: The role of location-specifi c capital. Housing Studies 27: 839–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C. H., Wagner, M. 2001. The connections between family formation and fi rst-time home ownership in the context of West Germany and the Netherlands. European Journal of Population – Revue Européenne de Démographie 17: 137–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisic, N. 2009. Determinanten und Konsequenzen berufl ich bedingter regionaler Mobilität im Kontext von Partnerschaft und Haushalt. Erlangen: Universitätsbibliothek der Universität Erlangen- Nürnberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisic, N. 2010. Mitgegangen – mitgefangen? Die Folgen von Haushaltsumzügen für die Einkommenssituation von Frauen in Partnerschaft en. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 62: 515–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisic, N., Melzer, S. M. 2013. Unerwartete Verlierer? Überraschende Gewinner? Berufl ich bedingte Umzüge ost- und westdeutscher Paare. GENDER: Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft Sonderheft 2 „Paare und Ungleichheiten“: 120–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, N. 1992. Intrafamily bargaining and household decisions. Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, N. 1998. Der familienökonomische Ansatz von Gary S. Becker. S. 63–90 in: I. Pies, M. Leschke (Hg.): Gary Beckers ökonomischer Imperialismus. Konzepte der Gesellschaft stheorie. Band 4. Tübingen. Polachek, S., Horvath, F. 1977. A life cycle approach to migration. S. 103–149 in: R. G. Ehrenberg (Hg.): Research in labor economics. An annual compilation of research. Greenwich, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, G., Hanson, S. 1991. Time, space, and the occupational segregation of women: A critique of human capital theory. Special Issue Changing Gender Relations in Urban Space 22: 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe, B. 2011. Dual-earner migration. Earnings gains, employment and self-selection. Journal of Population Economics 24: 477–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapino, M. A., Cooke, T. J. 2011. Commuting, gender roles, and entrapment: A national study utilizing spatial fi xed eff ects and control groups. Professional Geographer 63: 277–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuschke, D. 2010a. Berufsbedingtes Pendeln zwischen zwei Wohnsitzen. Merkmale einer multilokalen Lebensform in der Spätmoderne. Comparative Population Studies: CPoS 35: 135–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuschke, Darja (2010b): Multilokales Wohnen. Raum-zeitliche Muster multilokaler Wohnarrangements von Shuttles und Personen in einer Fernbeziehung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaft en

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüger, H., Feldhaus, M., Becker, K. S., Schlegel, M. 2011. Zirkuläre Mobilität in Deutschland: Vergleichende Analysen mit zwei repräsentativen Surveys zu Formen, Verbreitung und Relevanz im Kontext der Partnerschaft s- und Familienentwicklung. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 36: 193–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupert, P., Wasmer, E. 2009. Housing and the labor market: Time to move and aggregate unemployment. Departmental Working Papers, Department of Economics. Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell, S. H. 1977. Women and the economics of family migration. The Review of Economics and Statistics 59: 406–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schier, M. 2009. Räumliche Entgrenzung von Arbeit und Familie. Die Herstellung von Familie unter Bedingungen von Multilokalität. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, N. F., Limmer, R., Ruckdeschel, K. 2002. Mobil, fl exibel, gebunden. Familie und Beruf in der mobilen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, N. F., Meil, G. (Hg.) 2008. Mobile living across Europe I. Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European countries. Opladen, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, N. F., Ruppenthal, S., Lück, D., Rüger, H., Dauber, A. 2008. Germany – A country of locally attached but highly mobile people. S. 105–147 in: N. F. Schneider, G. Meil (Hg.): Mobile living across Europe I. Relevance and diversity of job-related spatial mobility in six European countries. Opladen, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. 1998. Der fl exible Mensch. Die Kultur des neuen Kapitalismus. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, M. P., Shields, G. M. 1993. A theoretical and empirical analysis of family migration and household production: U. S. 1980–1985. Southern Economic Journal 59: 768–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shihadeh, E. S. 1991. The prevalence of husband-centered migration: Employment consequences for married mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family 53: 432–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W. 1987. Workplace location, residential location, and urban commuting. Urban Studies 24: 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singell, L. D., Lillydahl, J. H. 1986. An empirical analysis of the commute to work patterns of males and females in two-earner households. Urban Studies 23: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjaastad, L. A. 1962. The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy 70: 80–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, J., Mulder, C. H., Hooimeijer, P. 2003. Changing gender roles, shift ing power balance and long-distance migration of couples. Urban Studies 40: 603–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, J., Mulder, C. H., Hooimeijer, P. 2004. Migration of couples with non‐employed and employed wives in the Netherlands: The changing eff ects of the partners’ characteristics. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30: 283–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitze, G. 1984. The eff ect of family migration on wives’ employment: How long does it last? Social Science Quarterly 65: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitze, G. 1986.Family migration largely unresponsive to wife’s employment (across age groups). Sociology and Social Research 70: 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt 2005. Leben und Arbeiten in Deutschland. Mikrozensus 2004. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt 2013. Datenreport 2013. Ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohmeier, K. P. 1989. “Movers” und “Stayers” – Räumliche Mobilität und Familienentwicklung. S. 165–187 in: A. Herlth, K. P. Strohmeier (Hg.): Lebenslauf und Familienentwicklung. Opladen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, G., Weiske, C. 2009. Multilokales Wohnen – Einführung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, T., Niemeier, D. 1997. Travel to work and household responsibility: New evidence. Transportation 24: 397–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities, Cambridge, Malden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbrande, T. (Hg.) 2006. Mobility in Europe. Analysis of the 2005 Eurobarometer Survey on Geographical and Labour Market Mobility. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M. 1989. Räumliche Mobilität im Lebensverlauf: Eine empirische Untersuchung sozialer Bedingungen der Migration. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. A., Longino, C. F. 2005. Our “increasingly mobile society”? The curious persistence of a false belief. The gerontologist: A Journal of the Gerontological Society of America 45: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaiceva, A. 2010. East-West migration and gender: Is there a diff erential eff ect for migrant women? Labour Economics 17: 443–454.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Natascha Nisic

  2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Deutschland

    Martin Abraham

Authors
  1. Natascha Nisic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. RWTH Aachen, Germany

    Paul B. Hill

  2. Universität Trier, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany

    Johannes Kopp

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nisic, N., Abraham, M. (2015). Familie und Mobilität. In: Hill, P., Kopp, J. (eds) Handbuch Familiensoziologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02276-1_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02276-1_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-02275-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-02276-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation