An Evaluation of a Recently Developed Elastoplastic Constitutive Model by General FEM Code ADINA

  • Z. Xia
  • F. Ellyin
  • G. Meijer
Conference paper

Abstract

In most general purpose finite element programs, the rate-independent elastoplastic constitutive relations use the classical isotropic and kinematic hardening models, or some modification of them through mostly ad hoc rules. Numerous experimental observations indicate that materials can have very complex behaviour, and the classical inelastic models are quite inadequate for simulating these responses. A hierarchy of plastic constitutive models which includes rate-independent, rate-dependent and finite deformation models have been recently developed by Ellyin and Xia [1–3]. As a further step towards practical application, the rate-independent model has been developed into a package for a user defined material model. For example, it has been implemented in the ADINA code user defined material model for the two- and three-dimensional elements. The performance and validation of the model is verified by numerous examples involving different types of loading paths and histories. The results are compared with the experimental data. It is clearly shown that this model is far superior to those currently available, yet it is relatively simple to implement.

Keywords

Fatigue Meijer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Ellyin and Z. Xia, “A Rate-Dependent Inelastic Constitutive Model, Part I: Elastic-Plastic Flow”, ASME J. Engng. Mat. Tech. Vol. 113, 1991, pp. 314–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xia, Z. and Ellyin, F., “A Finite Elastoplastic Constitutive Formulation with New Co-Rotational Stress-Rate and Strain Hardening Rule”, ASME J. Applied Mechanics, (in press).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. Ellyin, Z. Xia and J. Wu, “A New Elastoplastic Constitutive Model Inserted into the User-Supplied Material Model of ADINA”, Computers and Structures, (in press).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Phillips, “A Review of Quasistatic Experimental Plasticity and Viscoplasticity”, Int J. Plasticity, Vol. 2, 1986, pp. 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Ellyin and D. Kujawski, “Plastic Strain Energy in Fatigue Failure”, ASME J. Pressure Vessel and Technology, Vol. 106, 1984, pp. 324–347.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.S. Lamba and O.M. Sidebottom, “Cyclic Plasticity for Non-proportional Paths”, Parts 1 & 2, ASME J. Engng. Mat. Tech., Vol. 100, 1978, pp. 96–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Jian and H. Sehitoglu, “Cyclic Ratcheting of 1070 Steel under Multiaxial Stress States”, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol. 10, 1994, pp. 579–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Jian and H. Sehitoglu, “Multiaxial Cyclic Ratcheting under Multiple Step Loading”, Int. J. Plasticity, Vol. 10, 1994, pp. 849–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Xia
    • 1
  • F. Ellyin
    • 1
  • G. Meijer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations