Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Disaster Medicine ((DISASTER,volume 1))

  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Following a sociological approach, it is necessary to differentiate between two aspects of “disaster”. Disaster is a very accelerated and radical type of social change; and, in a sociologic dimension of secularization (2), I call its two social extremes “loss” (Ger. Schaden) and “catastrophe”. May I just give a draft of the two ways disaster may work:

  1. 1)

    it may cause loss, which is an anticipated and even predictable social change; it is embedded in well-known life circumstances (social processes), and, if such incur, it is recognized by means of socialized patterns; to suffer means “defeat”;

  2. 2)

    whereas catastrophe is an uncanny and sudden event; in the middle of well-known social processes, it takes one unawares; it is overwhelming and changes “everything”; to suffer means to be slain by the Unknowable (3, 6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brown, W.M.: Recovery from a nuclear attack. Springfield (Va.): National Technical Information Service 1971

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clausen, L.: Tausch. München: Kösel 1978

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clausen, L., Jäger, W.: Zur soziologischen Katastrophenanalyse. Zivilverteidigung 6, 20-25 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eddy, P., Potter, E., Page, B.: Destination disaster. London: Hart-Davis, Mac Gibbon 1976

    Google Scholar 

  5. Katz, J., Capron, A.M.: Catastrophic deseases. New York: Rtissell Sage Foundations 1975

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jäger, W.: Katastrophe und Gesellschaft. Darmstadt, Neuwied: Luchterhand 1977

    Google Scholar 

  7. Der Landkreis No. 8/9 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Menke-Gluckert, P.: Thesen zur Zivilen Verteidigung. Zivilverteidigung 8, (3) 5 – 7 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moore, H.E.: Toward a theory of disaster. Am. Sociol. Rev. 21, 733 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schultz, D.P.: Group behavior in a simulated panic situation. Charlotte (N.C.): North Carolina University 1971

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wenger, D.E., Parr, A.R.: Community functions under disaster conditions. Columbus (Ohio): Ohio State University 1969

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Clausen, L. (1980). The Rise of Catastrophes. In: Frey, R., Safar, P. (eds) Types and Events of Disasters Organization in Various Disaster Situations. Disaster Medicine, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67093-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67093-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-09043-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-67093-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics