Skip to main content

Instructional Model Oriented Towards Improving Teaching Ability of Preservice Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Learning & Teaching in Higher Education

Part of the book series: New Frontiers of Educational Research ((NFER))

Abstract

This study is aimed at solving the long-standing problem of the teacher-centered teaching model in Chinese universities. To change the situation from dull, inefficient theory learning, to promoting students’ knowledge building, fostering ways of thinking in teaching career with a creative new teaching model, and improving preservice teachers’ teaching ability. Transformative learning theory is the theoretical basis of this study. The teaching model includes interactive lecturing, educational narratives, instructional simulation, reading reports, video presentation, self-reflection project “200”, net-based learning resources, and assessments.

A study of the course, “Fundamental Theories of Learning and Teaching” in Beijing Normal University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Television show refers to the teaching style of some teachers lacking interaction with the students, which is like watching television.

  2. 2.

    The style of herding sheep, refers to the teaching style of leaving students alone, without supervising or facilitating.

  3. 3.

    All assessing forms are from the network of administrative management system of the Office of Educational Administration, Beijing Normal University, and with the permission from the office.

References

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, N. (1997). Introduction to education: humanity, democracy and education. Taibei: Xinli Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1991). The later works 1925–1953, Vol. 17 (1885–1953, Essays). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press (Boydston, J. A. Ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M. (1965). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, W., & Xu, W. (2010). On value of teaching metaphor. Jiangsu Education Research, 1, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, X. (2003). Implicit learning. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41, 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mckeachie, W. J. (2002). Teaching tips (11th ed., p. 70). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1978). Education for perspective transformation: Women’s re-entry programs in community colleges. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1985). A critical theory of self-directed learning. In S. Brookfield (Ed.), Self-directed learning: from theory to practice (new directions for continuing education, 25). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2006). An overview of transformative learning. In P. Sutherland & J. Crowther (Eds.), Lifelong learning: Concepts and contexts (pp. 24–38). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K. (2002) Malcolm Knowles, informal adult education, self-direction and andragogy, The Encyclopedia of Informal Education, http://www.infed.org/thinkers/et-knowl.htm.

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Successful intelligence. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toshio, O. (1998). Computer network and future school. Tokyo: Hitotsubashi-Shuppan Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, B. (2008). Speak to win: how to present with power in any situation. New York: AMACOM Division of American Management Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2007). Chuanxilu. Beijing: Lantian Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. J. (2004). Problem-based learning: Exploiting knowledge of how people learn to promote effective learning. BEE-j Vol. 3. http://bio.ltsn.ac.uk/journal/vol3/beej-3-5.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mang Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: Students’ Assessing Form for the Course “Fundamental Theories of Learning and Teaching” (Academic Year 2012–2013)

Students’ major

Educational technology

Grade

2010

Type of course

Compulsory

Number of participants

42

Teacher’s name

Mang Li

Teacher’s title

Professor

Work unit

Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University

Assessment items

Detailed items

Percentage of each item

Final score

Average of the university

Excellent

Good

Average

Below average

Poor

General assessment

Your general assessment of the teacher’s teaching

95.2

4.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.95

4.62

Your general assessment of the course

85.7

11.9

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.83

4.57

Assessment of teacher’s teaching quality

The teacher works earnestly and responsibly

85.7

11.9

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.83

4.65

The teacher teaches clearly

90.5

7.1

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.88

4.54

The teacher uses effective teaching methods

88.1

9.5

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.86

4.51

The teacher teaches with key points and difficult points stand out

78.6

14.3

7.1

0.0

0.0

4.71

4.48

The teacher attaches importance to teaching method

83.3

14.3

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.81

4.48

The teacher attaches importance to communication with students

92.9

7.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.93

4.48

The teacher teaches with his/her own style

88.1

11.9

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.88

4.58

The teacher’s character and morals have a positive influence on you

85.7

14.3

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.86

4.44

The teacher can stimulate your learning motivation

76.2

23.8

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.76

4.37

The teacher’s teaching increased your interest in this course

78.6

19.0

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.76

4.35

The teacher’s teaching increased your ability

71.4

26.2

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.69

4.39

Assessment of the course

This course has enough class hours

61.9

28.6

9.5

0.0

0.0

4.52

4.40

This course has appropriate content difficulty

71.4

21.4

7.1

0.0

0.0

4.64

4.38

This course has appropriate content coverage

73.8

21.4

4.8

0.0

0.0

4.69

4.41

This course has appropriate learning load for students

71.4

23.8

4.8

0.0

0.0

4.67

4.35

This course is important to you

73.8

23.8

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.71

4.42

This course has appropriate textbook or reference books

50.0

38.1

11.9

0.0

0.0

4.38

4.27

This course has tightly connected teaching steps

64.3

33.3

2.4

0.0

0.0

4.62

4.39

This course connects with formerly taken courses

52.4

38.1

9.5

0.0

0.0

4.43

4.26

Appendix B: Students’ Assessing Form for the Course “Fundamental Theories of Learning and Teaching” (Academic Year 2011–2012)

Students’ major

Educational technology

Grade

2009

Type of the course

Compulsory

Number of participants

54

Teacher’s name

Mang Le

Teacher’s title

Professor

Work unit

Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University

Assessment items

Detailed items

Percentage of each item

Final Score

Average of the university

Excellent

Good

Average

Below average

Poor

General assessment

Your general assessment of the teacher’s teaching

85.2

13.0

0.0

1.9

0.0

4.81

4.57

Your general assessment of the course

83.3

14.8

0.0

1.9

0.0

4.80

4.52

Assessment of teacher’s teaching quality

The teacher works earnestly and responsibly

88.9

9.3

1.9

0.0

0.0

4.87

4.60

The teacher teaches clearly

83.3

14.8

1.9

0.0

0.0

4.81

4.50

The teacher uses effective teaching methods

79.6

18.5

1.9

0.0

0.0

4.78

4.47

The teacher teaches with key points and difficult points stand out

70.4

22.2

7.4

0.0

0.0

4.63

4.43

The teacher attaches importance to teaching method

74.1

22.2

3.7

0.0

0.0

4.70

4.43

The teacher attaches importance to communication with students

83.6

12.7

3.6

0.0

0.0

4.80

4.42

The teacher teaches with his/her own style

85.5

12.7

1.8

0.0

0.0

4.84

4.52

The teacher’s character and morals have a positive influence on you

74.5

16.4

9.1

0.0

0.0

4.65

4.39

The teacher can stimulate your learning motivation

65.5

27.3

5.5

1.8

0.0

4.56

4.32

The teacher’s teaching increased your interest in this course

69.1

20.0

9.1

1.8

0.0

4.56

4.30

The teacher’s teaching increased your ability

61.8

30.9

7.3

0.0

0.0

4.55

4.34

Assessment of the course

This course has enough class hours

54.5

40.0

3.6

1.8

0.0

4.47

4.34

This course has appropriate content difficulty

61.8

36.4

1.8

0.0

0.0

4.60

4.33

This course has appropriate content coverage

63.6

30.9

3.6

1.8

0.0

4.56

4.36

This course has appropriate learning load for students

49.1

43.6

5.5

1.8

0.0

4.40

4.31

This course is important to you

74.5

23.6

1.8

0.0

0.0

4.73

4.38

This course has appropriate textbook or reference books

29.1

54.5

14.5

1.8

0.0

4.11

4.21

This course has tightly connected teaching steps

63.6

36.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.64

4.33

This course connects with formerly taken courses

41.8

56.4

1.8

0.0

0.0

4.40

4.22

Appendix C: Students’ Assessing Form for the Course “Fundamental Theories of Learning and Teaching” (Academic Year 2010–2011)

Students’ major

Educational technology

Grade

2008

Type of the course

Compulsory

Number of participants

44

Teacher’s name

Mang Le

Teacher’s title

Professor

Work unit

Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University

Assessment items

Detailed items

Percentage of each item

Final Score

Average of the university

Excellent

Good

Average

Below average

Poor

General assessment

Your general assessment of the teacher’s teaching

86.4

11.4

2.3

0.0

0.0

4.84

4.56

Your general assessment of the course

79.5

11.4

9.1

0.0

0.0

4.70

4.51

Assessment of teacher’s teaching quality

The teacher works earnestly and responsibly

75.0

22.7

2.3

0.0

0.0

4.73

4.59

The teacher teaches clearly

79.5

15.9

4.5

0.0

0.0

4.75

4.48

The teacher uses effective teaching methods

79.5

13.6

6.8

0.0

0.0

4.73

4.45

The teacher teaches with key points and difficult points stand out

70.5

25.0

4.5

0.0

0.0

4.66

4.42

The teacher attaches importance to teaching method

79.5

13.6

6.8

0.0

0.0

4.73

4.41

The teacher attaches importance to communication with students

79.5

15.9

4.5

0.0

0.0

4.75

4.40

The teacher teaches with his/her own style

84.1

13.6

2.3

0.0

0.0

4.82

4.52

The teacher’s character and morals have a positive influence on you

79.5

20.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.80

4.37

The teacher can stimulate your learning motivation

75.0

25.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

4.75

4.30

The teacher’s teaching increased your interest in this course

63.6

34.1

2.3

0.0

0.0

4.61

4.29

The teacher’s teaching increased your ability

79.5

15.9

4.5

0.0

0.0

4.75

4.33

Assessment of the course

This course has enough class hours

65.9

27.3

6.8

0.0

0.0

4.59

4.33

This course has appropriate content difficulty

59.1

27.3

13.6

0.0

0.0

4.45

4.31

This course has appropriate content coverage

59.1

34.1

6.8

0.0

0.0

4.52

4.34

This course has appropriate learning load for students

52.3

38.6

6.8

2.3

0.0

4.41

4.30

This course is important to you

70.5

20.5

9.1

0.0

0.0

4.61

4.39

This course has appropriate textbook or reference books

50.0

27.3

18.2

4.5

0.0

4.23

4.21

This course has tightly connected teaching steps

63.6

29.5

6.8

0.0

0.0

4.57

4.33

This course connects with formerly taken courses

52.3

34.1

13.6

0.0

0.0

4.39

4.23

Appendix D: Students’ Detailed Comments on the Course Fundamental Theories of Learning and Teaching

Number

Item

Opinions and suggestions

1

What are the outstanding advantages of the teacher’s teaching in your opinion?

Various forms, has his own focus

2

 

Communicates a lot with students, has his own original thought

3

 

Many advantages, learned, kind

4

 

The teacher gives genuine presentations, using vivid examples from daily life

5

 

Dignified, sincere, doesn’t exaggerate, great ideas put in writing, humorous and thoughtful, good grounding

6

 

Genial, humorous, insightful, shares with student thoughts and world view

7

 

Gives students opportunity to realize their potentials, combines learning and teaching

8

 

Genial, thoughtful

9

 

Focus on learning and teaching

10

 

Natural and various forms

11

 

Practical and vivid

12

 

Humorous and approachable

13

 

Has original thoughts

14

 

Unifies knowing and doing, imparts knowledge and educates people. Learn to educate, behave to civilize

15

 

The teacher is responsible and humorous

16

 

Knowledgeable

17

 

Humorous and profound

18

 

Well documented in class, the teacher is genial. I like it

19

 

Genial, rigorous, having personality charm, always providing constructive suggestions

20

 

Clear and humorous language use

21

 

Responsible, teaches carefully, reasonable teaching arrangement

22

 

Knowledgeable, high academic literacy, clear in-class presentation, various activities, comments to the point

23

 

Wide range of knowledge, genial, clear lectures, air of a master, original thought

24

 

Careful

25

 

Humorous and responsible

26

 

Careful, responsible, and kind

27

 

Careful, responsible, having original way of teaching, emphasizes communication with students, enriched teaching content, practical

28

 

Good lectures

29

 

Original thought

30

 

The teacher is humorous, has got original thought on many issues, and willing to share with students. Special way of teaching, very interesting

31

 

Interaction

32

 

Humorous lectures, understandable, concerning various aspects, guiding us in thinking. Makes good use of resources, much interaction, communication, and guidance

33

 

Interesting lectures, in-depth knowledge.

34

 

Pithy and original thought, good at inspiring students, various teaching methods

35

 

Vivid and detailed explanation, thoughtful

36

 

Humorous lectures, careful and responsible

37

 

Good at communicating with students, original way of teaching, good at inspiring students, concerned with fostering thinking abilities

38

 

Charming personality, clear lectures, excellent teaching

39

 

Careful teaching, responsible, genial. I like listening to this teacher

40

 

Good lectures.

41

What is your largest gain in this course?

Gain knowledge about learning and teaching, get to know about this field

42

 

Get to know basic qualities of teachers, and issues to consider as a teacher in the future

43

 

Attitude and opinion toward teachers changed

44

 

Learning and teaching, important issue, much to learn

45

 

Learned personal charm from the teacher, and experienced the pleasure of learning by doing

46

 

Gained much knowledge about learning and teaching, learnt to think, learnt to find learning and teaching in daily life, became interested

47

 

Group cooperation

48

 

Gained own understanding on how to learn and teach, experienced being a teacher through micro-teaching activity

49

 

Learned learning and teaching theories, got new ideas about instruction, experienced teaching and video making process

50

 

Learned teaching skills

51

 

Competence increased, knowledge widened

52

 

Learned fundamental principles of teaching and learning, and how to learn and teach well

53

 

Learned dialectic relationship between learning and teaching

54

 

Got to know fundamental theories of learning and teaching, began to reflect on the importance of teaching and learning

55

 

Learned much about learning and teaching

56

 

Learning much about qualities of people and especially of teachers

57

 

Ability to cooperate with group members, details to pay attention to while teaching

58

 

Realized problems in teaching and learning.

59

 

Teaching method.

60

 

Learning strategies and teaching strategies

61

 

Learned the learning theory and teaching theory of the profession of educational technology

62

 

Increased my sense of responsibility as a group leader

63

 

Gained knowledge that I cannot learn from textbooks

64

 

Learned a lot, know more about teaching and learning

65

 

Learned a lot of theories on learning and teaching

66

 

Learnt how to teach, and how to conduct myself

67

 

Learned relationship between learning and teaching

68

 

Improved thinking ability

69

 

(learned) the conflict between learning and teaching, and much about the profession

70

 

Knowledge such as instructional concepts

71

 

Learned what a good educator is like

72

 

Learning methods

73

 

Learn much which is not in the textbooks

74

 

Learn many theories of learning and teaching, set foundations for future research or teaching

75

 

Learn to reasonably view and reflect on various problems in teaching and learning

76

 

Gain happiness from working in groups

77

 

What qualities should an excellent teacher have

78

 

Get new understanding about teaching

79

In which aspects do you think the teacher’s teaching needs improvement?

Now I feel all is good

80

 

Very good. Nothing for now

81

 

Nothing for now

82

 

No comment

83

 

No comment

84

 

Already very good

85

What do you suggest for the curriculum and teaching activities of this course?

More practical activities

86

 

Very good

87

 

Perfect

88

 

Change to 3 credits

89

 

Keep this classical subject, even bring it forward

90

 

The activities are all very good

91

 

Other aspects are good. Change the lecture time. Nighttime is not appropriate for a professional course

92

What do you suggest for reform in this course?

Hope the textbook is more related to the world, instead of piling up theories

93

 

More practical activities

94

 

Very good. Nothing for now

95

 

Nothing more. I like the teacher

96

 

None

97

 

Very good

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, M. (2015). Instructional Model Oriented Towards Improving Teaching Ability of Preservice Teachers. In: Li, M., Zhao, Y. (eds) Exploring Learning & Teaching in Higher Education. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55352-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55352-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55351-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55352-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics