Skip to main content

Resource-Based Fundamentals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Operations Strategy

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 3657 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the resource-based view (RBV) of global operations strategy. We first discuss resources of a firm, investigate the relationship between resource and competitive advantages, present RBV theory in the field of strategic management, and introduce concepts in resource-based global operations strategy. Second, we introduce global resource size problem in a global environment. Third, we introduce resource type problems and discuss resource flexibility in production input, production capacity, and products. Fourth, we study global location strategy and discuss location strategies in global manufacturing, global service operations, global R&D and sustainable global operations. Finally we study global dynamic capacity management and investigate the relationship between dynamic capacity and capability lifecycles. In this chapter, we use case examples including Best Buy, Shipbuilding Overcapacity Crisis, Apple versus Dell Laptops, IBM, Yahoo and Google, and a case Carrefour Expansion in China to illustrate resource-based fundamentals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambrosini, V., & Bowma, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antras, P., & Helpman, E. (2004). Global sourcing. Journal of Political Economy, 112(3), 552–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. S. (2010). VRIO framework. In Strategic management and competitive advantage (pp. 68–86). New Jersey: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandeau, M. L., & Chiu, S. S. (1989). An overview of representative problems in location research. Management Science, 35(6), 645–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1966). Strategy and structure. New York: Doubleday/Anchor Books Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K., Narasimhanb, R., & Kim, S. W. (2012). Postponement strategy for international transfer of products in a global supply chain: A system dynamics examination. Journal of Operations Management, 30, 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73, 118–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1977). Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: A search for an eclectic approach. In B. Ohlin, P.-O. Hesselborn, & P. M. Wijkman (Eds.), The international allocation of economic activity. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29, 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlenkotter, D. (1967). Two producing areas dynamic programming solutions. In A. S. Manne (Ed.), Investments for capacity expansion: Size, location and time-phasing (pp. 210–227). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlenkotter, D. (1975). Capacity planning for large multi-location systems: Approximate and incomplete dynamic programming approach. Management Science, 22, 274–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C. H., & Freund, R. M. (1990). Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity. Management Science, 36, 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, J. A. (1973). A method for emergency ambulance deployment. Management Science, 19, 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C. O., & Rao, M. R. (1975). Capacity expansion with two producing regions and concave costs. Management Science, 22, 331–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C. O., & Srinivasan, V. (1981). The multiregion dynamic capacity expansion problem, Part I and II. Operations Research, 29(4), 787–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin, D. (1993). Manufacturing flexibility: A strategic perspective. Management Science, 39(4), 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (2009). Contemporary strategy analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1984). Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010. Special issue: why is there a resource-based view? toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 889–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopmans, A. C. M. (1986). A spatial interaction model for branch bank accounts. European Journal of Operational Research, 27, 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazaz, B., Dada, M., & Moskowitz, H. (2005). Global production planning under exchange-rate uncertainty. Management Science, 51(7), 1101–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., Frazier, G. L., Roth, V. J. (1990). A transaction cost analysis model of channel integration in international markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kummerle, W. (1997). Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, N. (2010). Geographic distribution of R&D activity: How does it affect innovation quality? The Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1194–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. C., & Stevenson, K. A. (1972). On insensitivities in urban redistricting and facility location. Operations Research, 20, 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. L., Billington, C., & Carter, B. (1993). Hewlett Packard gains control of inventory and service through design for localization. Interfaces, 23(4), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luss, H. (1979). A capacity expansion model for two facility types. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 26, 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luss, H. (1982). Operations research and capacity expansion problems: A survey. Operations Research, 30(5), 907–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S. (1961). Capacity expansion and probabilistic growth. Econometrica, 29, 632–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S. (Ed.). (1967). Investments for capacity expansion: Size, location and time-phasing. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. Y., & Kotabe, M. (1999). Sourcing strategies of U.S. service companies: A modified transaction-cost analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 20(9), 791–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers PwC. (2007). Production capacity management in the automotive industry: A taxing issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psaraftis, H. N., Tharakan, G. G., & Ceder, A. (1986). Optimal response to oil spills: The strategic decision case. Operations Research, 34, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, C. S., & Laporte, G. (1996). The plant location problem: New models and research prospects. Operations Research, 44(6), 864–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. (1995). Strategic flexibility in product competition. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 135–159. Special Issue: Technological Transformation and the New Competitive Landscape.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R. G., Bates, K. A., & Junttila, M. A. (2002). A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2), 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1989). The theory of business strategy. The RAND Journal of Economics, 20(1), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J. C. P., Chang, Y.-L., & Ferguson, M. (2005). Evaluation of postponement structures to accommodate mass customization. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C. Y., & Tikoo, S. (1999). Operational flexibility and market valuation of earnings. Strategic Management Journal, 20(8), 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1980). Economics of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, A. A. (1999). The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Science, 45(10), 1339–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek, R. I. (2001). The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. Journal of Operations Management, 19(2), 161–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mieghem, J. A. (1998). Investment strategies for flexible resources. Management Science, 44(8), 1071–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. M., & Whitin, T. M. (1958). Dynamic version of the economic lot size model. Management Science, 5, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (1909) Uber den Standort der Industrien, 1909; translated as Alfred Weber’s theory of the location of industries, University of Chicago, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, W. I. (1968). Minimum concave cost flows in certain networks. Management Science, 14, 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, W. I. (1969). A backlogging model and a multi-echelon model of a dynamic economic lot size production system-a network approach. Management Science, 15, 506–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gong, Y. (2013). Resource-Based Fundamentals. In: Global Operations Strategy. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36708-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics