Skip to main content

Abstract

The scientific area of radiology of the Higher School of Health Technology of Lisbon, conducted an experimental study with the goal of investigating the influence of the tube potential (kV) on the detection of simulate chest lesions in a chest phantom. Exposure parameters influence the quality and quantity of a X-ray beam and consequently image quality, therefore influencing the observer capacity to detect lesions. To produce images with high quality, readers’ performances were compared as well as the accuracy of lesions detection associated with different tube potential and ROC (receiver operating characteristic) methodology was used to select the best ones. The proper binormal ROC curve model was used to select the reader with best performance. However, the conventional ROC curve is not adequate to select the best tube potential, because the evaluation of the images also depends on the reader’s interpretation. So, the MRMC (multiple readers multiple cases) ROC curves were proposed and, for their estimation, Dorfman–Berbaum–Metz method was used. All calculations were performed on the PROPROC, DBM-MRMC 2.2 and R free softwares.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beiden, S.V., Wagner R.F., Campbell, G.: Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. Acad. Radiol. 7, 341–349 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorfman, D.D., Berbaum, K.S., Metz, C.E.: Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest. Radiol. 27, 723–731 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hillis, S.L.: Monte Carlo validation of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method using normalized pseudovalues and less data-based model simplification. Acad. Radiol. 12, 1534–1541 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hillis, S.L.: A comparison of denominator degrees of freedom for multiple observer ROC analysis. Stat. Med. 26, 596–619 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Hillis, S.L., Berbaum, K.S.: Power estimation for the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method. Acad. Radiol. 11, 1260–1273 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hillis, S.L., Obuchowski, N.A., Schartz, K.M., Berbaum, K.S.: A comparison of the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz and Obuchowski-Rockette methods for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data. Stat. Med. 24, 1579–1607 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Ishawaran, H., Gatsonis, C.A.: A general class of hierarchical ordinal regression models with applications to correlated ROC analysis. Can. J. Stat. 28, 731–750 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimme-Smith, C., Aberle, D.R., Sayre, J.W., Hart, E.M., Greaves, S.M., Brown, K., Young, D.A., Deseran, M.D., Johnson, T., Johnson, S.L.: Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom. Am. J. Roentgenol. 165, 269–273 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lança, L., Silva, A., Alves, E., Serranheira, F., Correia, M.: Evaluation of Exposure Parameters in Plain Radiography: A Comparative Study with European Guidelines. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. (2007) doi:10.1093/rpd/ncn144

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lança, L., Silva, R., Marques, G., Silva-Fortes, C.: The influence of the tube potential (kV) on the detection of simulated chest lesions in a CR system. Eur. Radiol. 19(S1):S292 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McEntee, M.F., Brennan, P.C., Connor, G.O.: The effect of X-ray tube potential on the image quality of PA chest radiographs when using digital image acquisition devices. Radiography 10, 287–292 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Metz, C.E., Herman, B.A., Shen, J.H.: Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (roc) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat. Med. 17, 1033–1053 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Metz, C.E., Pan, X.: Proper binormal ROC curves: Theory and maximum-likelihood estimation. J. Math. Psycho. 43, 1–33 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Obuchowski, N.A., Rockette, H.E.: Hypothesis testing of the diagnostic accuracy for multiple diagnostic tests: an ANOVA approach with dependent observations. Commun. Stat. Simulat. 24, 285–308 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Obuchowski, N.A., Beiden, S., Berbaum, K.S., Hillis, S.L., Ishwaran, H., Song, H.H., Wagner, R.F.: Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic analysis. Acad. Radiol. 11, 980–995 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roe, C.A., Metz, C.E.: Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method for statistical analysis of multireader, multimodality receiver operating characteristic data: Validation with computer simulation. Acad. Radiol. 4, 298–303 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roe, C.A., Metz, C.E.: Variance-component modeling of receiver operating characteristic index estimates. Acad. Radiol. 4, 587–600 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song, H.H.: Analysis of correlated ROC area in diagnostic testing. Biometrics 53, 370–382 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Sweets, J.A.: ROC curve analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. Invest. Radiol. 14, 109–121 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sweets, J.A.: Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285–1293 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. http://perception.radiology.uiowa.edu. Cited 1 Set 2009

  22. http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl. Cited 1 Set 2009

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was partially sponsored by national funds through the Fundação Nacional para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal FCT under the project (PEst- OE/MAT/UI0006/2011), and by the FCT PhD scholarship SFRH/BD/45938/2008. The authors wish to thank an anonymous referee for all valuable suggestions on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Silva-Fortes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silva-Fortes, C., Turkman, M.A.A., Lança, L., Silva, R., Marques, G. (2013). An Application of MRMC ROC Curves on Radiology. In: Lita da Silva, J., Caeiro, F., Natário, I., Braumann, C. (eds) Advances in Regression, Survival Analysis, Extreme Values, Markov Processes and Other Statistical Applications. Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34904-1_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics