Abstract
Chemical communication is very likely used by all spiders in many contexts, but we know little about the nature of the substances involved, their biosynthesis and where and how they are perceived. However, during the last decade, it became more and more obvious that the chemical communication systems in spiders are important in reproduction, prey detection, predator avoidance and even in the context of site selection. The chemical signals involved and the spider’s responses can be highly complex and plastic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aisenberg A, Baruffaldi L, González M (2010) Behavioural evidence of male volatile pheromones in the sex-role reversed wolf spiders Allocosa brasiliensis and Allocosa alticeps. Naturwissenschaften 97:63–70
Allan RA, Elgar MA, Capon RJ (1996) Exploitation of an ant chemical alarm signal by the zodariid spider Habronestes bradleyi Walckenaer. Proc R Soc B 263:69–73
Barth FG (2002) A spider’s world: senses and behavior. Springer, Berlin
Bell RD, Rypstra AL, Persons MH (2006) The effect of predator hunger on chemically mediated antipredator responses and survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology 112:903–910
Benamú MA, Schneider MI, Sanchez NE (2010) Effects of the herbicide glyphosate on biological attributes of Alpaida veniliae (Araneae, Araneidae), in laboratory. Chemosphere 78:871–876
Bonte D (2012) Cost-benefit balance of dispersal and the evolution of conditional dispersal strategies in spiders. In: Nentwig W (ed) Spider ecophysiology. Springer, Heidelberg (this volume)
Bonte D, Van Dyck H, Bullock JM, Coulon A, Delgado M, Gibbs M, Lehouck V, Matthysen E, Mustin K, Saastamoinen M, Schtickzelle N, Stevens VM, Vandewoestijne S, Baguette M, Barton K, Benton TG, Chaput-Bardy A, Clobert J, Dytham C, Hovestadt T (2012) Costs of dispersal. Biol Rev 87:290–312
Chapman T, Davies SJ (2004) Functions and analysis of the seminal fluid proteins of male Drosophila melanogaster fruit flies. Peptides 25:1477–1490
Chinta SP, Goller S, Lux J, Funke S, Uhl G, Schulz S (2010) The sex pheromone of the wasp spider Argiope bruennichi. Angew Chem Int Ed. doi:10.1002/anie.200906311
Clark RJ, Harland DP, Jackson RR (2000) Speculative hunting by an araneophagic salticid spider. Behaviour 137:1601–1612
Cross FR, Jackson RR (2009) How cross-modality effects during intraspecific interactions of jumping spiders differ depending on whether a female-choice or mutual-choice mating system is adopted. Behav Processes 80:162–168
Cross FR, Jackson RR, Pollard SD (2009) How blood-derived odor influences mate-choice decisions by a mosquito-eating predator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19416–19419
Dicke M, Grostal P (2001) Chemical detection of natural enemies by arthropods: an ecological perspective. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:1–23
Eberhard WG (1981) The single line web of Phoroncidia studo Levi (Araneae: Theridiidae): a prey attractant? J Arachnol 9:229–232
Eberhard WG, Guzman Gomez S, Catley KM (1993) Correlation between spermathecal morphology and mating systems in spiders. Biol J Linn Soc 50:197–209
Elias DO, Hebets EA, Hoy RR, Mason AC (2005) Seismic signals are crucial for male mating success in a visual specialist jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae). Anim Behav 69:931–938
Foelix RF (2011) The biology of spiders. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Foelix RF, Chu-Wang I-W (1973) The morphology of spider sensilla. II. Chemoreceptors. Tissue Cell 5:461–478
Foellmer MW, Fairbairn DJ (2003) Spontaneous male death during copulation in an orb weaving spider. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S183–S185
Francke W, Schulz S (1999) Pheromones. In: Barton D, Nakanishi K, Meth-Cohn O, Mori K (eds) Comprehensive natural products chemistry, vol 8. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Gaskett AC (2007) Spider sex pheromones: emission, reception, structures, and function. Biol Rev 82:27–48
Gemeno C, Yeargan KV, Haynes KF (2000) Aggressive chemical mimicry by the bolas spider Mastophora hutchinsoni: identification and quantification of a major prey’s sex pheromone components in the spider’s volatile emissions. J Chem Ecol 26:1235–1243
Griesinger LM, Evans SC, Rypstra AL (2011) Effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide on mate location in a wolf spider that inhabits agroecosystems. Chemosphere 84:1461–1466
Haynes KF, Yeargan KV, Gemeno C (2001) Detection of prey by a spider that aggressively mimics pheromone blends. J Insect Behav 14:535–543
Haynes KF, Gemeno C, Yeargan KV, Millar JG, Johnson KM (2002) Aggressive chemical mimicry of moth pheromones by a bolas spider: how does this specialist predator attract more than one species of prey? Chemoecology 12:99–105
Heiling AM, Cheng K, Herberstein ME (2004) Exploitation of floral signals by crab spiders (Thomisus spectabilis, Thomisidae). Behav Ecol 15:321–326
Herberstein ME, Wignall A (2011) Deceptive signals in spiders. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour. Flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hosken DJ, Stockley P (2003) Benefits of polyandry: a life history perspective. Evol Biol 33:173–194
Hostettler S, Nentwig W (2006) Olfactory information saves venom during prey-capture of the hunting spider Cupiennius salei (Araneae: Ctenidae). Funct Ecol 20:369–375
Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defence. Ecology 85:1503–1511
Jackson RR, Clark RJ, Harland DP (2002) Behavioural and cognitive influences of kairomones on an araneophagic jumping spider. Behaviour 139:749–775
Jackson RR, Nelson XJ, Sune GO (2005) A spider that feeds indirectly on vertebrate blood by choosing female mosquitoes as prey. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15155–15160
Jerhod E, Stoltz JA, Andrade MCB, Schulz S (2010) Acylated serine derivative: a new class of arthropod pheromones of the Australian redback spider, Latrodectus hasselti. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:1–5
Johanson BG, Jones TM (2007) The role of chemical communication in mate choice. Biol Rev 82:265–289
Johnson A, Revis O, Chadwik Johnson J (2011) Chemical prey cues influence the urban microhabitat preferences of Western black widow spiders, Latrodectus hesperus. J Arachnol 39:449–453
Johnston RE (2003) Chemical communication in rodents: from pheromones to individual recognition. J Mammal 84:1141–1162
Junker RR, Blüthgen N (2010) Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones. Ann Bot 105:777–782
Junker RR, Bretscher S, Dötterl S, Blüthgen N (2011) Phytochemical cues affect hunting-site choices of a nursery web spider (Pisaura mirabilis) but not a crab spider (Misumena vatia). J Arachnol 39:113–117
Jurenka R (2004) Insect pheromone biosynthesis. Top Curr Chem 239:97–132
Kasumovic MM, Andrade MCB (2004) Discrimination of airborne pheromones by mate-searching male western black widow spiders (Latrodectus hesperus): species- and population-specific responses. Can J Zool 82:1027–1034
Kevan PG, Greco CF (2001) Contrasting patch choice behaviour by immature ambush predators, a spider (Misumena vatia) and an insect (Phymata americana). Ecol Entomol 26:148–153
Koh TH, Seah WK, Yap L-MYL, Li D (2009) Pheromone-bases female mate choice and its effect on reproductive investment in a spitting spider. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:923–930
Lehmann LM, Walker SE, Persons MH (2004) The influence of predator sex on chemically mediated antipredator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology 110:323–339
Levi HW (1993) The orb-weaver genus Kaira (Araneae, Araneidae). J Arachnol 21:209–225
Li D, Jackson RR (2005) Influence of diet-related chemical cues from predators on the hatching of egg-carrying spiders. J Chem Ecol 31:333–342
Lürling M, Scheffer M (2007) Info-disruption: pollution and the transfer of chemical information between organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 22:374–379
McGregor PK (2005) Communication. In: Bolhuis JJ, Giraldear L-A (eds) The behaviour of animals. Mechanisms, function, and evolution. Blackwell, Oxford
Michalkova V, Pekár S (2009) How glyphosate altered the behaviour of agrobiont spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) and beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Biol Control 51:444–449
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2011a) Flexibility in the foraging strategies of spiders. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour. Flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2011b) Flexible use of anti-predator defences. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour. Flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nentwig W (1987) The prey of spiders. In: Nentwig W (ed) Ecophysiology of spiders. Springer, Berlin
Nessler SH, Uhl G, Schneider JM (2007) Genital damage in the orb-weaving spider Argiope bruennichi (Araneae: Araneidae) maximises paternity success. Behav Ecol 18:174–181
Papke MD, Riechert SE, Schulz S (2001) An airborne female pheromone associated with male attraction and courtship in a desert spider. Anim Behav 61:877–886
Peckham GW, Peckham EG (1887) Some observations on the mental powers of spiders. J Morphol 1:383–419
Pekár S (2012) Side-effect of synthetic pesticides on spiders. In: Nentwig W (ed) Spider ecophysiology. Springer, Heidelberg (this volume)
Persons MH, Lynam EC (2004) Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae) spiderling movement in the presence of conspecific and heterospecific silk and excreta. J Arachnol 32:341–344
Persons MH, Rypstra AL (2000) Preference for chemical cues associated with recent prey in the wolf spider Hogna helluo (Araneae: Lycosidae). Ethology 106:27–35
Persons MH, Rypstra AL (2001) Wolf spiders show graded antipredator behavior in the presence of chemical cues from different sized predators. J Chem Ecol 27:2493–2503
Persons MH, Walker SE, Rypsta AL, Marshall SD (2001) Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 61:43–51
Persons MH, Walker SE, Rypsta AL (2002) Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactic cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav Ecol 13:386–392
Punzo F, Kukoyi O (1997) The effects of prey chemical cues on patch residence time in the wolf spider Trochosa parthenus (Chamberlin) (Lycosidae) and the lynx spider Oxyopes salticus Hentz (Oxyopidae). Bull Brit Arachnol Soc 10:323–326
Schäfer MA, Misof B, Uhl G (2008) Effects of body size of both sexes and female mating history on male mating behavior and paternity success in a spider. Anim Behav 76:75–86
Schneider JM, Gilberg S, Fromhage L, Uhl G (2006) Sexual conflict over remating in a cannibalistic spider. Anim Behav 71:781–788
Schonewolf KW, Bell R, Rypstra AL, Persons MH (2006) Field evidence of an airborne enemy avoidance kairomone in wolf spiders. J Chem Ecol 32:1565–1576
Schulz S (2004) Semiochemistry of spiders. In: Cardé RT, Miller JG (eds) Advances in insect chemical ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schulz S, Toft S (1993) Identification of a sex pheromone from a spider. Science 260:1635–1637
Searcy LE, Rypstra AL, Persons MH (1999) Airborne chemical communication in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina. J Chem Ecol 25:2527–2533
Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Singer F, Riechert SE, Xu H, Morris AW, Becker E, Hale JA, Noureddine MA (2000) Analysis of courtship success in the funnel web spider Agelenopsis aperta. Behaviour 137:93–117
Stowe MK, Tumlinson JH, Heath RR (1987) Chemical mimicry: bolas spiders emit components of moth prey species sex pheromones. Science 236:964–967
Stowe MK, Turlings TCJ, Loughrin JH, Lewis WJ, Tumlinson JH (1995) The chemistry of eavesdropping, alarm, and deceit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:23–28
Tichy H, Gingl E, Ehn R, Papke M, Schulz S (2001) Female sex pheromone of a wandering spider (Cupiennius salei): identification and sensory reception. J Comp Physiol A 187:75–78
Townley MA, Tillinghast E (2012) Aggregate silk gland secretions of araneoid spiders. In: Nentwig W (ed) Spider ecophysiology. Springer, Heidelberg (this volume)
Trabalon M (2012) Chemical communication and contact cuticular compounds in spiders. In: Nentwig W (ed) Spider ecophysiology. Springer, Heidelberg (this volume)
Uhl G (1994) Genital morphology and sperm storage in Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin) (Pholcidae; Araneae). Acta Zool 75:13–25
Uhl G, Elias DO (2011) Communication. In: Herberstein ME (ed) Spider behaviour. Flexibility and versatility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Uhl G, Nessler SH, Schneider JM (2010) Securing paternity in spiders? A review on occurrence and effects of mating plugs and male genital mutilation. Genetica 138:75–104
Vereecken NJ, McNeil JN (2010) Cheaters and liars: chemical mimicry at its best. Can J Zool 88:725–752
Watson PJ (1986) Transmission of a female sex pheromone thwarted by males in the spider Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Science 233:219–220
Wrinn KM, Evans SC, Rypstra AL (2012) Predator cues and an herbicide affect activity and emigration in an agrobiont wolf spider. Chemosphere 87:390–396
Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Xiao Y, Zhang J, Li S (2009) A two-component female-produced pheromone of the spider Pholcus beijingensis. J Chem Ecol 35:769–778
Yeargan KV (1994) Biology of bolas spiders. Annu Rev Entomol 39:81–99
Yeargan KV, Quate LW (1996) Juvenile bolas spiders attract psychodid flies. Oecologia 106:266–271
Acknowledgements
I cordially thank Ken Haynes, Michael Schmitt and Maxene Graze for critically reading the manuscript and many colleagues for providing colour photographs of some of the treated species.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uhl, G. (2013). Spider Olfaction: Attracting, Detecting, Luring and Avoiding. In: Nentwig, W. (eds) Spider Ecophysiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33989-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33989-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33988-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33989-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)