Skip to main content

Evaluating the Validity of a Non-invasive Assessment Procedure

  • Conference paper
Serious Games Development and Applications (SGDA 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7528))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent developments in serious games allow for in-game adaptations to enhance the learner´s current cognitive, motivational or emotional state. Providing suitable adaptations requires a valid assessment of the psycho-pedagogical constructs the game should adapt to. An explicit assessment, e.g. by questionnaires occurring repeatedly on the screen, would impair the learner´s game flow. Therefore, a non-invasive and implicit assessment procedure is required. In the course of the European research project TARGET, we established an assessment procedure which is based on the interpretation of the learner´s actions in the virtual environment, calledBehavioural Indicators (BIs). A set of 16 BIs has been formulated to assess the learner´s current emotional, motivational and clearness state. In this present work, we describe how these BIs can be validated and focus on the innovative elements of the methodological procedure, the material, experiential considerations and the statistical analysis to be applied in an empirical study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Collins, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kopeinik, S., Bedek, M.A., Seitlinger, P.C., Albert, D.: The Artificial Mentor: An assessment based approach to adaptively enhance learning processes in virtual learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 106–110. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Chiang Mai (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bedek, M.A., Seitlinger, P., Kopeinik, S., Albert, D.: Multivariate Assessment of Motivation and Emotion in Digital Educational Games. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Games-Based Learning, pp. 18–25. ACI, Athens (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson, J.W.: Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review 64(6), 359–372 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Covington, M.V., Omelich, C.L.: Need achievement revisited: verification of Atkinson’s original 2 x 2 model. In: Spielberger, C.D., Sarason, I.G., Kulcsar, Z., Van Heck, G.L. (eds.) Stress and Emotion: Anxiety, Anger and Curiosity, pp. 85–105. Hemisphere, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Larsen, R.J., Diener, E.: Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In: Clark, M.S. (ed.) Review of Personality and Social Psychology: Emotion, pp. 25–29. Sage, Newbury Park (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Insko, B.E.: Measuring Presence: Subjective, behavioral and physiological methods. In: Riva, G., Davide, F., Ijsselsteijn, W.A. (eds.) Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurement of User Presence in Synthetic Environments, pp. 110–118. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van Reekum, C.M., Johnstone, T., Banse, R., Etter, A., Wehrle, T., Scherer, K.R.: Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game. Cognition and Emotion 18(5), 663–688 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai, H., Lin, Y.: Modeling of operators’ emotion and task performance in a virtual driving environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69(9), 571–586 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang, P.J.: Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. In: Sidowski, J.B., Johnson, J.H., Williams, T.A. (eds.) Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery System, pp. 119–137. Ablex, Norwood (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., Burns, B.D.: FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Er-fassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. Diagnostica 2, 57–66 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peter, C., Herbon, A.: Emotion representation and physiology assignments in digital systems. Interacting with Computers 18, 139–170 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lane, R.D., Nadel, L.: Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A.: An approach to environmental psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry 25, 49–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sokolowski, K., Schmalt, H.D., Langens, T.A., Puca, R.M.: Assessing Achievement, Affiliation, and Power Motives All at Once: The Multi-Motive Grid (MMG). Journal of Personality Assessment 74, 126–145 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ziegler, M., Schmukle, S., Egloff, B., Bühner, M.: Investigating Measures of Achievement Motivation. Journal of Individual Differences 31, 15–21 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McClelland, D.C.: Biological aspects of human motivation. In: Halisch, F., Kulh, J. (eds.) Motivation, Intention, and Volition, pp. 11–19. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Spangler, W.D.: Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 112, 140–154 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmalt, H.D.: The measurement of the Achievement Motivation. Hogrefe, Göttingen (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Puca, R.M., Schmalt, H.D.: Task enjoyment: A mediator between achievement motives and performance. Motivation and Emotion 23, 15–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sokolowski, K., Kehr, H.: Zum differentiellen Einfluss von Motivation auf Führungstrainings (MbO). Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 20, 192–202 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmalt, H.D., Langens, T.A.: Projective, semiprojective and self-report measures of human motivation predict private cognitive events: Strivings, memories and daydreams., University of Wuppertal (2001) (unpubl. manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pretz, J.E., Naples, A.J., Sternberg, R.J.: Recognizing, Defining, and Repre-senting Problems. In: Davidson, J.E., Steinberg, R.J. (eds.) The Psychology of Problem Solving, pp. 3–31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Pirolli, P., Card, S.K.: Information Foraging. Psychological Review 106, 643–675 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seitlinger, P.C., Bedek, M.A., Kopeinik, S., Albert, D. (2012). Evaluating the Validity of a Non-invasive Assessment Procedure. In: Ma, M., Oliveira, M.F., Hauge, J.B., Duin, H., Thoben, KD. (eds) Serious Games Development and Applications. SGDA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7528. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33687-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33687-4_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33686-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33687-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics