Abstract
Predictability is examined in plant responsiveness to stress, along with extents of resource trade-offs in growth/defence allocation, value of conflicting findings for theory development, and eventually, need for new theoretical concepts on the book’s subject. “Opportunities” are summarized plants possess in regulating resource allocation beyond apparent trade-offs and their associated “opportunity costs”, mediating to empirical and theoretical means for enhancing predictability. Acknowledging high functional and structural plasticity, and hence complexity, in plant responsiveness as a key feature of evolutionary success, both empirical capacities of molecular research are summarized in strengthening predictability across spatio-temporal scales and modelling as interacting theoretical concepts. Novel numerical and statistical modelling approaches are comprehended in reconciling conflicting empirical evidence and assessing degrees of universality. Not being unifying renders the “growth–differentiation-balance theory” falsifiable towards mechanistic consolidation as the grounds of advanced theory building. Mechanistic comprehension of plasticity becomes the key to plant system understanding.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baldocchi DD (1993) Scaling water vapor and carbon dioxide exchange from leaves to a canopy: rules and tools. In: Ehleringer JR, Field CB (eds) Scaling physiological processes, leaf to globe. Academic, San Diego, pp 77–114
Elstner EF, Oßwald WF, Schneider I (1996) Phytopathologie: Allgemeine und biochemische Grundlagen. Spektrum Akademischer, Heidelberg
Fleischmann F, Raidl S, Oßwald W (2010) Changes in susceptibility of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings towards Phytophthora citricola under the influence of elevated atmospheric CO2 and nitrogen fertilization. Environ Pollut 158:1051–1060
Häberle KH, Nunn A, Reiter I, Werner H, Heller W, Bahnweg G, Gayler S, Lütz C, Matyssek R (2009) Variation of defence-related metabolites in the foliage of adult beech and spruce: a conceptual approach to approximating traded-off carbon. Eur J Forest Res 128:99–108
Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335
Koricheva J (2002) Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses. Ecology 83:176–190
Koricheva J, Larsson S, Haukioja E, Keinänen M (1998) Regulation od woody plant secondary metabolism by resource availability: hypothesis testing by means of meta-analysis. Oikos 83:212–226
Kozovits AR, Matyssek R, Blaschke H, Göttlein A, Grams TEE (2005) Competition increasingly dominates the responsiveness of juvenile beech and spruce to elevated CO2 and/or O3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Glob Chance Biol 11:1387–1401
Lerdau M, Gershenzon J (1997) Allocation theory and chemical defense. In: Bazzaz FA, Grace J (eds) Plant resource allocation. Academic, San Diego, pp 265–277
Loomis WE (1953) Growth and differentiation – an introduction and summary. In: Loomis WE (ed) Growth and differentiation in plants. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp 1–17
Lorio PL Jr (1988) Growth and differentiation balance relationships in pines affect their resistance to bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scoloytidae). In: Mattson WJ, Levieux J, Bernard-Dagan C (eds) Mechanisms of woody plant defenses against insects: search for pattern. Springer, New York, pp 73–92
Matyssek R, Schnyder H, Elstner E-F, Munch J-C, Pretzsch H, Sandermann H (2002) Growth and parasite defence in plants: the balance between resource sequestration and retention. Plant Biol 4:133–136
Matyssek R, Agerer R, Ernst D, Munch J-C, Osswald W, Pretzsch H, Priesack E, Schnyder H, Treutter D (2005) The plant’s capacity in regulating resource demand. Plant Biol 7:560–580
Maurer S, Matyssek R (1997) Nutrition and the ozone sensitivity of birch (Betula pendula), II. Carbon balance, water-use efficiency and nutritional status of the whole plant. Trees 12:11–20
Oßwald WF (1995) Die Wirt-Parasit-Beziehungen – Bakterien und Pilze als Parasiten. In: Hock B, Elstner EF (eds) Schadwirkungen auf Pflanzen, vol 3. Spektrum Akademischer, Heidelberg, pp 315–369
Popper KR (1969) Logik der Forschung. J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, p 441
Pretzsch H, Dieler J (2012) Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory. Oecologia. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2240-5
Ros B, Thümmler F, Wenzel G (2004) Analysis of differentially expressed genes in a susceptible and moderately resistant potato cultivar upon Phytophthora infestans infection. Mol Plant Pathol 5:191–201
Rühmann S, Leser C, Bannert M, Treutter D (2002) Relationship between growth, secondary metabolism, and resistance of apple. Plant Biol 4:137–143
Sandermann H, Matyssek R (2004) Scaling up from molecular to ecological processes. In: Sandermann H (ed) Molecular ecotoxicology of plants, vol 170, Ecological studies. Springer, Berlin, pp 207–226
Sibly RM, Vincent JFV (1997) Optimality approaches to resource allocation in woody tissue. In: Bazzaz FA, Grace J (eds) Plant resource allocation. Academic, San Diego, pp 143–160
Stamp N (2003) Theory of plant defensive level: example of process and pitfalls in development of ecological theory. Oikos 102:672–678
Taylor LP, Grotewold E (2005) Flavonoids as developmental regulators. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:317–323
Vapnik VN (1995) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York
Walters D, Walsh D, Newton A, Lyon G (2005) Induced resistance for plant disease control: maximizing the efficacy of resistance elicitors. Phytopathology 95:1368–1373
Zangerl AB, Bazzaz FA (1992) Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbicides and pathogens. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 363–391
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matyssek, R. et al. (2012). Predictability of Plant Resource Allocation: New Theory Needed?. In: Matyssek, R., Schnyder, H., Oßwald, W., Ernst, D., Munch, J., Pretzsch, H. (eds) Growth and Defence in Plants. Ecological Studies, vol 220. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30645-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30645-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30644-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30645-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)