A Study of the Attenuation in the Properties of Haptic Devices at the Limit of the Workspace
In the context of the optimization in virtual reality systems involving a haptic device, this paper introduces a correction in the formula that defined the performance of the device near the boundary of its workspace. We introduce too corrections to an index based on the Manipulability which takes in account the frequency with which each zone of the application workspace is visited during the simulation process, in order to help the designer for obtaining the best positioning of the device respect to the virtual environment. We demonstrate the new formula studying three different tasks to be accomplished. Finally we look for this best positioning analyzing not only the displacement but the different orientations we can introduce in the virtual environment in order to take advantage of the best zones of the workspace in terms of Manipulability.
KeywordsVirtual reality Haptic interface Manipulability Mechanical Performance Optimal designing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Yoshikawa, T.: Foundations of Robotics: Analysis and Control. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
- 2.Yoshikawa, T.: Manipulability of Robotic Mechanisms. The International Journal of Robotics research (1985)Google Scholar
- 3.San Martin, J., Trivino, G.: Measurement of Suitability of a Haptic Device in a Virtual Reality System. In: Proc. 2nd International Conference on Virtual Reality HCII 2007 (July 2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Pham, H.H., Chen, I.-M.: Optimal Synthesis for Workspace and Manipulability of Parallel Flexure Mechanism. In: Proceeding of the 11th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Tianjin, China, August 18-21 (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.San Martin, J., Trivino, G.: Mechanical Design of a Minimal Invasive Surgery Trainer Using the Manipulability as Measure of Optimization. In: IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics ICM 2007, Kumamoto, Japan (May 2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Yoshikawa, T.: Manipulability and redundancy control of robotic mechanisms. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, March 1985, vol. 2, pp. 1004–1009 (1985)Google Scholar
- 9.Yamamoto, Y., Yun, X.: Unified analysis on mobility and manipulability of mobilemanipulators. In: Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, vol. 2, pp. 1200–1206 (1999)Google Scholar
- 12.Alqasemi, R.M., McCaffrey, E.J., Edwards, K.D., Dubey, R.V.: Analysis, evaluation and development of wheelchair-mounted robotic arms. In: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2005, June 28-July 1, 2005, pp. 469–472 (2005)Google Scholar
- 13.Guilamo, L., Kuffner, J., Nishiwaki, K., Kagami, S.: Manipulability optimization for trajectory generation. In: Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2006, May 15-19, 2006, pp. 2017–2022 (2006)Google Scholar
- 14.Masuda, T., Fujiwara, M., Kato, N., Arai, T.: Mechanism Configuration Evaluation of a Linear-Actuated Parallel Mechanism Using Manipulability. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics 8 Automation, Washington, DC (May 2002)Google Scholar
- 16.Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt Jr., C.D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science (220), 671–680 (May 13, 1983)Google Scholar