Skip to main content

A Landmarker Selection Algorithm Based on Correlation and Efficiency Criteria

  • Conference paper
AI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3339))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Landmarking is a recent and promising meta-learning strategy, which defines meta-features that are themselves efficient learning algorithms. However, the choice of landmarkers is often made in an ad hoc manner. In this paper, we propose a new perspective and set of criteria for landmarkers. Based on the new criteria, we propose a landmarker generation algorithm, which generates a set of landmarkers that are each subsets of the algorithms being landmarked. Our experiments show that the landmarkers formed, when used with linear regression are able to estimate the accuracy of a set of candidate algorithms well, while only utilising a small fraction of the computational cost required to evaluate those candidate algorithms via ten-fold cross-validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bensusan, H.: God doesn’t always shave with Occam’s Razor: learning when and how to prune. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 119–124. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bensusan, H., Giraud-Carrier, C.: Casa Batló is in Passeig de Gràcia or landmarking the expertise space. In: Proc. ECML, Workshop. on Meta-learning: Building automatic advice strategies for model selection and method combination, pp. 29–46 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blake, C., Merz, C.: UCI repository of machine learning databases. Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences. University of California, Irvine (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brazdil, P., Gama, J., Henery, R.: Characterizing the applicability of classification algorithms using meta level learning. In: Bergadano, F., De Raedt, L. (eds.) ECML 1994. LNCS, vol. 784, pp. 84–102. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brazdil, P., Soares, C., Costa, J.: Ranking learning algorithms: Using IBL and meta-learning on accuracy and time results. Machine Learning 50(3), 251–277 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fürnkranz, J., Petrak, J.: An evaluation of landmarking variants. In: Proc. ECML, Workshop. on integrating aspects of data mining, decision support and meta-learning, pp. 57–68 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fürnkranz, J., Petrak, J., Brazdil, P., Soares, C.: On the use of fast subsampling estimates for algorithm recommendation. Technical Report, Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giraud-Carrier, C., Vilalta, R., Brazdil, P.: Introduction to the special issue on meta-learning. Machine Learning 54(3), 187–193 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalousis, A., Hilario, M.: Feature selection for meta-learning. In: Cheung, D., Williams, G.J., Li, Q. (eds.) PAKDD 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2035, pp. 222–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalousis, A., Hilario, M.: Model selection via meta-learning: a comparative study. Int. J. Artificial Intelligence Tools 10(4), 525–554 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Köpf, C., Taylor, C., Keller, J.: Meta-analysis: from data characterisation for meta-learning to meta-regression. In: Proc. PKDD, Workshop. on Data Mining, Decision Support, Meta-learning and ILP (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D., Taylor, C.: Machine learning, neural and statistical classification, Ellis Horwood (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pfahringer, B., Bensusan, H., Giraud-Carrier, C.: Meta-learning by landmarking various learning algorithms. In: Proc. ICML, pp. 743–750 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schaffer, C.: Technical note: selecting a classification method by cross-validation. Machine Learning 13(1), 135–143 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vilalta, R., Drissi, Y.: A perspective view and survey of meta-learning. J. Artificial Intelligence Review 18(2), 77–95 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wickens, T.: The geometry of multivariate statistics. LEA Publishers (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Witten, I., Frank, E.: Data mining: practical machine learning tools with Java implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wolpert, D.: The supervised learning no-free-lunch theorems. In: Proc. Soft Computing in Industry - Recent Applications, pp. 25–42 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ler, D., Koprinska, I., Chawla, S. (2004). A Landmarker Selection Algorithm Based on Correlation and Efficiency Criteria. In: Webb, G.I., Yu, X. (eds) AI 2004: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3339. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30549-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30549-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30549-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics