Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Bedeutung von Vertrauen in schwach formalisierten Organisationen – Konsequenzen für die Führungspraxis

  • Chapter
Die Organisation in Supervision und Coaching

Zusammenfassung

Der folgende Beitrag geht der Frage nach, welche Rolle Vertrauen in Organisationen spielt, die auf relativ wenig formellen Regeln basieren. Dabei wird verdeutlicht, dass Vertrauen nur bei nicht vorhandenen Möglichkeiten der Leistungskontrolle oder einer auf Selbstabstimmung der Mitarbeiter setzenden Organisationsform relevant ist. In beiden Fällen gibt es keine ausreichenden organisatorischen Maßnahmen, sodass riskante Alternativen zum Einsatz kommen, welche Vertrauen benötigen, um effizient und effektiv sein zu können. Auf Basis einer attributionstheoretischen Erklärung der Entstehung von Vertrauen werden die Möglichkeiten eines vertrauensorientierten Fühnmgsverhaltens diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arkin, R., Sheppard, J. (1989). Self-Presentation Styles in Organizations. In: R. Giacalone, P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression Managment in the Organisation (pp. 125–139). Hillsday (N.J.): Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J., Hansen, M. (1994). Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage. Strategie Management Journal, 15, 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., Crant, J.M. (2000). Dyadie Communication Relationships in Organization. An Attribution/Expectancy Approach. Organisation Science, 11,648–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, J., Eccles, R. (1989). Price, Authority, and Trust. From Ideal Types to Plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15,97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J., Hale, J. (1984). The Fundamental Topic of Relational Communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1991). Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory. Journal of Managment, 17,643–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1991). Grundlagen der Sozialtheorie. Bd 1: Handlungen und Handlungssyteme. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, D., Miles, R. (1996). A Conceptual Framework Linking Organizational Forms, Managerial Philosophies, and the Opportunity Cost of Control. In: R. Kramer, T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organisations (pp. 16–38). Thousand Oaks: BookSurge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K., Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between Trust and Control. Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23, 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T.K., Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22, 251–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K., Ferrin, D. (2001). The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings. Organizational Science, 12 (4),450–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, P. (2004). The Development of Trust and Implications for Organizational Design: A Game- and Attribution-Theoretical Framework. Schmalenbachs Business Review, 56, 258–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. (1968). Identity – youth and crisis, New York: Norton (dt.: Jugend und Krise. Stuttgart: Klett, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin, D., Dirks, K. (2003). The Use of Rewards to Increase and Decrease Trust: Mediating Processes and Differential Effects. Organisation Science, 14, 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W., Martinko, M. (1988). Impression Management: An Observational Study Linking Audience Characteristics With Verbal Self-Presentation. Academy of Management Journal, 31,42–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, G., Breen, B. (2007). The Future of Management Boston: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, U., Littek, W. (1995). Wandel von Vertrauensbeziehungen im Arbeitsprozeß. Soziale Welt, 3,282–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. (1967). Attribution Theory in Social Interaction. In: D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–238). Lincoln (N.E.): University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. (1983). Analyzing Close Relationships. In: H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. Harvey (Eds.), Close Relationships (pp. 20–67). NewYork: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P.H., Dirks, K.T., Cooper, C.D. (2009). The repair of trust: A dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel conceptualization s. Academy of Management Review, 34 (3), 401–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. (1998). Introduction: Theories and Issues in the Study of Trust. In: C. Lane, R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust Within and Between Organisations. Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applicasions (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In: D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 94–107). Cambridge (Mass.): Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1989). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (Vol. 3). Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Davis, J., Schoorman, D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizationa1 Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Perrone, V., Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an Organizing Princip1e. Organisation Science, 14,91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R, Creed, D. (1995). Organizational Forms and Managerial Philosophies. A Descriptive and Analytical Review. In: B. Staw, L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 333–372). Greenwich (Conn.): JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in Fives. Designing Effective Organisations. Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (1996). Trust, Opportunism and Governance: A Process and Control Model. Organisation Studies, 17 (6),985–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2002a). Trust. Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2002b). Trust. Forms, foundations, functions, Failures and Figures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. (1979). A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizationa1 Contro1 Mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. (1980). Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petermann, F. (1996). Psychologie des Vertrauens (3. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy. Network Forms of Organizations. In: B. Staw, L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12, pp. 295–326). Greenwich (Conn.): JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rempel, J., Holmes, J., Zanna, M. (1985). Trust in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, P. (1996). Fragile and Resilient Trust and Thier Ro1es in Economic Exchange. Business & Society, 35 (2),148–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripperger, A. (1998). Ökonomik des Vertrauens. Analyse eines Organisationsprinzips. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. (1980). Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R, Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Crossdiscipline View of Trust. Introduction to Special Topic Forum. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 393–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B., Weigold,M. (1992). Interpersonal Processes Invo1ving Impression Regulation and Management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 133–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F.D., Mayer, RC., Davis, J.H. (2007). An Intergrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future Academy of Management Review, 32 (2), 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. (2008). Organisation. Grundlagen moderner Organisationsgestaltung (5. Aufl. ed.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B., Sherman, D. (1998). The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications. Academy of Management Review, 23, 422–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J., Windeler, A. (2003). Knowledge, trust, and control. Managing tensions and contradictions in a regional network of service firms. International Studies of Management and Organisation, 33, 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, E.C., Mayer, R.C. (2009). The Role of Causal Attribution Dimensions in Trust Repair Academy of Management Review, 34 (1), 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in Organizational Authorities: The Infleunce of Motive Attributions on Willigness to Accept Decisions. In: R. Kramer, T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organisations. Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 331–356). Thousand Oaks (CA): BookSurge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, J. (1997). Vertrauen und Kontrolle in Transaktionen. Eine institutionenökonomische Analyse. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. (1993). Calculativeness, Trust and Economic Organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36,453–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 18401920. In: L. Cummings. (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behaviour (pp. 53–111). Greenwich (Conn.): JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Peter Eberl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Schreyögg Astrid Schmidt-Lellek Christoph

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eberl, P. (2010). Die Bedeutung von Vertrauen in schwach formalisierten Organisationen – Konsequenzen für die Führungspraxis. In: Astrid, S., Christoph, SL. (eds) Die Organisation in Supervision und Coaching. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92173-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92173-0_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17104-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-92173-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation