Skip to main content

The “rational” organization reconsidered — An exploration of some of the organizational implications of selforganizing

  • Chapter
Organisatorische Veränderung und Corporate Governance

Part of the book series: Entscheidungs- und Organisationstheorie ((EOT))

  • 230 Accesses

Abstract

This paper argues for an enlargement of our conception of rationality to include forms of reasoning, intelligence and cognition that are communicatively, rather than discursively, based. To defend the thesis that understanding emerges in the collective interactive processes of practically situated conversation, as well as in individual thought, the paper examines the theoretical literature devoted to self-organizing systems, and the empirical literature which describes how distributed intelligence is developed by groups in materially embedded contexts of work. It then explores the phenomenon of emergence of organization as an actor, capable of expressing an intention, and participating in a dialogue involving other organizations. It explains this phenomenon of the emerging organizational self as a logical implication of the theory of self-organizing which predicates selfness as an effect of the coupling of an autopoietic system to an observer. While this has tended to be interpreted in inter-subjective contexts of communication it can also be applied to organizational communication. Implications of such a revision of perspective are briefly considered, including a critique of current interpretations of dialogics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays ( V. W. McGee & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baraldi, C. (1993). Structural coupling: Simultaneity and difference between communication and thought. Communication Theory, 3 (2), 112–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R. (1996). Foreword, Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job (Julian E. Orr, author), (pp. IX–XVI). Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. C. (1977). Daddy, can a scientist be wise? In J. Brockman (Ed.), About Bateson (pp. 57–73 ). New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzell, P. & Herzberg, B. (Eds). (1991). The rhetorical tradition: Reading from classical times to the present. Boston, MA: Redford Books of St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, A. (1997). Enterprise modelling: Case studies and business process re- engineering, Introduction. SIG Group Bulletin, 18 (1), 49–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1955). The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, J. (Ed.). (1977). About Bateson. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. (1985). The irrational organization: Irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T. (1990). Dewey on defeasibility. In R. Cooper, K. Mukai, & J. Perry, eds., Situation theory and its applications, Vol. 1. (pp. 233–268 ). Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, T. (1994). Dewey’s new logic: A reply to Russell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In A.V. Cicourel & K. Knorr-Cetina, eds., Advances in social theory and methodology: Towards an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies (pp. 277–303 ). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, G. (1991). Rhetoric in an organizational society:Managing multiple identities. Columbia SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. R., March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F. (2000a). Toward another ideal speech situation: A critique of Habermas’ reinterpretation of speech act theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 86 (3), 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F. (2000b). The organizing property of communication. Philadelphia/Amsterdam, John Benjamins & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F. & Taylor, J.R. (1997). Organization as an effect of mediation: Redefining the link between organization and communication. Communication Theory, 7 (3), 219–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, D. (1998). Rationality reborn: Historical roots of the passive voice in scientific discourse. In J. T. Battalio, (Ed.), Essays in the study of scientific discourse: Methods, practice, and pedagogy (pp. 117–135). Stamford, CT: Ablex (Volume 6 in ATTW Contemporary Studies in Technical Communication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dürkheim, E. (1915). Elementary forms of religious life: a study in religious sociology (J. W. Swain, Trans.). New York: The Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Communication Research, 17 (2), 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, E. M. (1998). Flirting with meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17 (1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engestrom, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R. & Russell, H. M. (1977). Communicating and organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayol, H. (1949). General and industrial management. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. ( 1972 [1969]). The archeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan-Smith, Trans). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1998). Language and solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsburg dilemma. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, H. H. & Mills, C. W. ( 1958 [1946]). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. New York: Oxford University Press (Galaxy).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H. (1996). Seeing as situated activity: Formulating planes. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work, (pp. 61–95 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, L. & Urwick, L. (1937). Papers on the science of administration. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. ( 1970 [1968]). Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. ( 1976 [1969]). The analytical theory of science and dialectics. The positivist dispute in German sociology (pp. 131–162 ). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, M. & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, W. (1982). Ethnomethodology: How people make sense. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, L. (1999). The dialogics of conversation: Power, control, vulnerability. Communication Theory, 9 (3), 229–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1996). Convergent activities: Line control and passenger information on the London Underground. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 96–129 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M ( 1971 [1959]). On the way to language.(P. D. Hertz, Tran.). San Francisco: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1996[1953]). Being and Time. (J. Stambaugh, Tran.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA:

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E., & Klausen, T. (1996). Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 15–34 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kordon, C. (1993). The language of the cell. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (1999). Beyond coherence. Management Communication Quarterly, 13 (1), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 264–280 ). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letter, K. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory, 2 (3), 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. & Simon, H.A. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen/Oslo/Tromso, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. & Weissinger–Baylon, R. (1986). Ambiguity and command: Organizational perspectives on military decision making. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1991). Science in daily life: The ontology of scientific explanations. In F. Steier (Ed.), Research and reflexivity: Self–reflexivity as a social process (pp. 30–52 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of understanding. Boston and London: Shambahla Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, J.D. & Reiley, A.C. (1931). Onward industry! New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (1958). Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redding, W. C. (1985). Stumbling toward identity: The emergence of organizational communication as a field of study. In R. D. McPhee & P. K. Tompkins, eds., Organizational communication: Traditional themes and new direc tions (pp. 15–54 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, P. (1995). Transforming work: collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 38 (9), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. L. Levine, & S.D.Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, (pp. 150–170 ). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts. London and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schockley-Zalabak, P., (1999). Protean places: Teams across time and place. Paper presented to the International Communication Association at its annual conference, held in San Francisco, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1996). Working together: Symbolic interactionism, activity theory, and information systems. In Y. Engestrôm & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 296–318 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1997). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer–Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal, 8 (1–2), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 39 (9), 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engestrôm & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 35–60 ). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L., & Trigg, R. H. (1991). Understanding practice: video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at work, (pp. 65–90 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. (1911). Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R. (1993). Rethinking the theory of organizational communication: How to read an organization. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R. (1995). Shifting from a heteronomous to an autonomous world- view of organizational communication: Communication theory on the cusp. Communication Theory, 15 (3), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R. & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R., Groleau, C., Heaton, L., & Van Every, E. J. (2001). The computerization of work: A communication perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R., Cooren, F., Giroux, N. & Robichaud, D. (1996). The communicational basis of organization: Between the conversation and the text. Communication Theory, 6 (1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, P. K. & Redding, W. C. (1988). Organizational communication: Past and present tenses. In G. G. Goldhaber & G. A. Barnett, Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 5–33 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. (1990). Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H., Grootendorst, R. & Henkemans, F.S. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J.H. & Jackson, D. (1967). The pragmatics of communication. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. ( 1968 [1923]). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, 3 vols. (Edited and with an introduction by G. Roth and C Wittich.) New York: Bedminster Press..

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations. In B. M. Staw & G. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior, (pp. 267– 300 ). Chicago: St. Clair.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MD: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1985). Sources of order in underorganized systems: Themes in recent organizational theory. In Y.S. Lincoln, ed., Organizational theory and inquiry (pp. 106–136 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K.E. & Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administation

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. ( 1921 [1921]). Tractatus logico-philosophicus (Pears, D. F. & McGuinness, B. F., Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. ( 1958 [1953]). Philosophical investigations: The English text of the third edition. (Anscombe, G.E.M., Trans.). London and New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Egbert Kahle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taylor, J.R. (2002). The “rational” organization reconsidered — An exploration of some of the organizational implications of selforganizing. In: Kahle, E. (eds) Organisatorische Veränderung und Corporate Governance. Entscheidungs- und Organisationstheorie. Deutscher Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81058-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81058-8_1

  • Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-0635-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-81058-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics