Firm Diversification and Financial Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Firms Worldwide

Chapter
Part of the The Academy of International Business book series (AIB)

Abstract

Product and international diversifications are both vital strategies for a firm. Our chapter aims to examine the joint effect of international and product diversification on firm performance, and to uncover what factors augment or weaken this joint effect on firm performance. Drawing on over 13,000 manufacturing firms in the period of 2004–2013, we found that the joint effect of international and product diversification on firm performance is negative. This negative effect tends to become stronger for firms in high-tech sectors, relative to firms in low-tech sectors. In addition, we found that this negative effect is weaker for developed country firms, compared to firms in emerging countries.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank for the valuable comments from Davide Castellani and the participants at Academy of International Business (UK and Ireland Chapter) in Reading, 6–8 April 2017, UK. We are responsible for any error that might yet remain.

References

  1. Annavarjula, M., Beldona, S., & Sadrieh, F. (2006). Corporate performance implications of multinationality. Journal of Transnational Management, 10(4), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bebenroth, R., & Hemmert, M. (2015). Country-level antecedents of target firms’ post-acquisition business performance: A study of inbound Japanese and Korean M&As. Asian Business & Management, 14(4), 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, J., McNaughton, R., & Young, S. (2001). ‘Born-again global’firms: An extension to the ‘born global’ phenomenon. Journal of International Management, 7(3), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen, H. P., Baker, H. K., & Powell, G. E. (2015). Globalization and diversification strategy: A managerial perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, H. P., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2017). Are international and product diversification substitutes or complements? Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Global Strategy Journal, 7(3), 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckley, P. J., & Strange, R. (2011). The governance of the multinational enterprise: Insights from internalization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 460–470.Google Scholar
  7. Bureau of Economic Analysis, US Department of Commerce. (1999). Methodologies for direct U.S. investment abroad. International direct investment studies by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  8. Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castellani, D., Montresor, S., Schubert, T., & Vezzani, A. (2017). Multinationality, R&D and productivity: Evidence from the top R&D investors worldwide. International Business Review, 26(3), 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2006). Multinational firms, innovation and productivity. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2007). Internationalisation, innovation and productivity: How do firms differ in Italy? The World Economy, 30(1), 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caves, R. E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Claessens, S., & Van Horen, N. (2012). Being a foreigner among domestic banks: Asset or liability? Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(5), 1276–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37(4), 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Contractor, F. J. (2007). Is international business good for companies? The evolutionary or multi-stage theory of internationalization vs. the transaction cost perspective. Management International Review, 47(3), 453–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies, S. W., Rondi, L., & Sembenelli, A. (2001). Are multinationality and diversification complementary or substitute strategies?: An empirical analysis on European leading firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(8), 1315–1346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Yost, K. (2002). Global diversification, industrial diversification, and firm value. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 1951–1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geringer, M. J., Beamish, P. W., & DaCosta, R. C. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geringer, M. J., Tallman, S., & Olsen, D. M. (2000). Product and international diversification among Japanese multinational firms. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hashai, N., & Delios, A. (2012). Balancing growth across geographic diversification and product diversification: A contingency approach. International Business Review, 21(6), 1052–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Himmelberg, C. P., & Petersen, B. C. (1994). R&D and internal finance: A panel study of small firms in high-tech industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1), 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.-L., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoechle, D., Schmid, M., Walter, I., & Yermack, D. (2012). How much of the diversification discount can be explained by poor corporate governance? Journal of Financial Economics, 103(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, G. R., & Hill, C. W. (1988). Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kistruck, G. M., Qureshi, I., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). Geographic and product diversification in charitable organizations. Journal of Management, 39(2), 496–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar, M. (2009). The relationship between product and international diversification: The effects of short-run constraints and endogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, L., & Qian, G. (2005). Dimensions of international diversification: Their joint effects on firm performance. Journal of Global Marketing, 18(3–4), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Love, J. H., & Ganotakis, P. (2013). Learning by exporting: Lessons from high-technology SMEs. International Business Review, 22(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Majocchi, A., & Strange, R. (2012). International diversification: The impact of ownership structure, the market for corporate control and board independence. Management International Review, 52(6), 879–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matraves, C., & Rodriguez, P. (2005). Profitability, diversification, and multinationality in leading German and UK firms. International Journal of Business and Economics, 4(2), 87–105.Google Scholar
  34. Mayer, M. C., Stadler, C., & Hautz, J. (2015). The relationship between product and international diversification: The role of experience. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1458–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer, K. E. (2006). Globalfocusing: From domestic conglomerates to global specialists. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1109–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Palich, L. E., Cardinal, L. B., & Miller, C. C. (2000). Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2), 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosen, S. (1990). Contracts and the market for executives: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER Working Paper No. 3542).Google Scholar
  38. Ruigrok, W., Amann, W., & Wagner, H. (2007). The internationalization-performance relationship at Swiss firms: A test of the S-shape and extreme degrees of internationalization. Management International Review, 47(3), 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sambharya, R. B. (1995). The combined effect of international diversification and product diversification strategies on the performance of US-based multinational corporations. Management International Review, 35(3), 197–218.Google Scholar
  40. Shama, A. (1993). Management under fire: The transformation of managers in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Academy of Management Executive, 7(1), 22–35.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, P. J. (2002). Patent rights and trade: Analysis of biological products, medicinals and botanicals, and pharmaceuticals. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(2), 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Svetličič, M., & Rojec, M. (1994). Foreign direct investment and the transformation of Central European economies. Management International Review, 34(4), 293–312.Google Scholar
  43. Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Teece, D. J. (1980). Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(3), 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiersema, M. F., & Bowen, H. P. (2008). Corporate diversification: The impact of foreign competition, industry globalization, and product diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 29(2), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang, Y., & Driffield, N. (2012). Multinationality-performance relationship. Management International Review, 52(1), 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang, Y., Martins, P. S., & Driffield, N. (2013). Multinational performance and the geography of FDI. Management International Review, 53(6), 763–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zahra, S. A. (1996). Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and ManagementUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations