Abstract
The primary goals of interactive learning environments (ILEs) are to improve student engagement and learning outcomes. In this paper, we examine different tablet-based user interaction strategies within the domain of analytical geometry (i.e., the intersection of algebra and geometry) that supports active learning for math problem solving. From a learning technology view, we ground our work using cognitive engagement theory and apply usability to evaluate and further infer user engagement by using different interaction metaphors. We propose two ILE features: (1) self-constructed graphing, which provides a Cartesian coordinate interface so that students can graph toward a solution and (2) system-generated graphing, where the ILE automatically translates written algebraic equations into their geometric equivalents. We recruited 24 college students and conducted a 2 × 2 mixed factorial experimental design by varying two levels (with & without) for each condition (self-constructed & system-generated graphing). We found that these two features combined optimally increased student engagement and solving performance. More importantly, letting students control multi-modal user interactions (given the self-constructed graphing feature) should be provided before introducing automated user interactions (given the system-generated graphing feature).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Moreno, R., Mayer, R.: Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19, 309–326 (2007)
Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.: Cognitive tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 249–255 (2007)
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., Willingham, D.T.: Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 14, 4–58 (2013)
Koedinger, K.R., Booth, J.L., Klahr, D.: Instructional complexity and the science to constrain it. Science 342, 935–937 (2013)
Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., Rohrbach, S.: Why interactive learning environments can have it all: resolving design conflicts between competing goals. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 109–118. ACM, New York (2013)
Henrie, C.R., Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R.: Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: a review. Comput. Educ. 90, 36–53 (2015)
Lim, C.P., Nonis, D., Hedberg, J.: Gaming in a 3D multiuser virtual environment: engaging students in science lessons. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 37, 211–231 (2006)
Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J.: Engaging with massive online courses. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 687–698. ACM (2014)
Guo, P.J., Kim, J., Rubin, R.: How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. In: Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale Conference, pp. 41–50. ACM, New York (2014)
Sabourin, J.L., Lester, J.C.: Affect and engagement in game-based learning environments. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5, 45–56 (2014)
Oviatt, S., Cohen, A., Miller, A., Hodge, K., Mann, A.: The impact of interface affordances on human ideation, problem solving, and inferential reasoning. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 19, 22 (2012)
Mavrikis, M., Grawemeyer, B., Hansen, A., Gutierrez-Santos, S.: Exploring the potential of speech recognition to support problem solving and reflection. In: Rensing, C., de Freitas, S., Ley, T., Muñoz-Merino, Pedro J. (eds.) EC-TEL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8719, pp. 263–276. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11200-8_20
Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., Wood, D.: Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. J. Learn. Sci. 11, 25–61 (2002)
Rau, M.A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N.: Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions. In: AIED, pp. 441–448 (2009)
Rau, M.A.: Enhancing undergraduate chemistry learning by helping students make connections among multiple graphical representations. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 16, 654–669 (2015)
Desmos|Beautiful, Free Math. https://www.desmos.com/
Rau, M.A., Michaelis, J.E., Fay, N.: Connection making between multiple graphical representations: a multi-methods approach for domain-specific grounding of an intelligent tutoring system for chemistry. Comput. Educ. 82, 460–485 (2015)
Brenner, M.E., Mayer, R.E., Moseley, B., Brar, T., Duran, R., Reed, B.S., Webb, D.: Learning by understanding: the role of multiple representations in learning algebra. Am. Educ. Res. J. 34, 663–689 (1997)
Zeleznik, R., Miller, T., Li, C., LaViola, Joseph J.: MathPaper: mathematical sketching with fluid support for interactive computation. In: Butz, A., Fisher, B., Krüger, A., Olivier, P., Christie, M. (eds.) SG 2008. LNCS, vol. 5166, pp. 20–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85412-8_3
Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49, 219–243 (2014)
Koedinger, K.R., Nathan, M.J.: The real story behind story problems: effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. J. Learn. Sci. 13, 129–164 (2004)
Kang, B., Kulshreshth, A., LaViola Jr., J.J.: AnalyticalInk: an interactive learning environment for math word problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 419–430. ACM (2016)
Kang, B., LaViola Jr., J.J., Wisniewski, P.: Structured input improves usability and precision for solving geometry-based algebraic problems. Presented at the (2017)
David Gustafson, R., Frisk, P.D.: Elementary Geometry, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester (1991)
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., Buchner, A.: G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Meth. 39, 175–191 (2007)
Lund, A.M.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface 8, 3–6 (2001)
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H., Van Gerven, P.W.: Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educ. Psychol. 38, 63–71 (2003)
Van Merriënboer, J.J., Ayres, P.: Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 53, 5–13 (2005)
Oviatt, S.: Human-centered design meets cognitive load theory: designing interfaces that help people think. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 871–880. ACM, New York (2006)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)
Huntley, M.A., Marcus, R., Kahan, J., Miller, J.L.: Investigating high-school students’ reasoning strategies when they solve linear equations. J. Math. Behav. 26, 115–139 (2007)
Mathan, Santosh A., Koedinger, Kenneth R.: An empirical assessment of comprehension fostering features in an intelligent tutoring system. In: Cerri, Stefano A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 330–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). doi:10.1007/3-540-47987-2_37
Grafsgaard, J.F., Wiggins, J.B., Vail, A.K., Boyer, K.E., Wiebe, E.N., Lester, J.C.: The additive value of multimodal features for predicting engagement, frustration, and learning during tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 42–49. ACM (2014)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by NSF Award IIS-1638060, Lockheed Martin, Office of Naval Research Award ONRBAA15001, Army RDECOM Award W911QX13C0052, and Coda Enterprises, LLC. We thank the ISUE lab members at UCF for their support as well as the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kang, B., LaViola, J.J., Wisniewski, P. (2017). Examining Interaction Modality Effects Toward Engagement in an Interactive Learning Environment. In: Lavoué, É., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., Broisin, J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M. (eds) Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66609-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66610-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)