Abstract
Whether brand gender is an obvious consequence of product gender is discussed in this chapter The brand–gender concept could be obsolete if it directly follows the gender of a specific product category. For example, since cars are a “men’s thing,” it could be trivial to argue that a car brand is masculine. However, it has been argued that even within a masculine product category (e.g., cars), brand gender can vary (e.g., the French Citroen DS was perceived as somewhat feminine). In this chapter, fictitious brands were created with different brand names and logos and then assigned to 16 product groups. The logos, product categories, and brand genders were separately assessed and then compared. Both logo and product gender determined brand gender. The results of this study supported the assumption that brands have a gender and that this gender is not predetermined solely by product category. Although product categories contribute to perceived gender by building gender classes, brand genders themselves vary significantly within these classes, such that a brand within a masculine product category may be perceived as more feminine than a brand within a feminine product category. The equities of the fictitious brands were assessed in a later study. The results provide evidence that equity can be directly derived from a brand’s logo gender and product gender. They also emphasize the prominent role gender plays in the brand management process, while showing that all brand aspects contribute to and reinforce brand gender independently. Finally, the results demonstrate the superiority of androgyny.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aaker, David A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity—Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.
Aiken, Leona S., and Stephen G. West. 1991. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Bem, Sandra L. 1974. The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42 (2): 155–162. doi:10.1037/h0036215.
Brady, Michael K., J. Joseph Cronin Jr., Gavin L. Fox, and Michelle L. Roehm. 2008. Strategies to offset performance failures: The role of brand equity. Journal of Retailing 84 (2): 151–164. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.002.
———. 1977. On the Utility of Alternative Procedures for Assessing Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 45 (2): 196–205. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.45.2.196.
Childers, Terry L., and Jeffrey Jass. 2002. All Dressed Up With Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Associations on Brand Perceptions and Consumer Memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology 12 (2): 93–106. doi:10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_03.
Grohmann, Bianca. 2009. Gender Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research 46 (1): 105–119. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.1.105.
Keller, Kevin Lane. 1993. Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 1–22. doi:10.2307/1252054.
Klink, Richard R. 2000. Creating Brand Names with Meaning: The Use of Sound Symbolism. Marketing Letters 11 (1): 5–20. doi:10.2307/40216555.
Lieven, Theo, Bianca Grohmann, Andreas Herrmann, Jan R. Landwehr, and Miriam Van Tilburg. 2015. The Effect of Brand Design on Brand Gender Perceptions and Brand Preference. European Journal of Marketing 49 (12): 146–169. doi:10.1108/EJM-08-2012-0456.
Miyazaki, Anthony D., Dhruv Grewal, and Ronald C. Goodstein. 2005. The Effect of Multiple Extrinsic Cues on Quality Perceptions: A Matter of Consistency. Journal of Consumer Research 32 (1): 146–153. doi:10.1086/429606.
Picariello, M.L., D.N. Greenberg, and D.B. Pillemer. 1990. Children’s Sex-Related Stereotyping of Colors. Child Development 61 (5): 1453–1460. doi:10.2307/1130755.
Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
Shaikh, A.D., B.S. Chaparro, and D. Fox. 2006. Perception on Fonts: Perceived Personality Traits and Uses. Usability News 8 (1): 1–6.
Spence, Janet T., Robert Helmreich, and Joy Stapp. 1975. Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attributes and Their Relation to Self-Esteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (1): 29–39. doi:10.1037/h0076857.
Uzzell, David, and Nathalie Horne. 2006. The Influence of Biological Sex, Sexuality and Gender Role on Interpersonal Distance. The British Journal of Social Psychology/The British Psychological Society 45 (Pt 3): 579–597. doi:10.1348/014466605X58384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lieven, T. (2018). The Independent Gender Effects of Logo, Product, and Brand. In: Brand Gender. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60219-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60219-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60218-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60219-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)