Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Foundations of Action by the Company and in the Company

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Management

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 672 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter dwells on these aspects, which are as important in word as they are often overlooked in fact. We will focus on some questions debated even in the most recent managerial theories in strategic settings and in human capital management.

He who loves practice without theory is like the sailor who boards ship without a rudder and compass and never knows where he may cast. (Leonardo da Vinci)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/, s.v. “knowledge.”

  2. 2.

    For further information see Vassallo (2006).

  3. 3.

    It is clear that if organizations are systems of people who work together to reach shared goals, there is no doubt that, at least at first glance, a “reciprocally instrumental” dimension, so to speak, can be observed, but this dimension must have a functional rather than an existential sense. For example, there can be an interest on the part of a company’s employees that the owner or manager (or vice versa, any co-worker) perform at their best in carrying out a specific task, because doing so is to the advantage of the entire organization and all the individuals who comprise it. If however one approaches that owner, manager, or co-worker for other than the relationship itself, but rather is motivated by merely functional or even instrumental interest, once that is understood it will end up damaging the relationship; worse yet, sharply limiting the breadth and depth of the relationship, reducing its potential by emptying it of meaning and transforming it from an interpersonal relationship to a social interaction, can, in extreme instances, lead to separation or even social conflict.

References

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1984). Implanting strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27, 625–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future. Journal of Management 36(1), 256–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, R. (2006). Building a values-driven organization. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boi, T. (2009). L’intelligenza sociale. Verso una teoria relazionale dell’intelligenza nel quadro della pedagogia di comunione. Nuova Umanità 181(1), 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N. (1996). There’s a price on your head: Managing intellectual capital strategically. Business Quarterly 60, 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J. (2002). Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies 39, 437–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual capital. Core asset for the third millennium enterprise. London: International Thompson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabiddu, F., & Di Guardo, M. C. (2013). Does strategy have a say in times of technological change? In B. Ran (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on technological innovations, management, and policy, the dark side of technological innovation, II (pp. 53–80). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrita, M. R., & Bontis, N. (2008). Intellectual capital and business performance in the Portuguese banking industry. International Journal of Technology Management 43, 212–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarthy, B. (1997). A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Management Review 38(2), 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coda, V. (2012). Il bene dell’impresa, bussola per i comportamenti responsabili. In V. Coda, M. Minoja, A. Tessitore, & M. Vitale (Eds.), Valori d’impresa in azione. Milan: Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coda, V., Minoja, M., Tessitore, A., & Vitale, M. (Eds.). (2012). Valori d’impresa in azione. Milan: Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M. (1992). È vincente l’impresa che impara ad ascoltare. Interview by M. Libelli. L’Impresa 2, 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, A., & Kretschmer, M. (2007). Can ideas be capital? Factors of production in the postindustrial economy: A review and critique. Academy of Management Review 32, 573–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management science 35(12), 1504–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzinkowsky, R. (2000). The measurement and management of intellectual capital: An introduction. Management Accounting 77, 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2002). Managing in the next society. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital. The proven way to establish your company’s real value by measuring Its hidden brainpower. London: Piatkus Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. J. (1996). Research in strategy, economics, and Michael Porter. Journal of Management Studies 33, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1969). The consequences of technology. Journal of Accountancy 127, 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2004). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, E. (1997). I mutamenti nelle relazioni impresa-ambiente. Milan: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. (1999). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. In M. H. Zack (Ed.), Knowledge and strategy. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulotta, G., & Boi, T. (1997). L’intelligenza sociale. Milan: Giuffrè.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35, 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, M. C., & Kram, K. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(2), 264–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormiga, E., Batista-Catino, R. M., & Sánchez-Medina, A. (2011). The impact of relational capital on the success of new business start-ups. Journal of Small Business Management 49(4), 617–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, Y. H., & Fang, W. (2009). Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76(5), 664–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M. (2011). I neuroni specchio. Come capiamo ciò che fanno gli altri. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, E. (2010). Intellectual capital management enablers: A structural equation modeling analysis. Journal of Business Ethics 93(3), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennick, D., & Kiel, F. (2005). Moral intelligence: Enhancing business performance and leadership success. Philadelphia: Wharton Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-de-Castro, G., Delgado-Verde, M., Lopez-Saez, P., & Navas-Lopez, J. E. (2011). Towards ‘an intellectual capital based view of the firm’: Origins and nature. Journal of Business Ethics 98, 649–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1992). L’albero della conoscenza. Milan: Garzanti. (Originally published as El árbol del conocimiento. Santiago: Ed. Universitaria, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (1993). Introduzione al pensiero complesso. Milan: Sperling & Kupfer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (1994). Terra patria. Milan: Raffaello Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T., & Waterman, R., Jr. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Sperling & Kupfer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prini, P., & Sacchi, D. (2006). Conoscenza. In Enciclopedia Filosofica. Milan: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, K. K., Lubatkin, M., & Srinivasan, N. (2006). Proposing and testing an intellectual capital-base view of the firm. Journal of Management Studies 43, 867–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rullani, E. (2004). Economia della conoscenza. Creatività e valore nel capitalismo delle reti. Rome: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 9(3), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G., & Kliesch-Eberl, M. (2007). How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization. Strategic Management Journal 28(9), 913–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1989). The theory of business strategy. RAND Journal of Economics 20, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J.-C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. S. (1997). Intellectual capital. The new wealth of organizations. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48, 450–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how and intangible assets. California Management Review 40, 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2000). Managing intellectual capital. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatchenkery, T., & Metzker, C. (2006). Appreciative intelligence: Seeing the mighty oak in the acorn. San Francisco: Berrett-Koheler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Marrewijk, M., & Timmers, J. (2003). Human capital management: New possibilities in people management. Journal of Business Ethics 44(2–3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo, N. (2006). Teoria della Conoscenza. In Enciclopedia Filosofica. Milan: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Ahmed, P. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9, 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991a). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal 12, 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1991b). Introduction. In O. E. Williamson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm. Origins, evolution, and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics and Management, Sophia University Institute, Figline e Incisa Valdarno, Firenze, Italy

    Giuseppe Argiolas

Authors
  1. Giuseppe Argiolas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Argiolas, G. (2017). The Foundations of Action by the Company and in the Company. In: Social Management. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54582-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation