Abstract
Increasingly, organizations are aware that the knowledge generated in the organization over time is a primary factor to remain competitive in the market. This leads organizations to seek strategies that preserve this knowledge generated over time and create mechanisms to encourage its employees to use part of this accumulated knowledge, in the generation of innovative products and strategies, on solving problems as well as in decision-making. In this potentiating process, the Organizational Memory (OM) comes in the interim as a way of conceptualizing how is this process of creation, storage and dissemination of knowledge in the organization over time and how the knowledge accumulated by members of an organization can influence the actions and decisions, both in the present and the future of the organization. For this development of OM to be effective and harmonious, it is necessary that the attention of individuals to be targeted and aligned, noticing the stimuli from the environment, and directing organizational time and cognitive effort towards the decisions to be made in the organization. In this scenario, in an attempt to improve our understanding of theoretical concepts taking into account the influence of Social Media in organizations, we raise the following question: How Social Media can be used to guide the attention of decision makers towards better creation, storage, dissemination and application of knowledge in the organization? Therefore this research is an important first step to understand the potential of Social Media in the organizational setting as a means of focusing the attention of policy makers on the development of OM. Adopting an interpretative approach to the literature review, the paper provides a discussion of 22 case studies found in the literature that were analyzed using the Attention-Based View of the Firm as a guiding lens. This analysis shows some evidence and relevant implications of the use of Social Media in the organizational context as well as a first theoretical description of how the focus of attention of decision makers influence the development of OM.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Everson, M., Gundlach, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Social media and the introductory statistics course. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A69–A81.
Ramos, I. (2011). Organizational memory : A neuroscience-based comprehensive model. In Proceedings of the 7th organization science winter conference (OSWC-XVII) on organizational memory (pp. 1–5).
Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., & Wilson, R. A. (2008). A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1), 33–51.
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2003). Organisational memory, knowledge sharing, learning and innovation: An integrated model. Telford, Shropshire, WP006/03.
Kim, N., Im, S., & Slater, S. F. (2013). Impact of knowledge type and strategic orientation on new product creativity and advantage in high-technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 136–153.
Olivera, F. (2000). Memory systems in organizations: an empirical investigation of mechanisms for knowledge collection, storage and access. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 811–832.
Hamid, N. A. A., & Salim, J. (2010). Exploring the role of transactive memory system (TMS) for knowledge transfer processes in Malaysia E-government IT outsourcing. In International conference on information retrieval & knowledge management, CAMP’2010 (pp. 303–309).
Dorasamy, M., Raman, M., & Kaliannan, M. (2013). Knowledge management systems in support of disasters management : A two decade review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 20.
Allahawiah, S., Al-Mobaideen, H., & Al Nawaiseh, K. (2012). The impact of information technology on knowledge management processes—An empirical study in the Arab Potash Company. International Business Review, 6(1), 235–252.
Toulabi, Z., Dehghani, M., & Al Taha, H. R. (2012). A survey of the relationship between organizational memory and organizational learning in public organizations of Kerman. International Business Review, 6(1), 90–96.
McCaughey, D., & Bruning, N. S. (2010). Rationality versus reality: The challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers. Implementation Science, 5, 39.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V. (1995). Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 85–117.
Ackerman, M. S. (1994). Augmenting organizational memory: A field study of answer garden. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work, CSCW-94 (pp. 243–252).
Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kühn, O., & Sintek, M. (1998). Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 40–48.
Chang, D. R., & Cho, H. (2008). Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 13–23.
Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91.
Rowlinson, M., Booth, C., Clark, P., Delahaye, A., & Procter, S. (2010). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(1), 69–87.
Barros, V. F. A., & Ramos, I. (2015). Using social media as organizational memory consolidation mechanism according to attention based view theory. In Proceedings of the twenty-first Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS (pp. 1–22).
Huang, J., Baptista, J., & Galliers, R. D. (2013). Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: The impact of social media on internal communications. Information & Management, 50(2–3), 112–124.
Böhringer, M., Richter, A., & Koch, M. (2009). Awareness 2.0—Ein Anwenderbeispiel von Microblogging im Unternehmen. Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 60, 275–279.
Bughin, J., Byers, A. H., & Chui, M. (2011). How social technologies are extending the organization. McKinsey Quarterly, 1–10.
Smith, S., & Harwood, P. (2011). Social media and its impact on employers and trade unions.
King, K. P. (2011). Professional learning in unlikely spaces: Social media and virtual communities as professional development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 6(4), 40–46.
Kohler, T., Fueller, J., Matzler, K., & Stieger, D. (2011). Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 773–788.
McAfee, A. P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 20–29.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
Duane, A., & Finnegan, P. (2003). Managing empowerment and control in an intranet environment. Information Systems Journal, 12, 133–158.
Hanna, R., Rohm, A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2011). We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265–273.
Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business Horizons, 54(3), 193–207.
Jackson, A., Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2007). Corporate blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. In 40th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1–10).
Davenport, T. H. (2011). Rethinking knowledge work: A strategic approach. McKinsey Quarterly, 1–11.
Balayeva, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2009). Virtual office hours as cyberinfrastructure: The case study of instant messaging. Learning Inquiry, 3(3), 115–130.
Berkovich, I. (2011). No we won’t! Teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563–578.
Hatakka, M., Andersson, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Students’ use of one to one laptops: A capability approach analysis. Information Technology & People, 26(1), 94–112.
Hargreaves, T. (2011). Pro-environmental interaction: Engaging Goffman on pro-environmental behaviour change. Working Papers, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, 1, 1–20.
Lantz-Andersson, A., Vigmo, S., & Bowen, R. (2013). Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 293–312.
LaRue, E. M. (2012). Using Facebook as course management software: A case study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 7(1), 17–22.
Mackness, J., Waite, M., Roberts, G., & Lovegrove, E. (2013). Learning in a small, task-oriented, connectivist MOOC: Pedagogical issues and implications for higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4), 140–159.
Menkhoff, T., & Bengtsson, M. L. (2012). Engaging students in higher education through mobile learning: Lessons learnt in a Chinese entrepreneurship course. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(3), 225–242.
Nández, G., & Borrego, A. (2013). Use of social networks for academic purposes: A case study. Electron Libre, 31(6), 781–791.
Potter, J., & Banaji, S. (2012). Social media and self-curatorship: Reflections on identity and pedagogy through blogging on a masters module. Comunicar, 19(38), 83–91.
Schejter, A. M., & Tirosh, N. (2012). Social media new and old in the Al-’Arakeeb conflict: A case study. The Information Society, 28(5), 304–315.
Zhang, D., & Yue, W. T. (2013). Big data and social media use in commerce, work, and social life. Decision Support Systems, 7–8.
Wikström, P., & Ellonen, H.-K. (2012). The impact of social media features on print media firms’ online business models. Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(3), 63–80.
Culnan, M. J., McHugh, P. J., & Zubillaga, J. I. (2010). How large U.S. companies can use twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 243–259.
Shirazi, F. (2013). Social media and the social movements in the Middle East and North Africa: A critical discourse analysis. Information Technology & People, 26(1), 28–49.
Unsworth, K., & Townes, A. (2012). Social media and E-Government: A case study assessing Twitter use in the implementation of the open government directive. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–3.
Cai, K., Spangler, S., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2008). Leveraging sentiment analysis for topic detection. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, 265–271.
Chauhan, K., & Pillai, A. (2013). Role of content strategy in social media brand communities: A case of higher education institutes in India. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(1), 40–51.
Hopkins, J. L. (2012). Can Facebook be an effective mechanism for generating growth and value in small businesses? Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(2), 131–141.
O’Shea, M., & Alonso, A. D. (2013). Fan moderation of professional sports organisations’ social media content: Strategic brilliance or pending disaster? International Journal of Web Based Communities, 9(4), 554–570.
O’Shea, M., & Alonso, A. D. (2011). Opportunity or obstacle? A preliminary study of professional sport organisations in the age of social media. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 10(3–4), 196–212.
Bernardo, T. M., Rajic, A., Young, I., Robiadek, K., Pham, M. T., & Funk, J. A. (2013). Scoping review on search queries and social media for disease surveillance: A chronology of innovation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(7), e147.
Vicari, S. (2013). Public reasoning around social contention: A case study of Twitter use in the Italian mobilization for global change. Current Sociology, 61(4), 474–490.
Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social media and the arab spring: Politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137.
Holmberg, T. (2013). Trans-species urban politics: Stories from a beach. SP Culture, 16(1), 28–42.
Hvass, K. A. (2013). Tourism social media and crisis communication: An erupting trend. Tourism Social Science Series, 18, 177–191.
Luoma-aho, V., Tirkkonen, P., & Vos, M. (2013). Monitoring the issue arenas of the swine-flu discussion. Journal of Communication Management, 17(3), 239–251.
Martyn, H., & Gallant, L. M. (2012). Over 50 and wired: Web-based stakeholder communication. First Monday, 17(6).
Näkki, P., Bäck, A., Ropponen, T., Kronqvist, J., Hintikka, K. A., Harju, A., et al. (2011). Social media for citizen participation report on the somus project. VTT Publications, 755, 1–131.
Schwarz, A. (2012). How publics use social media to respond to blame games in crisis communication: The love parade tragedy in Duisburg 2010. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 430–437.
Segaard, S. B., & Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Local election blogs: Networking among the political elite. Information Polity, 18(4), 299–313.
Tufekci, Z. (2013). ‘Not this one’: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870.
Sykora, M. (2011). Web 2.0: Common uses and potential applications: An interdisciplinary study of social media with case studies of applications and some methodology improvements. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(10), 411–450.
Stocker, A., & Mayer, H. (2012). Unternehmen und soziale Medien—wie passt das zusammen? [Enterprises and social media—How to get this to work?]. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 129(2), 72–75.
Chua, A. Y. K., & Banerjee, S. (2013). Customer knowledge management via social media: The case of Starbucks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 237–249.
Bygstad, B., & Presthus, W. (2013). Social media as CRM? How two airline companies used facebook during the ‘ash crisis’ in 2010. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 51–71.
Betton, V., & Tomlinson, V. (2013). Social media can help in recovery—But are mental health practitioners up to speed? Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 17(4), 215–219.
Gupta, A., Tyagi, M., & Sharma, D. (2013). Use of social media marketing in healthcare. Journal of Health Management, 15(2), 293–302.
Mitra, S., & Padman, R. (2012). Privacy and security concerns in adopting social media for personal health management: A health plan case study. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 14(4), 12–26.
Neiger, B. L., Thackeray, R., Burton, S. H., Giraud-Carrier, C. G., & Fagen, M. C. (2013). Evaluating social media’s capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: Use of Twitter metrics as a case study. Health Promotion Practice, 14(2), 157–162.
Lugmayr, A. (2013). Brief introduction into information systems & management research in media industries. In 2013 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo workshops (ICMEW) (pp. 1–6).
Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 6–13.
Yates, D., Wagner, C., & Majchrzak, A. (2010). Factors affecting shapers of organizational wikis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 543–554.
Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
Metter, E., Gyster, V., Lamson, R., & Perrin, T. (2008). Enterprise 2.0 and HR: realizing the potential. IHRIM Journal, 12(5), 3–8.
Larcker, D. F., Larcker, S. M., & Tayan, B. (2012). What do corporate directors and senior managers know about social media? In The conference board. trusted insights for business worldwide (p. 15).
Scott, P. R., & Jacka, J. M. (2011). Auditing social media: A governance and risk guide. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ala-Mutka, K. (2008). Social computing: Study on the use and impacts of collaborative content. Seville, Spain, EUR 23572 EN.
Anderson, E. (2010). Social media marketing: game theory and the emergence of collaboration. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Lugmayr, A. (2013). Issues & approach in defining a european research agenda on information systems and management in creative eMedia industries. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on defining a european research agenda on information systems and management in eMedia industries, 2013, (pp. 17–25).
Meyer, M. H., & Marion, T. J. (2013). Preserving the integrity of knowledge and information in R&D. Business Horizons, 56(1), 51–61.
Barros, V. F. A., Ramos, I., & Perez, G. (2015). Information systems and organizational memory: A literature review. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(1), 45–64.
Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Sánchez-Polo, M. T. (2011). Influence of the open-mindedness culture on organizational memory: An empirical investigation of Spanish SMEs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 1–18.
Hofmann, D. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (1999). Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 286–296.
Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 125–133.
Coman, A., Brown, A. D., Koppel, J., & Hirst, W. (2009). Collective memory from a psychological perspective. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 125–141.
Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008). Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory, 16(3), 183–200.
Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting (Vol. 225). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ackerman, M. S., & Halverson, C. (2004). Organizational memory as objects, processes, and trajectories: An examination of organizational memory in use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13(2), 155–189.
Lehner, F., & Maier, R. K. (2000). How can organizational memory theories contribute to organizational memory systems? Information Systems Frontiers, 2(3/4), 277–298.
Casey, A., & Olivera, F. (2003). Learning from the past: A review of the organizational memory literature. In The proceedings of organizational learning and knowledge, 5th international conference (pp. 1–27).
Nevo, D., Furneaux, B., & Wand, Y. (2008). Towards an evolution framework for knowledge management systems. Information Technology and Management, 9(4), 233–249.
Baddeley, A. D., Eysenck, M., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. Hove: Psychology Press.
Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467–498.
Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65–83.
Ramos, I., & Levine, L. (2012). Organizational memory : A preliminary model based on insights from neuroscience. In Gmunden retreat on NeuroIS 2012 proceedings.
Javadi, E., Mahoney, J., & Gebauer, J. (2013). The impact of user interface design on idea integration in electronic brainstorming: An attention-based view. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(1), 1–21.
Briggs, R. O. (2004). On theory-driven design of collaboration technology and process. In G.-J. de Vreede, L. A. Guerrero, & G. M. Raventós (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use (pp. 1–15). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
de Vreede, G.-J., & Dickson, G. W. (2000). Using GSS to design organizational processes and information systems: An action research study on collaborative business engineering. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9(2000), 161–183.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special), 187–206.
Ekelund, L., & Räisänen, C. (2011). Re-organizing for innovation: Top management attention as a driver of strategic renewal. In International society for professional innovation management symposium, XXII ISPIM’2011.
Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 384–416.
Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. (2008). Rise and fall—or transformation? The evolution of strategic planning at the general electric company, 1940–2006. Long Range Planning, 41(3), 248–272.
Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1–40.
Sullivan, B. N. (2010). Competition and beyond: problems and attention allocation in the organizational rulemaking process. Organization Science, 21(2), 432–450.
Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.
Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287–306.
Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414–434.
Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 170–227.
Kaplan, S. (2008). Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 672–695.
Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009). Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science, 20(2), 461–477.
Barnett, M. L. (2008). An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 606–628.
Levy, O. (2005). The influence of top management team attention patterns on global strategic posture of firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 797–819.
Jacobides, M. G. (2007). The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 18(3), 455–477.
Marcel, J. J., Barr, P. S., & Duhaime, I. M. (2011). The influence of executive cognition on competitive dynamics. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 115–138.
Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21(4), 823–841.
Yuan, Y. C., Zhao, X., Liao, Q., & Chi, C. (2013). The use of different information and communication technologies to support knowledge sharing in organizations: From e-mail to micro-blogging. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1659–1670.
Zorn, T. E., Grant, S., & Henderson, A. (2013). Strengthening resource mobilization chains: Developing the social media competencies of community and voluntary organizations in New Zealand. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(3), 666–687.
Hauptmann, S., & Steger, T. (2013). ‘A brave new (Digital) world’? Effects of in-house social media on HRM [‘A brave new (Digital) world’? Konsequenzen von in-house Social Media für das Personalmanagement]. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 27(1), 26–46.
Denskus, T., & Papan, A. S. (2013). Reflexive engagements: The international development blogging evolution and its challenges [Engagements basés sur la réflexion: L’évolution des blogs consacrés au développement international et les défis qu’elle présente]. Development in Practice, 23(4), 455–467.
Candance Deans, P. (2011). The impact of social media on C-level roles. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(4), 187–200.
Annabi, H., & McGann, S. T. (2013). Social media as the missing link: Connecting communities of practice to business strategy. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 23(1–2), 56–83.
Fernando, I. (2010). Community creation by means of a social media paradigm. The Learning Organization, 17(6), 500–514.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil and by FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology within the Project Scope UID/CEC/00319/2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Positive Actions Applied or Expected with Implantation and Use of the Social Media in Organizations Cited in Case Studies Selected
Appendix: Positive Actions Applied or Expected with Implantation and Use of the Social Media in Organizations Cited in Case Studies Selected
COD | Positive actions analyzed—applied or expected—with implantation and use of the social media in organizations | Memory | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SS | CM | CL | PL | |||
Attention focus | ||||||
T01 | Provide a confidence feeling among other members of the organizations assuring a higher involvement with all members of the organizations | “[…] social media are more effective in addressing the three knowledge-sharing challenges revealed in behavioral research: (a) they help increase employees’ awareness of each other’s expertise and personal interests; (b) they can motivate contribution through frequent, timely feedback and through soliciting reciprocal exchange; and (c) they can better support the development and maintenance of social capital” [120, p. 1667] | X | |||
“While access to technical support and training will assist with developing members’ skills, capabilities and confidence, a critical success factor appears to be the need for someone within Parent Support to ‘champion’ social media developments, that is, to mobilize the chain of resources. In both organizations, having someone to oversee planning and provide a sense of continuity amid frequent turnover of volunteers and staff will greatly improve the chances of achieving improved communication through social media” [121, p. 685] | ||||||
T02 | Change the view of each organization’s member as to share of information, influencing directly on behavior, attention and involvement of the individual in the organization | “One important reason why I am motivated to share on social media is that I could increase my visibility in the organization by interacting with others on the platform. For example, some worldwide colleagues who I don’t work with can recognize me by following my blog” [120, p. 1665] | X | |||
“There are a growing number of domain experts, project managers and community leaders who have been using blogs and wikis to position themselves as an active voice in the organization, across regions and functions. As stated by one of the users (a team leader), we have ‘a very active blogosphere … some teams are spread all over the world and use wikis to work collaboratively’” [20, p. 117] | ||||||
T03 | Motivate and stimulate the initiative by own members in sharing information and making decisions in the organization individually/collectively | “Hence, this kind of low-level communication strengthens the aspect of sociability that is important for collaborative work such as co-creation and contributes to knowledge sharing without the need to be involved in long-lasting conversations” [122, p. 38] | X | |||
“[…] a recent on-going discussion on the intranet has focused on organizational restructuring, with messages from senior management, project leaders and employees, all of whom are interested in voicing their concerns and suggestions” [20, p. 117] | ||||||
“[…] more than half of internal social media users interviewed think the increased social capital associated with social media use increases their motivation for sharing expertise with one another” [120, p. 1664] | ||||||
T04 | Become herself/himself available and open to transmit details of the rationale process behind each decision in the organization in order to re-use that knowledge in the organization | “By examining screenshots (for anonymity they are omitted from this paper), it became evident that some of the senior managers have used their blogs to outline the rationale behind some of their decisions (for instance, to enter a new market in South America or the selection of a new venturing partner)” [20, p. 117] | X | |||
“Blogs can help to focus an individual’s own thinking about his/her work, providing an additional tool for reflective practice. In addition to the individual focus, publishing this thinking on a blog makes one’s thinking easier to share and can lend itself to creating a small ‘community of practice’ if others comment on the author’s posts […]” [123, p. 458] | ||||||
Situation of the attention | ||||||
T05 | Provide the share of ideas, information and experiences among the members freely and with no barriers, no great interventions, no hierarchy or sectorization, so that to generate an environment suitable for discussion of the problems and concerns in the organization, for the exchange of information in order to suggest solutions and propose innovation | “All news stories can be commented upon and rated. There’s no censoring at all. People are very happy to comment and have very candid comments, which is very good.” [20, p. 117] | X | X | ||
“Encouraging open and free participation with little or no intervention has become an important governance principle; one that has been gradually established and accepted by organizational members, many of whom are actively engaged in rhetorical practices” [20, p. 117] | ||||||
T06 | Ensure the position of the professional as active voice in the organization, in all sectors and functions, providing higher valorization of this professional in the organization | “One important reason why I am motivated to share on social media is that I could increase my visibility in the organization by interacting with others on the platform. For example, some worldwide colleagues who I don’t work with can recognize me by following my blog” [120, p. 1665] | X | |||
“Because I blog about the issues that I’m thinking about and dealing with in the course of my everyday job, I’m able to gain a wide spectrum of input and perspective on those issues, whether via comments on my posts, posts on other blogs that ‘riff’ off of mine, or—again—twitter conversations spun off of those same blog posts […]” [123, p. 458] | ||||||
T07 | Provide improvements in communication and share of information both in the external and the internal environment to organization, so that to provide greater information global reach and to stimulate interactivity among the organization’s individuals | “The CIO and CMO jointly are accountable for social media strategy and implementation. Performance evaluations, compensation and incentives are based on mutual performance and deliverance of shared objectives and goals. The social media goals and objectives of marketing are aligned with other organizational social media objectives through IT” [124, p. 193] | X | X | X | |
T08 | Guarantee the follow up permanent of views, suggestions and comments exposed from responsible professionals in the organization | “Our findings suggest that the use of social media had become part of the social fabric of BX. Blogs, wikis and commenting were no longer a novelty and are accepted as a normal feature of the intranet by employees. Open and participative communication is the default mode of BX’s communication culture, and is representative of a shift in the role of employees from ‘audience’ to active ‘rhetors’ in the organization’s on-line environment. Monitoring feedback and engaging in discussions regarding certain strategies and decisions is now a feature of the day-to-day life of senior management” [20, p. 119] | X | |||
Structured distribution of the attention | ||||||
T09 | Disseminate the organization’s values simply and integrate such values to actions and decisions in the organization | “In this context, DX’s intranet is perceived as the most important medium for internal communication, not just because of its wide reach globally, but also because of its capacity to broadcast a unified voice to communicate and reinforce corporate values and strategy” [20, p. 118] | X | |||
T10 | Facilitate better adaptation, whether by training, handbooks and guidelines, in effective use of the technologies adopted by part of the organization in order to make easy the organization’s internal and external communication | “Organizations must provide training and role definition that maintains a balance between autonomy, flexibility, and the identified responsibilities and expectations” [125, p. 78] | X | X | X? | |
T11 | Produce new organizational structures and models considered useful for the making-decision from the permanent follow-up of the views, suggestions, problems and comments exposed by the organization | “From looking at maps that others had generated from Google Maps and posted online the author created a method for displaying the information geographically instead of in a table” [74, p. 10] | X | X | ||
“With wikis in place, CoP leadership will have access to training materials, organizational CoP standards, templates, and best practices in order to be truly prepared and empowered by the organization to lead his or her CoP. Providing this space for CoP leaders to post information on salient issues and building on each other’s experiences and knowledge, is an important step in the continuity of training and role definition for future leaders and members of CoP” [125, p. 78] | ||||||
T12 | Generate changes in the processes, strategies, routines and culture of the organization so that such changes can lead in effective restructuring, alignment and adequacy of the communication and share of information in the organization | “Specifically, we see a highly vibrant landscape where social media has been incorporated extensively into NX’s organizational communication, and embedded in its day-to-day functioning.” [20, p. 118] | X | X | ||
“Social media adoption is less about the tools but rather the strategies and the attitudes of the people and the community driving it. Part of the objective of the BlueBI Campaign is to develop a coherent platform which can be used to nurture a community” [126, p. 508] | ||||||
“Implementing the guidelines using SM has implications for resource allocation and change in organizational culture. Organizations must allocate the appropriate resources for training and support of these communities. Perhaps most noteworthy is the change in culture required at all levels of the organization. Upper management and its employees must change perceptions of the role of the CoP and their importance to the organization. Striking a balance between alignment with organization structure and strategy as well as the emergent and informal nature of the CoP is also essential” [125, p. 79] | ||||||
T13 | Strengthening of organizational standards in order to allow an open, bidirectional and interactive communication | “Clear guidelines should be provided to help employees handle the “sticky” aspects of earlier tools. In the absence of such guidelines, employees may go in different directions, which may create more difficulties for knowledge sharing” [120, p. 1667] | X | |||
“Creating and maintaining norms that promoted engagement seems to have played a significant role in encouraging employees to establish two-way communication in this organization. Interactivity is enabled by a sense of openness of communication that is unconstrained by hierarchy […]” [20, p. 117] | ||||||
T14 | Ensure a positive and functional corporative image, increasing the reputation not only of the organization, but also their employees | “[…] the internal social media platform makes it so easy to share” [120, p. 1665] | X | |||
“Some of these blogs have received extensive comment from employees, ranging from the positive to the extremely negative. Some request clarification regarding, or even questioning, NX’s strategy moving forward. What is insightful is the amount of effort that the various bloggers spend in responding to comments and concerns” [20, p. 117] |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barros, V.F.A., Ramos, I. (2016). Using Social Media as a Mechanism to Consolidate the Organizational Memory—Insights from the Attention Based View of the Firm Theory. In: Lugmayr, A., Stojmenova, E., Stanoevska, K., Wellington, R. (eds) Information Systems and Management in Media and Entertainment Industries. International Series on Computer Entertainment and Media Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49407-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49407-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49405-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49407-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)