Skip to main content

Using Social Media as a Mechanism to Consolidate the Organizational Memory—Insights from the Attention Based View of the Firm Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Management in Media and Entertainment Industries

Abstract

Increasingly, organizations are aware that the knowledge generated in the organization over time is a primary factor to remain competitive in the market. This leads organizations to seek strategies that preserve this knowledge generated over time and create mechanisms to encourage its employees to use part of this accumulated knowledge, in the generation of innovative products and strategies, on solving problems as well as in decision-making. In this potentiating process, the Organizational Memory (OM) comes in the interim as a way of conceptualizing how is this process of creation, storage and dissemination of knowledge in the organization over time and how the knowledge accumulated by members of an organization can influence the actions and decisions, both in the present and the future of the organization. For this development of OM to be effective and harmonious, it is necessary that the attention of individuals to be targeted and aligned, noticing the stimuli from the environment, and directing organizational time and cognitive effort towards the decisions to be made in the organization. In this scenario, in an attempt to improve our understanding of theoretical concepts taking into account the influence of Social Media in organizations, we raise the following question: How Social Media can be used to guide the attention of decision makers towards better creation, storage, dissemination and application of knowledge in the organization? Therefore this research is an important first step to understand the potential of Social Media in the organizational setting as a means of focusing the attention of policy makers on the development of OM. Adopting an interpretative approach to the literature review, the paper provides a discussion of 22 case studies found in the literature that were analyzed using the Attention-Based View of the Firm as a guiding lens. This analysis shows some evidence and relevant implications of the use of Social Media in the organizational context as well as a first theoretical description of how the focus of attention of decision makers influence the development of OM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Everson, M., Gundlach, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Social media and the introductory statistics course. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A69–A81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramos, I. (2011). Organizational memory : A neuroscience-based comprehensive model. In Proceedings of the 7th organization science winter conference (OSWC-XVII) on organizational memory (pp. 1–5).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnier, A. J., Sutton, J., Harris, C. B., & Wilson, R. A. (2008). A conceptual and empirical framework for the social distribution of cognition: The case of memory. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2003). Organisational memory, knowledge sharing, learning and innovation: An integrated model. Telford, Shropshire, WP006/03.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, N., Im, S., & Slater, S. F. (2013). Impact of knowledge type and strategic orientation on new product creativity and advantage in high-technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(1), 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Olivera, F. (2000). Memory systems in organizations: an empirical investigation of mechanisms for knowledge collection, storage and access. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 811–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamid, N. A. A., & Salim, J. (2010). Exploring the role of transactive memory system (TMS) for knowledge transfer processes in Malaysia E-government IT outsourcing. In International conference on information retrieval & knowledge management, CAMP2010 (pp. 303–309).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dorasamy, M., Raman, M., & Kaliannan, M. (2013). Knowledge management systems in support of disasters management : A two decade review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allahawiah, S., Al-Mobaideen, H., & Al Nawaiseh, K. (2012). The impact of information technology on knowledge management processes—An empirical study in the Arab Potash Company. International Business Review, 6(1), 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Toulabi, Z., Dehghani, M., & Al Taha, H. R. (2012). A survey of the relationship between organizational memory and organizational learning in public organizations of Kerman. International Business Review, 6(1), 90–96.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCaughey, D., & Bruning, N. S. (2010). Rationality versus reality: The challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers. Implementation Science, 5, 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stein, E. W., & Zwass, V. (1995). Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 85–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ackerman, M. S. (1994). Augmenting organizational memory: A field study of answer garden. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work, CSCW-94 (pp. 243–252).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kühn, O., & Sintek, M. (1998). Toward a technology for organizational memories. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, D. R., & Cho, H. (2008). Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61(1), 13–23.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rowlinson, M., Booth, C., Clark, P., Delahaye, A., & Procter, S. (2010). Social remembering and organizational memory. Organization Studies, 31(1), 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barros, V. F. A., & Ramos, I. (2015). Using social media as organizational memory consolidation mechanism according to attention based view theory. In Proceedings of the twenty-first Americas conference on information systems, AMCIS (pp. 1–22).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, J., Baptista, J., & Galliers, R. D. (2013). Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: The impact of social media on internal communications. Information & Management, 50(2–3), 112–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Böhringer, M., Richter, A., & Koch, M. (2009). Awareness 2.0—Ein Anwenderbeispiel von Microblogging im Unternehmen. Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 60, 275–279.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bughin, J., Byers, A. H., & Chui, M. (2011). How social technologies are extending the organization. McKinsey Quarterly, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, S., & Harwood, P. (2011). Social media and its impact on employers and trade unions.

    Google Scholar 

  24. King, K. P. (2011). Professional learning in unlikely spaces: Social media and virtual communities as professional development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 6(4), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kohler, T., Fueller, J., Matzler, K., & Stieger, D. (2011). Co-creation in virtual worlds: The design of the user experience. MIS Quarterly, 35(3), 773–788.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McAfee, A. P. (2006). Enterprise 2.0: The dawn of emergent collaboration. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(3), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duane, A., & Finnegan, P. (2003). Managing empowerment and control in an intranet environment. Information Systems Journal, 12, 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanna, R., Rohm, A., & Crittenden, V. L. (2011). We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem. Business Horizons, 54(3), 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business Horizons, 54(3), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Jackson, A., Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2007). Corporate blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. In 40th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1–10).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Davenport, T. H. (2011). Rethinking knowledge work: A strategic approach. McKinsey Quarterly, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Balayeva, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2009). Virtual office hours as cyberinfrastructure: The case study of instant messaging. Learning Inquiry, 3(3), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Berkovich, I. (2011). No we won’t! Teachers’ resistance to educational reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hatakka, M., Andersson, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Students’ use of one to one laptops: A capability approach analysis. Information Technology & People, 26(1), 94–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hargreaves, T. (2011). Pro-environmental interaction: Engaging Goffman on pro-environmental behaviour change. Working Papers, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, 1, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lantz-Andersson, A., Vigmo, S., & Bowen, R. (2013). Crossing boundaries in Facebook: Students’ framing of language learning activities as extended spaces. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3), 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. LaRue, E. M. (2012). Using Facebook as course management software: A case study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 7(1), 17–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mackness, J., Waite, M., Roberts, G., & Lovegrove, E. (2013). Learning in a small, task-oriented, connectivist MOOC: Pedagogical issues and implications for higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(4), 140–159.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Menkhoff, T., & Bengtsson, M. L. (2012). Engaging students in higher education through mobile learning: Lessons learnt in a Chinese entrepreneurship course. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(3), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nández, G., & Borrego, A. (2013). Use of social networks for academic purposes: A case study. Electron Libre, 31(6), 781–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Potter, J., & Banaji, S. (2012). Social media and self-curatorship: Reflections on identity and pedagogy through blogging on a masters module. Comunicar, 19(38), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schejter, A. M., & Tirosh, N. (2012). Social media new and old in the Al-’Arakeeb conflict: A case study. The Information Society, 28(5), 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, D., & Yue, W. T. (2013). Big data and social media use in commerce, work, and social life. Decision Support Systems, 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wikström, P., & Ellonen, H.-K. (2012). The impact of social media features on print media firms’ online business models. Journal of Media Business Studies, 9(3), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Culnan, M. J., McHugh, P. J., & Zubillaga, J. I. (2010). How large U.S. companies can use twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive, 9(4), 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Shirazi, F. (2013). Social media and the social movements in the Middle East and North Africa: A critical discourse analysis. Information Technology & People, 26(1), 28–49.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Unsworth, K., & Townes, A. (2012). Social media and E-Government: A case study assessing Twitter use in the implementation of the open government directive. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cai, K., Spangler, S., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2008). Leveraging sentiment analysis for topic detection. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chauhan, K., & Pillai, A. (2013). Role of content strategy in social media brand communities: A case of higher education institutes in India. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hopkins, J. L. (2012). Can Facebook be an effective mechanism for generating growth and value in small businesses? Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 14(2), 131–141.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. O’Shea, M., & Alonso, A. D. (2013). Fan moderation of professional sports organisations’ social media content: Strategic brilliance or pending disaster? International Journal of Web Based Communities, 9(4), 554–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. O’Shea, M., & Alonso, A. D. (2011). Opportunity or obstacle? A preliminary study of professional sport organisations in the age of social media. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 10(3–4), 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bernardo, T. M., Rajic, A., Young, I., Robiadek, K., Pham, M. T., & Funk, J. A. (2013). Scoping review on search queries and social media for disease surveillance: A chronology of innovation. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(7), e147.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vicari, S. (2013). Public reasoning around social contention: A case study of Twitter use in the Italian mobilization for global change. Current Sociology, 61(4), 474–490.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social media and the arab spring: Politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Holmberg, T. (2013). Trans-species urban politics: Stories from a beach. SP Culture, 16(1), 28–42.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. Hvass, K. A. (2013). Tourism social media and crisis communication: An erupting trend. Tourism Social Science Series, 18, 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Luoma-aho, V., Tirkkonen, P., & Vos, M. (2013). Monitoring the issue arenas of the swine-flu discussion. Journal of Communication Management, 17(3), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Martyn, H., & Gallant, L. M. (2012). Over 50 and wired: Web-based stakeholder communication. First Monday, 17(6).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Näkki, P., Bäck, A., Ropponen, T., Kronqvist, J., Hintikka, K. A., Harju, A., et al. (2011). Social media for citizen participation report on the somus project. VTT Publications, 755, 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Schwarz, A. (2012). How publics use social media to respond to blame games in crisis communication: The love parade tragedy in Duisburg 2010. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 430–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Segaard, S. B., & Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Local election blogs: Networking among the political elite. Information Polity, 18(4), 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Tufekci, Z. (2013). ‘Not this one’: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 848–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sykora, M. (2011). Web 2.0: Common uses and potential applications: An interdisciplinary study of social media with case studies of applications and some methodology improvements. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5(10), 411–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Stocker, A., & Mayer, H. (2012). Unternehmen und soziale Medien—wie passt das zusammen? [Enterprises and social media—How to get this to work?]. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 129(2), 72–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Chua, A. Y. K., & Banerjee, S. (2013). Customer knowledge management via social media: The case of Starbucks. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Bygstad, B., & Presthus, W. (2013). Social media as CRM? How two airline companies used facebook during the ‘ash crisis’ in 2010. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 25(1), 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Betton, V., & Tomlinson, V. (2013). Social media can help in recovery—But are mental health practitioners up to speed? Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 17(4), 215–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Gupta, A., Tyagi, M., & Sharma, D. (2013). Use of social media marketing in healthcare. Journal of Health Management, 15(2), 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Mitra, S., & Padman, R. (2012). Privacy and security concerns in adopting social media for personal health management: A health plan case study. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 14(4), 12–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Neiger, B. L., Thackeray, R., Burton, S. H., Giraud-Carrier, C. G., & Fagen, M. C. (2013). Evaluating social media’s capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: Use of Twitter metrics as a case study. Health Promotion Practice, 14(2), 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Lugmayr, A. (2013). Brief introduction into information systems & management research in media industries. In 2013 IEEE international conference on multimedia and expo workshops (ICMEW) (pp. 1–6).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 6–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Yates, D., Wagner, C., & Majchrzak, A. (2010). Factors affecting shapers of organizational wikis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 543–554.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Metter, E., Gyster, V., Lamson, R., & Perrin, T. (2008). Enterprise 2.0 and HR: realizing the potential. IHRIM Journal, 12(5), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Larcker, D. F., Larcker, S. M., & Tayan, B. (2012). What do corporate directors and senior managers know about social media? In The conference board. trusted insights for business worldwide (p. 15).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Scott, P. R., & Jacka, J. M. (2011). Auditing social media: A governance and risk guide. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Ala-Mutka, K. (2008). Social computing: Study on the use and impacts of collaborative content. Seville, Spain, EUR 23572 EN.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Anderson, E. (2010). Social media marketing: game theory and the emergence of collaboration. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  82. Lugmayr, A. (2013). Issues & approach in defining a european research agenda on information systems and management in creative eMedia industries. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on defining a european research agenda on information systems and management in eMedia industries, 2013, (pp. 17–25).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Meyer, M. H., & Marion, T. J. (2013). Preserving the integrity of knowledge and information in R&D. Business Horizons, 56(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Barros, V. F. A., Ramos, I., & Perez, G. (2015). Information systems and organizational memory: A literature review. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 12(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G., & Sánchez-Polo, M. T. (2011). Influence of the open-mindedness culture on organizational memory: An empirical investigation of Spanish SMEs. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Hofmann, D. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (1999). Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 286–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Assmann, J., & Czaplicka, J. (1995). Collective memory and cultural identity. New German Critique, 125–133.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Coman, A., Brown, A. D., Koppel, J., & Hirst, W. (2009). Collective memory from a psychological perspective. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 125–141.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Hirst, W., & Manier, D. (2008). Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory, 16(3), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, history, forgetting (Vol. 225). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Ackerman, M. S., & Halverson, C. (2004). Organizational memory as objects, processes, and trajectories: An examination of organizational memory in use. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13(2), 155–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lehner, F., & Maier, R. K. (2000). How can organizational memory theories contribute to organizational memory systems? Information Systems Frontiers, 2(3/4), 277–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Casey, A., & Olivera, F. (2003). Learning from the past: A review of the organizational memory literature. In The proceedings of organizational learning and knowledge, 5th international conference (pp. 1–27).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Nevo, D., Furneaux, B., & Wand, Y. (2008). Towards an evolution framework for knowledge management systems. Information Technology and Management, 9(4), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Baddeley, A. D., Eysenck, M., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Greening, D. W., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Ramos, I., & Levine, L. (2012). Organizational memory : A preliminary model based on insights from neuroscience. In Gmunden retreat on NeuroIS 2012 proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Javadi, E., Mahoney, J., & Gebauer, J. (2013). The impact of user interface design on idea integration in electronic brainstorming: An attention-based view. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Briggs, R. O. (2004). On theory-driven design of collaboration technology and process. In G.-J. de Vreede, L. A. Guerrero, & G. M. Raventós (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use (pp. 1–15). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  102. de Vreede, G.-J., & Dickson, G. W. (2000). Using GSS to design organizational processes and information systems: An action research study on collaborative business engineering. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9(2000), 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(Summer Special), 187–206.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Ekelund, L., & Räisänen, C. (2011). Re-organizing for innovation: Top management attention as a driver of strategic renewal. In International society for professional innovation management symposium, XXII ISPIM2011.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutionalized action and corporate governance: The reliance on rules of CEO succession. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 384–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. (2008). Rise and fall—or transformation? The evolution of strategic planning at the general electric company, 1940–2006. Long Range Planning, 41(3), 248–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Sullivan, B. N. (2010). Competition and beyond: problems and attention allocation in the organizational rulemaking process. Organization Science, 21(2), 432–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 170–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Kaplan, S. (2008). Cognition, capabilities, and incentives: Assessing firm response to the fiber-optic revolution. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 672–695.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Eggers, J. P., & Kaplan, S. (2009). Cognition and renewal: Comparing CEO and organizational effects on incumbent adaptation to technical change. Organization Science, 20(2), 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Barnett, M. L. (2008). An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 606–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Levy, O. (2005). The influence of top management team attention patterns on global strategic posture of firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 797–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Jacobides, M. G. (2007). The inherent limits of organizational structure and the unfulfilled role of hierarchy: Lessons from a near-war. Organization Science, 18(3), 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Marcel, J. J., Barr, P. S., & Duhaime, I. M. (2011). The influence of executive cognition on competitive dynamics. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Nigam, A., & Ocasio, W. (2010). Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21(4), 823–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Yuan, Y. C., Zhao, X., Liao, Q., & Chi, C. (2013). The use of different information and communication technologies to support knowledge sharing in organizations: From e-mail to micro-blogging. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1659–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Zorn, T. E., Grant, S., & Henderson, A. (2013). Strengthening resource mobilization chains: Developing the social media competencies of community and voluntary organizations in New Zealand. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(3), 666–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Hauptmann, S., & Steger, T. (2013). ‘A brave new (Digital) world’? Effects of in-house social media on HRM [‘A brave new (Digital) world’? Konsequenzen von in-house Social Media für das Personalmanagement]. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 27(1), 26–46.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Denskus, T., & Papan, A. S. (2013). Reflexive engagements: The international development blogging evolution and its challenges [Engagements basés sur la réflexion: L’évolution des blogs consacrés au développement international et les défis qu’elle présente]. Development in Practice, 23(4), 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Candance Deans, P. (2011). The impact of social media on C-level roles. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(4), 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Annabi, H., & McGann, S. T. (2013). Social media as the missing link: Connecting communities of practice to business strategy. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 23(1–2), 56–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Fernando, I. (2010). Community creation by means of a social media paradigm. The Learning Organization, 17(6), 500–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil and by FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology within the Project Scope UID/CEC/00319/2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor F. A. Barros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Positive Actions Applied or Expected with Implantation and Use of the Social Media in Organizations Cited in Case Studies Selected

Appendix: Positive Actions Applied or Expected with Implantation and Use of the Social Media in Organizations Cited in Case Studies Selected

COD

Positive actions analyzed—applied or expected—with implantation and use of the social media in organizations

Memory

SS

CM

CL

PL

Attention focus

T01

Provide a confidence feeling among other members of the organizations assuring a higher involvement with all members of the organizations

“[…] social media are more effective in addressing the three knowledge-sharing challenges revealed in behavioral research: (a) they help increase employees’ awareness of each other’s expertise and personal interests; (b) they can motivate contribution through frequent, timely feedback and through soliciting reciprocal exchange; and (c) they can better support the development and maintenance of social capital” [120, p. 1667]

X

   

“While access to technical support and training will assist with developing members’ skills, capabilities and confidence, a critical success factor appears to be the need for someone within Parent Support to ‘champion’ social media developments, that is, to mobilize the chain of resources. In both organizations, having someone to oversee planning and provide a sense of continuity amid frequent turnover of volunteers and staff will greatly improve the chances of achieving improved communication through social media” [121, p. 685]

T02

Change the view of each organization’s member as to share of information, influencing directly on behavior, attention and involvement of the individual in the organization

“One important reason why I am motivated to share on social media is that I could increase my visibility in the organization by interacting with others on the platform. For example, some worldwide colleagues who I don’t work with can recognize me by following my blog” [120, p. 1665]

X

   

“There are a growing number of domain experts, project managers and community leaders who have been using blogs and wikis to position themselves as an active voice in the organization, across regions and functions. As stated by one of the users (a team leader), we have ‘a very active blogosphere … some teams are spread all over the world and use wikis to work collaboratively’” [20, p. 117]

T03

Motivate and stimulate the initiative by own members in sharing information and making decisions in the organization individually/collectively

“Hence, this kind of low-level communication strengthens the aspect of sociability that is important for collaborative work such as co-creation and contributes to knowledge sharing without the need to be involved in long-lasting conversations” [122, p. 38]

X

   

“[…] a recent on-going discussion on the intranet has focused on organizational restructuring, with messages from senior management, project leaders and employees, all of whom are interested in voicing their concerns and suggestions” [20, p. 117]

“[…] more than half of internal social media users interviewed think the increased social capital associated with social media use increases their motivation for sharing expertise with one another” [120, p. 1664]

T04

Become herself/himself available and open to transmit details of the rationale process behind each decision in the organization in order to re-use that knowledge in the organization

“By examining screenshots (for anonymity they are omitted from this paper), it became evident that some of the senior managers have used their blogs to outline the rationale behind some of their decisions (for instance, to enter a new market in South America or the selection of a new venturing partner)” [20, p. 117]

X

   

“Blogs can help to focus an individual’s own thinking about his/her work, providing an additional tool for reflective practice. In addition to the individual focus, publishing this thinking on a blog makes one’s thinking easier to share and can lend itself to creating a small ‘community of practice’ if others comment on the author’s posts […]” [123, p. 458]

    

Situation of the attention

T05

Provide the share of ideas, information and experiences among the members freely and with no barriers, no great interventions, no hierarchy or sectorization, so that to generate an environment suitable for discussion of the problems and concerns in the organization, for the exchange of information in order to suggest solutions and propose innovation

“All news stories can be commented upon and rated. There’s no censoring at all. People are very happy to comment and have very candid comments, which is very good.” [20, p. 117]

X

X

  

“Encouraging open and free participation with little or no intervention has become an important governance principle; one that has been gradually established and accepted by organizational members, many of whom are actively engaged in rhetorical practices” [20, p. 117]

T06

Ensure the position of the professional as active voice in the organization, in all sectors and functions, providing higher valorization of this professional in the organization

“One important reason why I am motivated to share on social media is that I could increase my visibility in the organization by interacting with others on the platform. For example, some worldwide colleagues who I don’t work with can recognize me by following my blog” [120, p. 1665]

   

X

“Because I blog about the issues that I’m thinking about and dealing with in the course of my everyday job, I’m able to gain a wide spectrum of input and perspective on those issues, whether via comments on my posts, posts on other blogs that ‘riff’ off of mine, or—again—twitter conversations spun off of those same blog posts […]” [123, p. 458]

T07

Provide improvements in communication and share of information both in the external and the internal environment to organization, so that to provide greater information global reach and to stimulate interactivity among the organization’s individuals

“The CIO and CMO jointly are accountable for social media strategy and implementation. Performance evaluations, compensation and incentives are based on mutual performance and deliverance of shared objectives and goals. The social media goals and objectives of marketing are aligned with other organizational social media objectives through IT” [124, p. 193]

X

X

X

 

T08

Guarantee the follow up permanent of views, suggestions and comments exposed from responsible professionals in the organization

“Our findings suggest that the use of social media had become part of the social fabric of BX. Blogs, wikis and commenting were no longer a novelty and are accepted as a normal feature of the intranet by employees. Open and participative communication is the default mode of BX’s communication culture, and is representative of a shift in the role of employees from ‘audience’ to active ‘rhetors’ in the organization’s on-line environment. Monitoring feedback and engaging in discussions regarding certain strategies and decisions is now a feature of the day-to-day life of senior management” [20, p. 119]

 

X

  

Structured distribution of the attention

T09

Disseminate the organization’s values simply and integrate such values to actions and decisions in the organization

“In this context, DX’s intranet is perceived as the most important medium for internal communication, not just because of its wide reach globally, but also because of its capacity to broadcast a unified voice to communicate and reinforce corporate values and strategy” [20, p. 118]

  

X

 

T10

Facilitate better adaptation, whether by training, handbooks and guidelines, in effective use of the technologies adopted by part of the organization in order to make easy the organization’s internal and external communication

“Organizations must provide training and role definition that maintains a balance between autonomy, flexibility, and the identified responsibilities and expectations” [125, p. 78]

X

X

X?

 

T11

Produce new organizational structures and models considered useful for the making-decision from the permanent follow-up of the views, suggestions, problems and comments exposed by the organization

“From looking at maps that others had generated from Google Maps and posted online the author created a method for displaying the information geographically instead of in a table” [74, p. 10]

  

X

X

“With wikis in place, CoP leadership will have access to training materials, organizational CoP standards, templates, and best practices in order to be truly prepared and empowered by the organization to lead his or her CoP. Providing this space for CoP leaders to post information on salient issues and building on each other’s experiences and knowledge, is an important step in the continuity of training and role definition for future leaders and members of CoP” [125, p. 78]

T12

Generate changes in the processes, strategies, routines and culture of the organization so that such changes can lead in effective restructuring, alignment and adequacy of the communication and share of information in the organization

“Specifically, we see a highly vibrant landscape where social media has been incorporated extensively into NX’s organizational communication, and embedded in its day-to-day functioning.” [20, p. 118]

  

X

X

“Social media adoption is less about the tools but rather the strategies and the attitudes of the people and the community driving it. Part of the objective of the BlueBI Campaign is to develop a coherent platform which can be used to nurture a community” [126, p. 508]

“Implementing the guidelines using SM has implications for resource allocation and change in organizational culture. Organizations must allocate the appropriate resources for training and support of these communities. Perhaps most noteworthy is the change in culture required at all levels of the organization. Upper management and its employees must change perceptions of the role of the CoP and their importance to the organization. Striking a balance between alignment with organization structure and strategy as well as the emergent and informal nature of the CoP is also essential” [125, p. 79]

T13

Strengthening of organizational standards in order to allow an open, bidirectional and interactive communication

“Clear guidelines should be provided to help employees handle the “sticky” aspects of earlier tools. In the absence of such guidelines, employees may go in different directions, which may create more difficulties for knowledge sharing” [120, p. 1667]

   

X

“Creating and maintaining norms that promoted engagement seems to have played a significant role in encouraging employees to establish two-way communication in this organization. Interactivity is enabled by a sense of openness of communication that is unconstrained by hierarchy […]” [20, p. 117]

T14

Ensure a positive and functional corporative image, increasing the reputation not only of the organization, but also their employees

“[…] the internal social media platform makes it so easy to share” [120, p. 1665]

   

X

“Some of these blogs have received extensive comment from employees, ranging from the positive to the extremely negative. Some request clarification regarding, or even questioning, NX’s strategy moving forward. What is insightful is the amount of effort that the various bloggers spend in responding to comments and concerns” [20, p. 117]

  1. Legend
  2. SS Sensorial memory
  3. CM Communicative memory
  4. CL Cultural memory
  5. PL Political memory

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barros, V.F.A., Ramos, I. (2016). Using Social Media as a Mechanism to Consolidate the Organizational Memory—Insights from the Attention Based View of the Firm Theory. In: Lugmayr, A., Stojmenova, E., Stanoevska, K., Wellington, R. (eds) Information Systems and Management in Media and Entertainment Industries. International Series on Computer Entertainment and Media Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49407-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49407-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49405-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49407-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics