Abstract
The surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women has evolved over the last several decades, with bladder neck suspension procedures representing the oldest approach. The Burch colposuspension in particular was originally introduced in 1961 and has since undergone modification in technique, most recently with the introduction of robotic approaches. With the recent rise in litigation and concerns over vaginal mesh, there has been renewed interest in bladder suspension procedures. Outcomes remain promising for this technique, based on its long-term efficacy and durability. In this chapter, we present an index patient with SUI who experienced favorable outcomes following Burch colposuspension. We discuss surgical indications, patient counseling, intraoperative techniques, post-operative considerations, and contemporary outcomes using this approach. In the accompanying video supplements, we provide an open Burch colposuspension as well as an illustrative example demonstrating a robotic Burch colposuspension.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, Newton K. Urinary incontinence in US women: a population based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:537–42.
Hampel C, Weinhold D, Benken N, Eggersmann C, Thuroff JW. Definition of overactive bladder and epidemiology of urinary incontinence. Urology. 1997;50(suppl 6A):4–14.
Burch JC. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;81:281–90.
Tanagho EA. Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol. 1978;116:751–3.
Lapitan MC, Cody DJ. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6, CD002912.
Hong JH, Choo MS, Lee KS. Long term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24(6):1182–6.
Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson D. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a systematic review. BJOG. 2003;23(3):277–83.
Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2143–55.
Kraus SR, Lemack GE, Richter HE, et al. Changes in urodynamic measures Two years after Burch colposuspension or autologous sling surgery. Urology. 2011;78(6):1263–8.
Tennstedt SL, Litman HJ, Zimmern P, et al. Quality of life after surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1631–8.
Brubaker L, Richter H, Norten P, Albo ME, et al. 5-year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of Burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012;187:1324–30.
Asicioglu O, Gungorduk K, Besimoglu B, Ertas IE, Yildirim G, Celebi I, et al. A 5-year follow-up study comparing Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):73–7.
Ward KL, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow-up. BJOG. 2008;115:226.
Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Karram MM, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long term follow-up. BJOG. 2008;115:219.
Patel PR, Borahay MA, Puentes AR, et al. Initial experience with robotic retropubic urethropexy compared to open retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;315680:1–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
(MP4 18110 kb)
(MP4 108000 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singla, A.K., Singla, N. (2017). Burch Colposuspension. In: Zimmern, P., De, E. (eds) Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45266-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45268-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)