Skip to main content

Burch Colposuspension

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse

Abstract

The surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women has evolved over the last several decades, with bladder neck suspension procedures representing the oldest approach. The Burch colposuspension in particular was originally introduced in 1961 and has since undergone modification in technique, most recently with the introduction of robotic approaches. With the recent rise in litigation and concerns over vaginal mesh, there has been renewed interest in bladder suspension procedures. Outcomes remain promising for this technique, based on its long-term efficacy and durability. In this chapter, we present an index patient with SUI who experienced favorable outcomes following Burch colposuspension. We discuss surgical indications, patient counseling, intraoperative techniques, post-operative considerations, and contemporary outcomes using this approach. In the accompanying video supplements, we provide an open Burch colposuspension as well as an illustrative example demonstrating a robotic Burch colposuspension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Melville JL, Katon W, Delaney K, Newton K. Urinary incontinence in US women: a population based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:537–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hampel C, Weinhold D, Benken N, Eggersmann C, Thuroff JW. Definition of overactive bladder and epidemiology of urinary incontinence. Urology. 1997;50(suppl 6A):4–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burch JC. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper’s ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;81:281–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanagho EA. Colpocystourethropexy: the way we do it. J Urol. 1978;116:751–3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lapitan MC, Cody DJ. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6, CD002912.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hong JH, Choo MS, Lee KS. Long term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women. J Korean Med Sci. 2009;24(6):1182–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson D. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a systematic review. BJOG. 2003;23(3):277–83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(21):2143–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kraus SR, Lemack GE, Richter HE, et al. Changes in urodynamic measures Two years after Burch colposuspension or autologous sling surgery. Urology. 2011;78(6):1263–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tennstedt SL, Litman HJ, Zimmern P, et al. Quality of life after surgery for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(12):1631–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brubaker L, Richter H, Norten P, Albo ME, et al. 5-year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of Burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2012;187:1324–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Asicioglu O, Gungorduk K, Besimoglu B, Ertas IE, Yildirim G, Celebi I, et al. A 5-year follow-up study comparing Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):73–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ward KL, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow-up. BJOG. 2008;115:226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Karram MM, et al. Randomized trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long term follow-up. BJOG. 2008;115:219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel PR, Borahay MA, Puentes AR, et al. Initial experience with robotic retropubic urethropexy compared to open retropubic urethropexy. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013;315680:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay K. Singla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(MP4 18110 kb)

(MP4 108000 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singla, A.K., Singla, N. (2017). Burch Colposuspension. In: Zimmern, P., De, E. (eds) Native Tissue Repair for Incontinence and Prolapse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45268-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-45266-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-45268-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics