Skip to main content

Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Consent in Pediatric Urology
  • 606 Accesses

Abstract

Name of Procedure: Pyeloplasty

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YFH. Chapter 133: surgery of the ureter in children. Wein Et al. Campbell-Walsh Urology. vol. 4, 11th ed. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Varda BK, Johnson EK, et al. National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2013;191:1090–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Mei H, Pu J, Yang C, et al. Laparoscopic vs open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2011;25(5):727–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Riachy E, Cost NG, Defoor WR, et al. Pediatric standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparative single institution study. J Urol. 2013;189(1):283–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Farhat WA, et al. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. J Urol. 2008;180:1693.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee LC, Kanaroglou N, Gleason JM, et al. Impact of drainage technique on pediatric pyeloplasty: comparative analysis of externalized uretero-pyelostomy vs double-J internal stents. CAUJ. 2015;9(7–8):e453–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ben-Meir D, Golan S, Ehrlich Y, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of bacterial colonization of ureteral double-J stents in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5:355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas JC, DeMarco RT, Donohoe JM, et al. Management of the failed pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2005;174:2363–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salem YH, Majd M, Rushton HG, Belman AB. Outcome analysis of pediatric pyeloplasty as a function of patient age, presentation, and differential renal function. J Urol. 1995;154:1889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Psooy K, Pike JG, Leonard MP. Long-term follow-up of pediatric dismembered pyeloplasty – how long is enough? J Urol. 2003;169(5):1809–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Bagli DJ, et al. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort. J Urol. 2008;18(4):1684–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee HE, Park KJ, Choi H. An analysis of long-term occurrence of renal complications following pediatric pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:1083; epub.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Doraiswamy NV. Retrograde ureteroplasty using balloon dilatation in children with pelviureteric obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faerber GJ, Ritchey ML, Bloom DA. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in infants and young children after failed pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;154:1495–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Braga LHP, Lorenzo AJ, Skeldon S, et al. Failed pyeloplasty in children: comparative analysis of retrograde endopyelotomy vs redo pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007;178:2571–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Veenboer PW, Chrzan R, Dik P, et al. Secondary endoscopic pyelotomy in children with failed pyeloplasty. Urology. 2011;77:1450–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Romao RLP, Koyle MA, Pippi Salle JL, et al. Failed pyeloplasty in children: revisiting the unknown. Urology. 2013;82(5):1145–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Piaggio LA, Noh PH, Gonzalez R. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty I children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol. 2007;177:1878–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leung L, Chen IHY, Chung PHY, et al. Outcomes of re-intervention for laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol. 2016;26(4):318–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Hou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hou, A. (2016). Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. In: Godbole, P., Wilcox, D., Koyle, M. (eds) Consent in Pediatric Urology . Handbook Series of Consent in Pediatric Surgical Subspecialities . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43527-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43527-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43526-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43527-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics