Skip to main content

Hydrocele and Hernia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Consent in Pediatric Urology

Abstract

Name of Procedure: Hydrocelectomy or herniorrhaphy

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hall N, Ron O, Eaton S, Pierro A. Surgery for hydrocele in children – an avoidable excess? J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(12):2401–24054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen LE, Zamakhshary M, Foglia RP, et al. Impact of wait time on outcome for inguinal hernia repair in infants. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:223–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fasching G, Hollwarth ME. Risk of testicular lesions following incarcerated inguinal hernia in infants. Pediatr Surg Int. 1989;4(4):265–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gahukamble DB, Khamage AS. Prospective randomized controlled study of excision versus distal splitting of hernial sac and processus vaginalis in the repair of inguinal hernias and communicating hydroceles. J Pediatr Surg. 1995;130(4):624–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson JM, Aaronson DS, Schrader R, et al. Hydrocele in the pediatric patient: inguinal or scrotal approach? J Urol. 2008;180:1724–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiddoo DA, Wollin TA, Mador DR. A population based assessment of complications following outpatient hydrocelectomy and spermatocelectomy. J Urol. 2004;171(2 pt 1):746–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murat I, Constant I, Maud’huy H. Perioperative anaesthetic morbidity in children: a database of 24 165 anaesthetics over a 30-month period. Pediatr Anesth. 2004;14(2):158–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cruse PJ, Foord R. The epidemiology of wound infection. A 10-year prospective study of 62,939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am. 1980;60:27–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Esposito C, St. Peter SD, Escolino M, Juang D, Settimi A, Holcomb G. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in pediatric patients: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2014;24(11):811–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bharathi R, Arora M, Baskaran V. Minimal access surgery of pediatric inguinal hernias: a review. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1751–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J, et al. Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:1824–183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Lange DH, Kreeft M, Van Ramshorst GH, Aufenacker TJ, Rauwerda JA, Simons MP. Inguinal hernia surgery in the Netherlands: are patients treated according to the guidelines? Hernia. 2010;14:143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alp B, Irkilata H, Kibar Y, Zorba U. Comparison of the inguinal and scrotal approaches for the treatment of communicating hydrocele in children. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Redman J, Jacks D, O’Donnell P. Cystectomy: a catastrophic complication of herniorrhaphy. J Urol. 1985;133:97–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zahalsky MP, Berman AJ, Nagler HM. Evaluating the risk of epididymal injury during hydrocelectomy and spermatocelectomy. J Urol. 2004;171(6 Pt 1):2291–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Popek EJ. Embryonal remnants in inguinal hernia sacs. Hum Pathol. 1990;21(3):339–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steigman CK, Sotelo-Avila C, Weber TR. The incidence of spermatic cord structures in inguinal hernia sacs from male children. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:880–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friberg J, Fritjofsson A. Inguinal herniorrhaphy and sperm-agglutinating antibodies in infertile men. Arch Androl. 1979;2(4):317–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chrouser K, Vandersteen D, Crocker J, Reinberg Y. Nerve injury after laparoscopic varicolectomy. J Urol. 2004;172:691–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zendejas B, Zarroug A, Erben Y, Holley C, Farley D. Impact of childhood inguinal hernia repair in adulthood: 50 years of follow-up. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(6):762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ein SH, Njere I, Ein A. Six thousand three hundred sixty-one pediatric inguinal hernias: a 35-year review. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:980–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davies B, Fraser N, Najmaldin A, Squire B, Crabbe D, Stringer M. Prospective study of neonatal inguinal herniotomy: the problem of the postoperative hydrocele. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003;19:68–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parelkar SV, Oak S, Gupta R, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the pediatric age group–experience with 437 children. Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:789–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Palmer L, Palmer J. Management of abnormalities of the external genitalia in boys. In: Wein A, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. Elsevier Health Sciences, Cambridge, MA, 9th ed. 2011;146: 3368–98.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Orth RC, Towbin AJ. Acute testicular ischemia caused by incarcerated inguinal hernia. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42(2):196–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Endo M, Watanabe T, Nakano M, et al. Laparoscopic completely extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia in children: a single-institute experience with 1,257 repairs compared with cut-down herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1706–1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nah SA, Giacomello L, Eaton S, de Coppi P, Curry JI, Drake DP, Kiely EM, Pierro A. Surgical repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia in children: laparoscopic or open? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2011;21(1):8–11. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1262793. Epub 2010 Oct 11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang JZ, Li XZ. Inguinal hernia in infants and children in China. Pediatr Surg Int. 1993;8:458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Esposito C, Turial S, Escolino M, Giurin I, Alicchio F, Enders J, Krause K, Settimi A, Schier F. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in premature babies weighing 3 kg or less. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28:989–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaplan GW. Iatrogenic cryptorchidism resulting from hernia repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;142:671.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grosfeld J, Minnick K, Shedd F, West K, Rescorla F, Vane D. Inguinal hernia in children: factors affecting recurrence in 62 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26(3):283–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gokcora I, Yagmurlu A. A longitudinal follow-up using the high trans-scrotal approach for inguinal and scrotal abnormalities in boys. Hernia. 2003;7(4):181–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Alzahem A. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniotomy in infants and children: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2011;27(6):605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Steinau G, Treutner KH, Feeken G, Schumpelick V. Recurrent inguinal hernias in infants and children. World J Surg. 1995;19(2):303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vogels HDE, Bruijnen CJP, Beasley SW. Predictors of recurrence after inguinal herniotomy in boys. Pediatr Surg Int. 2009;25:235–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Iyer K, Kumar V, Huddart S, Bianchi A. The scrotal approach. Pediatr Surg Int. 1995;10:58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lais A, Ferro F. Trans-scrotal approach for surgical correction of cryptorchidism and congenital anomalies of the processus vaginalis. Eur Urol. 1996;29:235.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Calkins CM, St. Peter SD, Balcom A, Murphy PJ. Late abscess formation following indirect hernia repair utilizing silk suture. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23(4):349–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Miltenburg DM, Nuchtern JG, Jaksic T, et al. Meta-analysis of the risk of metachronous hernia in infants and children. Am J Surg. 1997;174:741–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hoshino M, Sugito K, Kawashima H, Goto S, Furuya K. Prediction of contralateral inguinal hernias in children: a prospective study of 357 unilateral inguinal hernias. Hernia. 2014;18(3):333–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhong H, Wang F. Contralateral metachronous hernia following negative laparoscopic evaluation for contralateral patent processus vaginalis: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2014;24(2):111–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Chalmers MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chalmers, D., Serrell, E. (2016). Hydrocele and Hernia. In: Godbole, P., Wilcox, D., Koyle, M. (eds) Consent in Pediatric Urology . Handbook Series of Consent in Pediatric Surgical Subspecialities . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43527-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43527-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43526-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43527-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics