Abstract
The main aim of the presented empirical study is verification that leadership styles are not homogenous. Using hierarchical cluster analysis (n = 477), we demonstrated heterogeneity of leadership styles expressed in behavioral configuration of leadership profiles. Individual differences in leadership profiles reflect authentic managerial leading styles, which managers deploy in real organizational circumstances. Presented findings yielded that configurations of leadership styles, i.e. leadership profiles, go beyond a two-dimensional pattern of task- and follower-orientation. This study also determined that there are differences in the personality configuration between leadership profiles (n = 333). By verifying differences in personality traits in each of the leadership profiles, we have also proven that they are psychologically consistent. Results deliver a distinction among leaders who are active, task-oriented, sociable and conscientious labeled Natural leaders; inactive but open to experience, agreeable and rewarding named Pseudo-democrats; active, oriented towards personal achievement, risk oriented and high on neuroticism labeled Machiavellians; and inactive, dysfunctional, absent, low on extraversion and conscientiousness named Pseudo-supervisors. This study shows that authentic managerial leading styles extend beyond “pure” task- or follower-orientation; rather they require abilities to utilize various kinds of behavioral styles in a given situation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fiedler, F.E.: Personality, motivational systems and the behavior of high and low LPC persons. Hum. Relat. 25, 391–412 (1971)
Ross, L., Nisbett, R.E.: The Person and the Situation: Perspectives of Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)
Einarsen, S., Aasland, M.S., Skogstad, A.: Destructive leadership behavior: A definition and conceptual model. Leadership Quart. 18, 207–216 (2007)
Shaw, J.B., Erickson, A., Harvey, M.: A method for measuring destructive leadership and identifying types of destructive leaders in organizations. Leadership Quart. 22, 575–590 (2011)
Epstein, S.: Explorations in personality today and tomorrow: a tribute to Henry A. Murray Am. Psychol. 34, 649–653 (1979)
Babiak, J.: Polish Managers’ Leadership Styles: Developing and Validating the Managerial Styles of Leading Questionnaire. Pol. J. Appl. Psychol. 12, 41–64 (2014)
Bass, B.M.: Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership. Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. The Free Press, New York (1990)
Bass, B.M., Bass, R.: The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (2008)
Bono, J.E., Shen, W., Yoon, D.J.: Personality and leadership: looking back, looking ahead. In: Day, D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations, pp. 199–218. Oxford University Press, New York (2014)
Bajcar, B., Babiak, J., Nosal, C.S.: When leaders become strategists: a new look at the determinants of leadership styles through their relationship with strategic thinking. Proc. Manuf. 3, 3669–3676 (2015)
Stogdill, R.M.: Handbook of Leadership. A Survey of Theory and Research. The Free Press, New York (1974)
Yukl, G.: Leadership in Organizations. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River (2006)
Tannenbaum, A.S., Schmitt, W.H.: How to choose a leadership pattern. Harv. Bus. Rev. 36, 95–101 (1958)
Fleishman, E.A.: The measurement of leadership attitudes in industry. J. Appl. Psychol. 37, 153–158 (1953)
Misumi, J., Peterson, M.F.: The performance maintenance theory of leadership: review of a Japanese research program. Admin. Sci. Quart. 30, 198–223 (1985)
House, R.: A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. 16, 321–338 (1971)
Hogan, R., Hogan, J.: Assessing leadership: a view from the dark side. Int. J. Sel. Assessment 9, 40–51 (2001)
Costa Jr., P.T., McCrae, R.R.: Domains and facet: hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. J. Pers. Assess. 64, 21–50 (1995)
Bono, J.E., Judge, T.A.: Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 89, 901–910 (2004)
Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E.: Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 751–765 (2000)
Ployhart, R.E., Lim, B.C., Chan, K.Y.: Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five factor model of personality. Pers. Psychol. 54, 809–843 (2001)
Bass, B.M., Riggio, R.E.: Transformational Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)
Kaiser, R.B., Hogan, J.: Personality, leader behavior, and overdoing it. Consult. Psychol. J. 63, 219–242 (2011)
DeRue, D.S., Nahrgang, J.D., Wellman, N., Humphrey, S.E.: Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Pers. Psychol. 64, 7–52 (2011)
Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., Judge, T.A.: Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: what do we know and where do we next? Int. J. Sel. Assess 9, 9–30 (2001)
Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P., Śliwińska, M.: Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy & McCrae. Adaptacja Polska. Podręcznik. [NEO-FFI Inventory of Costa and McCrae. Polish adaptation. Manual]. Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP, Warszawa (1998)
McCrae, R.R., Costa Jr., P.T., Hrebickova, M., Urbanek, T., Martin, T., Oryol, V.E., Senin, I.G.: Age differences in personality traits across cultures: self-report and observer perspectives. Eur. J. Pers. 18, 143–157 (2004)
Aldenderfer, M.S., Blashfield, R.K.: Cluster Analysis. Sage Press, Beverly Hills, CA (1984)
Magidson, J., Vermunt, J.K.: Latent class models for clustering: a comparison with K-means. Can. J. Market. Res. 20, 37–44 (2002)
Tepper, B.J.: Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad. Manag. J. 43, 178–190 (2000)
Keelan, E.: Bully for you. Accountancy 125, 56 (2000)
Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z.: How leadership characteristics affect organizational decline and downsizing. J. Bus. Ethics 86, 363–378 (2009)
Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R., Gerhardt, M.W.: Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 765–780 (2002)
Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56, 81–105 (1959)
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88, 879–903 (2003)
Conway, J.M.: Method variance and method bias in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Rogelberg, S.G. (ed.) Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 344–365. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford (2004)
Lindell, M.K., Whitney, D.J.: Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional designs. J. Appl. Psychol. 86, 114–121 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Babiak, J., Bajcar, B., Nosal, C.S. (2017). Heterogeneity of Leadership Styles as Behavioral Units: The Role of Personality in Searching for Leadership Profiles. In: Kantola, J., Barath, T., Nazir, S., Andre, T. (eds) Advances in Human Factors, Business Management, Training and Education. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 498. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42070-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42070-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-42069-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-42070-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)