Abstract
Dynamic tensile testing using Kolsky Bar methods are used to assess crashworthiness of new structural materials needed for lightweight automotive design. High speed Digital Image Correlation (DIC) measurements routinely show that the strain experienced by dynamic tensile specimens deviates markedly from what is expected from the original strain wave analysis techniques used in tensile Kolsky bar metrology. Deviations can be manifest either by different average strain values over the gage section, or by departures from strain uniformity, or both. The former can be attributed to plastic yielding in the specimen outside the gauge section, while the latter concerns specimen geometry and material hardening effects. These issues are sometimes difficult to eliminate through simple modifications of the sample or the test design. Finally, it is of interest to make use of the data beyond necking, where the strain state departs significantly from ideal conditions. These metrology issues lend themselves to solution by inverse methods, where full field strain measurements and global load measurement data are available. In this paper we describe typical measurement data and explore methods to identify the constitutive response from dynamic tensile tests.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bao, Y., Wierzbicki, T.: On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 46, 81–98 (2004)
Gilat, A., Schmidt, T., Walker, A.: Full field strain measurement in compression and tensile split Hopkinson bar experiments. Exp. Mech. 49, 291–302 (2009)
Mates, S., Abu-Farha, F. Dynamic tensile behavior of a quenched and partitioned high strength steel using a Kolsky Bar. In: Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics 2015 Annual Meeting. Society for Experimental Mechanics, Costa Mesa (2015)
Bridgman, P.: Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture. McGraw-Hill, New York (1952)
Avril, S., et al.: Overview of identification methods of mechanical parameters based on full-field measurements. Exp. Mech. 48, 381–402 (2008)
Pierron, F., Grédiac, M.: The Virtual Fields Method. Springer, New York (2012)
Pierron, F., Zhu, H., Siviour, C.: Beyond Hopkinson’s bar. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 372(2023), 24 (2014)
Chen, W., Song, B.: Split Hopkinson (Kolsky) Bar. Springer, New York (2010)
Acknowledgments/Disclaimer
This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy under Cooperative Agreement Number DE-EE0005976, with United States Automotive Materials Partnership LLC (USAMP). This support is greatly appreciated. Official contribution of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; not subject to copyright in the United States. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mates, S., Abu-Farha, F. (2017). Opportunities for Inverse Analysis in Dynamic Tensile Testing. In: Yoshida, S., Lamberti, L., Sciammarella, C. (eds) Advancement of Optical Methods in Experimental Mechanics, Volume 3. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41600-7_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-41599-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-41600-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)